• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“God may have separated the heavens from the earth. He did not separate astronomy from marine biology.” (Jonathan Levy) To what extent are the classifications separating Areas of Knowledge justified?

Extracts from this document...


"God may have separated the heavens from the earth. He did not separate astronomy from marine biology." (Jonathan Levy) To what extent are the classifications separating Areas of Knowledge justified? The International Baccalaureate subject areas are divided into natural sciences, human sciences, history, mathematics, ethics and the arts. Both astronomy and marine biology fall under the natural sciences. Jonathan Levy would therefore have little argument with these classifications. However, to what extent can we justify these divisions? Although the areas are separated into distinct subject matters, they often overlap in their content and the way we approach our learning. However, while these areas of knowledge share many ways of knowing, it is necessary to separate them for practical purposes. Moreover, in our own learning we recognise their differences. Of all the areas of knowledge, mathematics and natural sciences are the most that are based on reasoning as a way of knowing. Science is reliable, precise, objective, testable, and self-correcting1. Natural science uses a consistent scientific method that tries to reach objectivity and precision. One branch of mathematics is a relatively simple and precise field: logic through the use of numbers, where it is utilitarian and deals with the problems of the physical world2. ...read more.


This makes it almost impossible to separate ethical knowledge from the human sciences. Indeed, ethical concerns inter disperse all areas of knowledge. Ethical choices often need to be made, for example in the case of stem cell research in biology. Some believe it is morally right to further research in this area, as it can greatly help or cure people who are sick, injured or disabled. On the other hand, some believe that it is wrong to exploit and destroy that which could potentially be a person (as stem cell research requires the removal of stem cells from an embryo, destroying the embryo in the process). Mathematics and natural sciences are not always objective, nor is any other area of knowledge. We must consider ethical implications of our actions in all fields of research, even those based on reason and logic, because these rules govern our way of life. Natural science is invaluable in the pursuit of historical fact. Forensic science uses specialist techniques in crime detection to recreate history using the scientific method. This means we cannot disregard science when studying history, because so much of what we know about history is discovered through the natural sciences. ...read more.


Knowledge is so vast, and in order to study in depth a topic, we must specialise. For example, at a year 12 level, an IB English teacher could never teach IB Physics unless he/she had studied physics. Also, libraries use the Dewey Decimal System7 to organise their collection of easy retrieval. Universities also classify knowledge into distinct areas: science and the arts. The depth of knowledge one learns at university level makes it essential to break down areas of knowledge into specialised subjects, due to the vastness of knowledge. However, the broader Areas of Knowledge classifications, such as the Natural Sciences, allow for diverse subjects such as astronomy and marine biology under the same heading, focusing on their similarities rather than their differences. I think that therefore they are flexible enough for our purposes in our education. To conclude, the areas of knowledge must be divided for practical purposes, but nonetheless are all interlinked. However, we know, when studying that they are distinct, albeit with similarities in our approach to learning. Although all areas rely on each other, we have found a way to separate these areas, mainly for convenience. Thus, the classifications dividing the areas of knowledge are not always justified; they are a division by humans to make education and knowledge, amongst other things, more manageable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    Lastly, when comparing our approach to knowledge about the past and our approach to knowledge about the future, we have to keep in mind the factors of hindsight and foresight. Hindsight of the past is the equivalent of foresight for the future, and thus can be used as a tool

  2. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Humans are visually oriented and use their smell the least. Empiricism - school of philosophy that says all knowledge is based on perceptual experience Common-sense realism - a theory according to which perception is passive and only gives us an accurate image of reality.

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    that mathematics is 'absolute' will differ from someone with less mathematical experience. One should note the fact that the way of knowing, language, that mathematics is universally recognized all over the world (the same symbols and numbers are used everywhere).

  2. In Areas of Knowledge Such As the Arts and the Sciences, Do We Learn ...

    This is exemplified by the wave-particle duality theory in physics. Sir Isaac Newton6, in 1704, stated that when you shine ultraviolet light on a piece of metal you can see electrons shooting off. The only way the mathematics works out, for this to be able to happen, is if

  1. The Earth is Flat

    and this implies that the earth is round -we've seen the earth from space and so we can see the entirety of it. If the earth was flat then we would have been able to see the whole surface area of the land that we have inhabited.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

    In the arts, this scenario is especially prevalent as scholars can make better interpretations than ordinary individuals about works of art. Unlike the mostly uniform quality of "hard" truths in mathematics, the quality of "soft" truths in the arts depends heavily upon the individual making the claim and his or her background.

  1. TOK. Consider the extent to which complete certainty might be achievable in mathematics and ...

    Seeing what can?t be seen 2. Being seen by the seen 3. Seeing what you want see. Scientists tend to concentrate on objects that can?t be seen, and tend to have different views of the matter. Secondly, the subject might know that he/she is being watch end and might tend

  2. TOK Essay - Can we trust reason in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider 2 ...

    Last week, at a dinner party, my cousins and I were listening to Beethoven?s Symphony 6. After 15 minutes, I had tears in my eyes whereas my cousins were probably not as emotively carried away by the piece. Being classically trained in Piano symphonies and being a music connoisseur all

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work