• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate the experiment as a research methodology.

Extracts from this document...


Describe and evaluate the experiment as a research methodology. The experimental method is one of the most common psychological enquiries used by psychologists. In the experiment a theory generates different hypothesis, or predictions, that are tested by collecting data. It is the only method that investigated the concept of 'cause and effect' by manipulating the independent variable (IV) which affects the dependant variable (DV). However, to enable the experiment to work, all other variables have to be controlled; otherwise confounding variables may occur. A controlled experiment can be replicated, which is a great advantage in psychology, to test previous results. Some disadvantages are the ethics concerned, which can make it difficult to perform the experiment properly. To analyze this method properly we have to look at other methods such as natural experiments, naturalistic observation or correlational studies. The experimental method depends on the manipulation of the independent variable while all others are kept constant, to investigate a causal relationship. The hypothesis predicts this, and data is collected to see if the independent variable (the cause) affected the dependant variable (the effect). ...read more.


However, it is hard to accurately achieve this, since the experiment has to be controlled and confounding variables avoided. For example, in the subway investigation by Piliavin et al, the cause was the appearance of the 'victim' collapsing and the effect was the participant's reaction towards helping the victim. The drunk victim received far less help than the cane victim and demonstrates a causal effect of the appearance towards the behavior Another strength of this method is the ability to replicate a previous experiment. In theory, if the experiment was controlled and had no confounding variables you would be able to repeat it and find the same results. Even though this is extremely hard to do, it is easiest with the experimental. It is much harder to replicate a quasi-experiment for example because the "manipulation of the independent variable is often not in the control of the experimenter" (Eysenck 819). It also does not work in naturalistic experiment because they usually evolve around a naturally-occurring event (for example a natural disaster). So the experimental method proves to be the most suitable out of all other methods for replication. ...read more.


However even laboratory experiments, like the Milgram and the Stanford Prison experiments have been regarded ethically unacceptable (Eysenck 787). In the Milgram experiment the participants were lied to, thinking they were shocking a person up to 450 volts electricity, while it was actually just an actor pretending to feel pain. In the Stanford Prison experiment the participants were mentally, emotionally and physically harmed, even though Zimbardo (who led the experiment) had them sign a consent form and held debriefing sessions. Even though these experiments were debated unethical, they showed us significant insight into human behavior, which could not have been achieved with other methods or hypothesis. Today, psychologists have "become more aware of their social responsibilities towards the individual research participant" (Eysenck 787). Altogether the experimental method relies on a tight control of the variables, and a valid manipulation of the independent variable to investigate the cause and effect, described in the hypothesis. It is difficult to avoid confounding variables that could disrupt the experiment completely and therefore it is also difficult to replicate it accurately. Experimenters also need to follow distinct rules to provide ethically acceptable experiments, which can make it difficult to investigate certain hypothesis. However the experiment is the only method that is closest to providing the most accurate results and is the most commonly among psychologists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Psychology essays

  1. An experiment investigating the effect of background music on students ability to recall a ...

    and once the two minutes you are given to recall the words is up we will notify you. Remember that at any time you can withdraw from the experiment and your answers will not count towards the final results. Does anyone have any questions?

  2. Psychology Experiment. The study that is being replicated is the first experiment of J.R. ...

    Because the participant had no free periods and was only able to do the experiment during that period, people may have spoken about the nature of the study before they were asked to participate. Since St. Edmund's is on a busy avenue, car noises and people talking would have an effect on the participant's ability to concentrate.

  1. IA stroop effect

    School handout. * Bower, B. (1992). Brother Stroop's enduring effect - J. Ridley Stroop, experimental psychology. Science News. Volume 141, pages 312 -316. Found at http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Brother+Stroop's+enduring+effect-a012249057. Last updated: unknown. Viewed 19 February 2010. * MacLeod, C. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of categorical organisation on the recall of words ...

    Firstly the mean of words recalled was calculated for both condition A and condition B. Comparing the mean values showed that the participants in Condition A recalled more words than students in condition B. On average the participants in condition A recalled 2 more words than the participants in condition B, the median values showed this.

  1. Internal Assessment on Stroop Effect

    Once both trials are done and all data has been recorded, the experimenter must debrief the participants based on the standardized sheet provided. Results The raw data for each participant is recorded in tabular form in the appendices. In order to make comparisons, the data was divided into two groups for each test: 14 year olds and 15 year olds.

  2. Ethics In Psychology

    a subject being painfully shocked was achieved through the use of pre-recorded sound bites and the "learner" banging on the wall as the voltage increased. At some stage during the experiment, the banging and all other responses by the learner would cease.

  1. This experiment investigated the effect of the presence of others on the number of ...

    This is known as the audience effect and has been demonstrated in a variety of species (Zajonc, 1965). The earliest published research conducted on social facilitation is attributed to Norman Triplett in 1898. Triplett observed that among bicycle racers, the presence of other cyclists tended to improve overall performance, leading to faster race times.

  2. An experiment to investigate the difference in performance of participants doing a puzzle alone ...

    side by side, where the participant's task was simply to reel string as fast as possible. Forty children were tested under two performance conditions, working alone or working in competitive pairs. About half of the participants in the experiment performed better, where they reeled faster, when they were in-group situation than when they were alone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work