• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate the experiment as a research methodology.

Extracts from this document...


Describe and evaluate the experiment as a research methodology. The experimental method is one of the most common psychological enquiries used by psychologists. In the experiment a theory generates different hypothesis, or predictions, that are tested by collecting data. It is the only method that investigated the concept of 'cause and effect' by manipulating the independent variable (IV) which affects the dependant variable (DV). However, to enable the experiment to work, all other variables have to be controlled; otherwise confounding variables may occur. A controlled experiment can be replicated, which is a great advantage in psychology, to test previous results. Some disadvantages are the ethics concerned, which can make it difficult to perform the experiment properly. To analyze this method properly we have to look at other methods such as natural experiments, naturalistic observation or correlational studies. The experimental method depends on the manipulation of the independent variable while all others are kept constant, to investigate a causal relationship. The hypothesis predicts this, and data is collected to see if the independent variable (the cause) affected the dependant variable (the effect). ...read more.


However, it is hard to accurately achieve this, since the experiment has to be controlled and confounding variables avoided. For example, in the subway investigation by Piliavin et al, the cause was the appearance of the 'victim' collapsing and the effect was the participant's reaction towards helping the victim. The drunk victim received far less help than the cane victim and demonstrates a causal effect of the appearance towards the behavior Another strength of this method is the ability to replicate a previous experiment. In theory, if the experiment was controlled and had no confounding variables you would be able to repeat it and find the same results. Even though this is extremely hard to do, it is easiest with the experimental. It is much harder to replicate a quasi-experiment for example because the "manipulation of the independent variable is often not in the control of the experimenter" (Eysenck 819). It also does not work in naturalistic experiment because they usually evolve around a naturally-occurring event (for example a natural disaster). So the experimental method proves to be the most suitable out of all other methods for replication. ...read more.


However even laboratory experiments, like the Milgram and the Stanford Prison experiments have been regarded ethically unacceptable (Eysenck 787). In the Milgram experiment the participants were lied to, thinking they were shocking a person up to 450 volts electricity, while it was actually just an actor pretending to feel pain. In the Stanford Prison experiment the participants were mentally, emotionally and physically harmed, even though Zimbardo (who led the experiment) had them sign a consent form and held debriefing sessions. Even though these experiments were debated unethical, they showed us significant insight into human behavior, which could not have been achieved with other methods or hypothesis. Today, psychologists have "become more aware of their social responsibilities towards the individual research participant" (Eysenck 787). Altogether the experimental method relies on a tight control of the variables, and a valid manipulation of the independent variable to investigate the cause and effect, described in the hypothesis. It is difficult to avoid confounding variables that could disrupt the experiment completely and therefore it is also difficult to replicate it accurately. Experimenters also need to follow distinct rules to provide ethically acceptable experiments, which can make it difficult to investigate certain hypothesis. However the experiment is the only method that is closest to providing the most accurate results and is the most commonly among psychologists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Psychology essays

  1. IA stroop effect

    However, in laboratory experimentation, control over all the variables is impossible; and the artificial conditions may produce unnatural behaviour that lacks ecological validity, Hill (1998). The research methodology was simple as each participant repeated the two reading trials twice. The nationality of the individual participants did not lead to any bias, as it was not considered.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of categorical organisation on the recall of words ...

    From the mean and median suggested the experimental hypothesis (H�) was correct. The Mann-Whitney U test is the more accurate statistical test therefore the results show more proof of which hypothesis is correct. The result of the Mann-Whitney test was that the null hypothesis (H�)

  1. IB Revision Psych

    to associate the two things and salivate when it saw the light. It then salivated when it saw the light even if it was not given food. This was its conditioned response." Unlearning (extinction) is slower than learning - Extinction: when the association between the Conditioned stimulus and the Conditioned response is lost.

  2. An experiment investigating the effect of background music on students ability to recall a ...

    The participants were divided randomly by picking a group from a hat, with each group containing a total of 10 participants. Participants gave informed consent to the experiment, and consent was also obtained from their parents. The participants were from various nationalities and backgrounds.

  1. Anger and Aggression in Males and Females

    When a person is not likely to do so, they are under a threat that other members of the society would not accept them. Therefore, majority of people follow gender social norms and do not in most cases feel restrained by them.

  2. A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier by Ishmael Beah--A Psychological Analysis ...

    I am not a soldier anymore; I am a child?I joined the army to avenge the deaths of my family and to survive, but I?ve come to learn that if I am going to take revenge, in that process I will kill another person whose family will want revenge; then

  1. Example of a field experiment - Piliavin et al, 1969 A victim collapses on ...

    Since participants are unaware of the experiment (deception), and have not given their informed consent, a field experiment has questionable ethics. Piliavin et al, 1969 A victim collapses on the subway during a non-stop 7½-minute journey, some time between the hours of 11 a.m.

  2. Psychology biological level of analysis revision

    Nor epinephrine is usually excitatory but in some parts of the brain, it is inhibitory. Serotonin is a NT involved in many functions including mood, appetite and sensory perception. In the spinal cord, serotonin is inhibitory in pain pathways. Demonstrate Effects of Neurotransmission Using 3 Examples with Supporting Key Studies

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work