• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

Psychology Experiment. The study that is being replicated is the first experiment of J.R. Stroops The Stroop Effect, which involved the effect of interfering color stimuli upon reading names of colors serially.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction In a study of cognitive interference, J. Stroop was able to exemplify that when two stimuli are occurring simultaneously, brains will only be able to respond to one, and thus the verbalization process is compromised. Redding and Gerjets showed that manually responding to stimuli had a greater or lesser effect on the interference, showing that responding manually to a stimulus would be able to occur more quickly while making more errors. The study that is being replicated is the first experiment of J.R. Stroop's The Stroop Effect, which involved the effect of interfering color stimuli upon reading names of colors serially. Mr. Stroop placed colors into two groups; reading colors that were in a color that was not the same as the color of the word themselves, and reading color names printed in black. The result was that participants were able to say the word faster and with less errors in reading words written in black. Less interference allowed the participants to perform better. The aim of this experiment is to show that cognitive interference occurs when someone is faced with two stimuli at the same time. Method Design This experiment used a repeated measures design to show the effect the two different sets of words would have on the ability of a person to verbally respond. ...read more.


It is evident that it took longer to read each word; in the ones printed in black, on average, a participant would take .38 seconds, (rounded to the nearest hundredth) and would take .44 seconds per word on the words that were printed in colors other than that of themselves. Discussion In the original Stroop effect, J.R. Stroop used 100 words for the colors printed in black and the ones printed in colors; in this experiment, 36 words were used for each, so the time it took would evidently be longer with J.R. Stroop. In the experiment he performed, he saw it took each participant .41 seconds to read each word printed in black, and .43 seconds to read each word printed in color. In this experiment, the results were similar. On average, it took .38 seconds to read each word, in the words printed in black and .44 seconds to read the ones printed in colors. *To account for errors that were left uncorrected, a participant's time was divided by the amount of words of the sheet, 36, and for each word, that time was doubled, also done by Stroop. There is a slight difference in the quickness of reading the black words from this experiment to J.R. ...read more.


In the original experiment, when the color of the word was different than that of the actual word, it took the participants longer to read the set of given words. When the words were read in normal black ink, it took less time than in a color other than the word. The results of the experiment that you participated in coincided with the expected results. Appendix VI- Raw Data Participants Sheet in colors in black in seconds Sheet in colors that were different in seconds 1 14.62 18.12 2 14.21 15.73 3 14.48 17.47 4 14.38 16.13 5 12.29 13.43 6 14.53 23.32* 7 11.75 14.16 8 10.93 12.00 9 14.92 16.67 10 13.22 12.63 11 13.17 19.50 12 13.55 14.44 13 13.54 13.85 14 13.49 15.25 15 16.50 17.00 See * in discussion Appendix VII -formulas and calculations Mean = total number of times of participants ------------------------------------------------- total number of participants 18.12 15.73 17.47 16.13 13.43 23.32* 14.16 12.00 16.67 12.63 19.50 14.44 13.85 15.25 +17.00 for words printed in black for words printed in colors 14.62 14.21 14.48 14.38 12.29 14.53 11.75 10.93 14.92 13.22 13.17 13.55 13.54 13.49 +16.50 = 205.58 / 15 = 13.7053333--> rounded to 13.705 = 239.71 / 15 = 15.9800--> rounded to 15.980 13.705/ 36 = .3807 --> .38 (seconds per word) 15.980/ 36 = .4438--> .44 (seconds per word) Zaza 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Psychology essays

  1. Primacy Effect in First Impression

    Asch's study suggests that if positive things are placed first in a description, then they dominate the whole portrayal which results in an overall positive impression and vice versa. The study is therefore key in describing how the formation of first impressions works and has been part in supporting the primacy effect theory which makes it worthwhile replicating.

  2. Internal Assessment on Stroop Effect

    In our partial replication of John Ridley Stroop's experiment, these conflicting stimuli were investigated, and the outcome was later known as the Stroop Effect. This experiment compares the reaction time between reading out colors and identifying the ink in which they are written on a card.

  1. IA stroop effect

    reported that it was quicker and easier to read words than to name objects and colours aloud, Bower (1992). This experiment anticipated that the words would influence the ability of the participants to name the colour. The cognitive interference is explained by two possible theories4: * Speed of Processing Theory:

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of categorical organisation on the recall of words ...

    will be debriefed and that they will not come under any distress or harm during this experiment. Although the consent will not enable the participants to be fully informed as there was justified deception. The deception will enable the participants to recall the words using their honest memory capacity and

  1. IB Psychology Experiment - Our aim is to determine the effect of gender on ...

    Our experimental hypothesis is that the gender of the participants affects their awareness level and our null hypothesis is if the gender of participants affects the participants' awareness level than it is due to chance. A research was that difference genders have different awareness levels.

  2. An Investigation of the Effect the Presence of Different Genres of Music Have on ...

    The major random error that occurred was the subjects were in a room filled with a class performing different tasks, which caused both visual and auditory distraction since people were moving around and talking. This added another distraction to the subjects and it is uncertain if the subjects were distracted by them or not.

  1. An experiment investigating the effect of background music on students ability to recall a ...

    The participants were separated into four groups, one of which was exposed to music during both the memorization and the recall periods; one had music playing during the studying period; the third group had music during the recall period and the final group were not presented with any music.

  2. Psychology IB Abnormal Notes and Essay Plans

    Problem using this statistic of bell curves because some things are statistically normal (obesity) but is not desirable or healthy behaviors 2. Some people may describe abnormality as something different from usual 1. How about people who are over 2 m 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work