By undertaking this experiment with the use of another song tests the concept of different auditory stimuli positively affecting memory recall. Thus it will be plausible to determine whether or not there are benefits to listening to music whilst studying. This experiment’s aim is to investigate the effects of the presence of easy listening background music on memory recall of students from a Queensland Academy.
Method
An independent measures design was used whereby different participants were used in both conditions. This design was employed as effects such as fatigue, boredom and previous exposure to the material provided are unlikely to factor into the results. By using this method, demand characteristics are less of a problem as the participants are kept naive to the stimulus material until during the experiment. The manipulated independent variable of this experiment was the presence of easy listening background music when viewing and recalling words. Easy listening background music is defined as having a ‘melodic melody line over non dissonant chordal structures and is nonpercussive in beat.’ (Davidson & Powell, 1986) The dependent or measured variable of this experiment is the number of correctly recalled words remembered by the participants. The words provided were chosen all in varying length with differing syllables generated from an online site. The participants were divided into two groups, one of which as the control with no music; and the other with music being played at both recall and memorization. Factors such as the time they were shown the word lists and the amount of time to write things down were controlled in order to make results more accurate. Their results were then kept anonymous in order to maintain confidentiality.
Participants
A total of 20 students from a selective Queensland Academy, who were not studying psychology as a subject participated in this experiment. Participants ranged from 14 to 18 years old, consisting of 8 male participants and 12 female. The participants were divided randomly by picking a group from a hat, with each group containing a total of 10 participants. Participants gave informed consent to the experiment, and consent was also obtained from their parents. The participants were from various nationalities and backgrounds. A random sample would have been more reliable and allow for the results to be more generalised however opportunity sampling method was used due to availability.
Materials
In order to conduct this experiment it was necessary to use a stopwatch, a data projector, an easy listening song (“Come Home” by One Republic), a laptop with the word list, scripted standardized instructions for the experiment (Appendix I) and writing material. The data projector would display the word list created on the laptop to the participants. The words chosen were simple words that were believed to be non schema related or too distinctive in order to minimize the chance of biased results. A copy of the word list can be located in the appendix. (Appendix II)
Procedure
At the beginning of the experiment, participants were made to pick from a hat a slip of paper containing what condition they would be in, both conditions were then read out a set of standardised instructions (Appendix I). They were then sat at evenly spaced desks in order to prevent cheating, and provided with paper and pens. They were then shown the words via the projector for 1 minute, which was timed using the stop watch. After one minute had elapsed the projector was then switched off. Once the words were removed from view the participants were given two minutes to write down all the words they could recall. Once finished their results were collected for processing and they were read out the debriefing statement (Appendix I). The experiment was repeated with group two, however the song ‘Come Home’ was played through the speakers during memorization and recall.
Results
The memory recall scores for both groups were analysed using Microsoft Excel. Raw data can be located in the Appendix. (Appendix IV)
Graph 1: A column graph depicting the average number of words recalled in both experimental conditions
The number of words recalled for the control group was an average of 8.2, in comparison to the 11.5 words recalled by the music group. This shows that on average students were able to recall more words when exposed to the easy listening background music. The standard deviation in total for the control group was 1.4 for the control and 1.96 for the music condition. This shows that there was a greater deviation of results in the experimental condition, resulting in the data being considered less reliable, however as it is still a low standard deviation meaning that it is unlikely for this to have impacted the conclusion drawn from the data.
Discussion
The results show that the number of words recalled by participants with music was greater than the control, with no musical stimuli. The number of words recalled for the music group was 11.5 in comparison to 8.2 by the control group. Participants from the music group recalled 3.3 out of the 15 words provided more than the control group. This experiment supports St Clair’s theory as the results showed that the presence of background music had a positive effect on recall as well as Thompson & Tulving’s encoding specificity principle of memory. The auditory stimulus of the song was present at both memorization and recall. It was found that the number of words recalled when the sensory information present was greater than when absent.
Although this experiment served to support the predicted outcome there were still several limitations presented by the experimental methodology. Although the song fit the genre of easy listening background music, it was different to the song used in St Clair’s experiment. The song also differs to the one used in other experiments which shows that music has a negative effect on recall. In order to determine whether or not other styles of music produce the same effect, it is necessary to repeat the experiment with other genres of music. This modification would allow for more generalised assumptions in regards to effect of all kinds of music on memory.
In addition to this, the use of convenient sampling introduces potentially confounding variables which may have had an effect on the results. As convenience sampling was used ecological validity may have been compromised. A random sample of students would be more representative. Participants may have been influenced by other factors, for example their own background and their interests. Students may have been able to cheat by reading the words recalled from other participants sitting nearby, thus affecting the results and explaining the low standard deviation. It would be more accurate to test the participants individually however that would have been more time consuming. Another limitation is that the experiment is also not very ecologically valid being that it is a lab experiment and that students would not usually be exposed to background music in both memorization and recall for exams.
In conclusion this experiment shows that the presence of background music has a slight increase on the recall of words by participants. This supports the theory proposed by Thompson and Tulving as well as that proposed by St. Clair. The results of this experiment suggest that students should be able to listen to music during their time of study as it may improve their memory recall in exams, however only when they have access to the same auditory stimuli present in exam conditions as when studying this it may not prove as helpful in real life situation.
References
Clair, A. M. (2000). The Effects of Music During Apprehension on Memory Performance. National Undergraduate Research Clearinghouse, 3. Available online at http://www.webclearinghouse.net/volume/. Retrieved May 29, 2011.
Haralambos M., Rice, D., Foreman, N., Jones, S., Stenner, P., Brown, S., Sharp, K. (2002). Psychology in Focus.
Thomspon, D.M., & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86,255-262
Appendix
Appendix i: Specific opening instructions and closing statement
Opening instructions:
Good morning/afternoon, you are about to participate in an experiment which investigates the effects of the presence of background music on students’ abilities to remember words off a list. The experiment will go for approximately 10 minutes, and there will be two parts to the experiment. In the first part, a list of 15 words will be displayed on the projector. You will be given one minute to memorize these words in silence. After this minute is up, in the second part of the experiment you will be required to write down as many words as you can remember on the piece of paper in front of you. You will be told when it is time to move onto this part of the experiment. Please refrain from looking at each other’s papers, as this could compromise the results of the experiment. Please also remain silent so that other students can concentrate while they are memorizing and recalling words. Please try and focus on remembering as many of the words on the list as possible, and once the two minutes you are given to recall the words is up we will notify you. Remember that at any time you can withdraw from the experiment and your answers will not count towards the final results.
Does anyone have any questions? Is everybody ready to begin?
Debriefing:
Thank you for taking part in our experiment. If you could leave your papers on the desk along with any pens you borrowed we would appreciate it. Once we compile our findings we will come and show you them. Please remember that your name will not be tied with your answers and that you have a right to withdraw your answers at any point in time up until the production of the report. Also, the results do not represent intelligence or any factors of comparison in any way.
Are there any more questions before you leave? Thank you, you may now leave.
Appendix ii: Word List
Salt Soldier
Spirit False
Hobby Father
Aspirin Snore
Hour Injury
Gondola Stadium
Ransom Plastic
Ski Roses
Idiot Tennis
Insult Motor
Appendix iii: Participants Informed Consent
Information for the Participant
The Effect of Background Music on Memory Recall
Kayla and Jaydon
Thank you for taking the time to participate in this study. The following details are provided to inform you about the project. Please read this statement carefully and feel free to ask any questions that you have at any time.
-
Reason for the study: being conducted in order to investigate how music affects memory.
-
How long the study will take: around 15 minutes for each different group.
-
Description of your involvement: during this study, you will be asked to observe a list of words and then be asked to remember and record which words you can recall.
-
Possible risks you will be exposed to: Minor mental strain, possible risk of embarrassment and possible discomfort.
-
Benefits from your participation in the study: Learning the effect of background music of memory recall. Knowing whether or not listening to music is beneficial for studying.
-
How will the information you provide stay confidential? All results will be kept anonymous on password-protected computers.
-
How will your privacy be protected? Own results will be kept anonymous and stored in a locked locker as well as in digital format on password-protected computers.
-
How will all the information be kept secure? Own results will be kept anonymous and stored in a locked locker as well as in digital format on password-protected computers.
-
How to access emergency medical treatment should an injury occur: First aid care will be provided by the school office if required.
-
Statement that the subject’s participation is voluntary and that they may withdraw at anytime without prejudice: Subjects’ participation is voluntary and that they may withdraw at anytime if they so wish without prejudiced.
-
Statement that advises what would happen to data already collected should they withdraw after commencing the project: Results from withdrawn participants will be destroyed and all evidence of their withdrawal shall also be destroyed.
-
Contact details for further questions about participation in the project: If you wish to ask further questions as to your participation in the experiment please contact Kayla or Jaydon.
-
How you will be given feed back after the project is completed: Participants are able to email the experimenters if they wish to view the results from the entire experiment.
This study has been approved by Queensland Academy for Health Sciences and adheres to the Academy’s Guidelines of the ethical conduct of experiments using human participants. You are free to discuss your participation in this study with the student’s supervisor, Ms Hammerton .
Appendix iv: Raw data