• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“God may have separated the heavens from the earth. He did not separate astronomy from marine biology.” (Jonathan Levy) To what extent are the classifications separating Areas of Knowledge justified?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"God may have separated the heavens from the earth. He did not separate astronomy from marine biology." (Jonathan Levy) To what extent are the classifications separating Areas of Knowledge justified? The International Baccalaureate subject areas are divided into natural sciences, human sciences, history, mathematics, ethics and the arts. Both astronomy and marine biology fall under the natural sciences. Jonathan Levy would therefore have little argument with these classifications. However, to what extent can we justify these divisions? Although the areas are separated into distinct subject matters, they often overlap in their content and the way we approach our learning. However, while these areas of knowledge share many ways of knowing, it is necessary to separate them for practical purposes. Moreover, in our own learning we recognise their differences. Of all the areas of knowledge, mathematics and natural sciences are the most that are based on reasoning as a way of knowing. Science is reliable, precise, objective, testable, and self-correcting1. Natural science uses a consistent scientific method that tries to reach objectivity and precision. One branch of mathematics is a relatively simple and precise field: logic through the use of numbers, where it is utilitarian and deals with the problems of the physical world2. ...read more.

Middle

This makes it almost impossible to separate ethical knowledge from the human sciences. Indeed, ethical concerns inter disperse all areas of knowledge. Ethical choices often need to be made, for example in the case of stem cell research in biology. Some believe it is morally right to further research in this area, as it can greatly help or cure people who are sick, injured or disabled. On the other hand, some believe that it is wrong to exploit and destroy that which could potentially be a person (as stem cell research requires the removal of stem cells from an embryo, destroying the embryo in the process). Mathematics and natural sciences are not always objective, nor is any other area of knowledge. We must consider ethical implications of our actions in all fields of research, even those based on reason and logic, because these rules govern our way of life. Natural science is invaluable in the pursuit of historical fact. Forensic science uses specialist techniques in crime detection to recreate history using the scientific method. This means we cannot disregard science when studying history, because so much of what we know about history is discovered through the natural sciences. ...read more.

Conclusion

Knowledge is so vast, and in order to study in depth a topic, we must specialise. For example, at a year 12 level, an IB English teacher could never teach IB Physics unless he/she had studied physics. Also, libraries use the Dewey Decimal System7 to organise their collection of easy retrieval. Universities also classify knowledge into distinct areas: science and the arts. The depth of knowledge one learns at university level makes it essential to break down areas of knowledge into specialised subjects, due to the vastness of knowledge. However, the broader Areas of Knowledge classifications, such as the Natural Sciences, allow for diverse subjects such as astronomy and marine biology under the same heading, focusing on their similarities rather than their differences. I think that therefore they are flexible enough for our purposes in our education. To conclude, the areas of knowledge must be divided for practical purposes, but nonetheless are all interlinked. However, we know, when studying that they are distinct, albeit with similarities in our approach to learning. Although all areas rely on each other, we have found a way to separate these areas, mainly for convenience. Thus, the classifications dividing the areas of knowledge are not always justified; they are a division by humans to make education and knowledge, amongst other things, more manageable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    Because it is a universally accepted 'language' that further emphasizes that it is a universal truth. Though there are exceptions in mathematics in discovering the truth, one comes to the conclusion that mathematics is still an absolute truth because the numerical relationships that exists in mathematics is the for the most part objective.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

    After much research on the painting and the painter I interpreted the distortion further by stating El Greco's possible motives. The knowledge of the painter's background allowed me to formulate a more profound truth. Thus, the qualities of our truths varied because, based off prior knowledge, we knew different facts about El Greco.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    Similarly to the issue of creationism versus evolution, disagreements between the two differing perspectives are unlikely to aid in the pursuit of knowledge as a whole. The productivity of the disagreement relies upon the basis of each individuals argument, therefore when the basis of the arguments are so different, for

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    much profit as possible a customer may tend to dough as many privileges as possible even if they are undue. Many a time it so happened that I disagreed with my science teachers while discussing a concept. This disagreement gave me an edge as when the teachers discussed the concept

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    A scientific method consists of observation, hypothesizing and experiments. This is followed by the creation of a law that ultimately accumulates into a theory. The proposed law must be controllable, measurable, and repeatable to be considered a natural science. Disagreement may arise in terms of the set-up of experiment, procedure, collection of data or analysis.

  2. TOK. Consider the extent to which complete certainty might be achievable in mathematics and ...

    Seeing what can?t be seen 2. Being seen by the seen 3. Seeing what you want see. Scientists tend to concentrate on objects that can?t be seen, and tend to have different views of the matter. Secondly, the subject might know that he/she is being watch end and might tend

  1. To what extent are areas of knowledge shaped by their past? Consider with reference ...

    These social norms trickle down to religious practices and rituals, as represented by each religious follower's personal decision to ignore that particular passage in their religious text. In this way, religion is not a static construct of the past but an evolving belief system that changes in response to informed

  2. TOK Essay - Can we trust reason in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider 2 ...

    Cannot anything be reasoned to suit one?s own convenient theories? Let?s explore the trustworthiness of reason in Arts. When a knower armed with the faculty of reason (sense perception granted) stares at Pollock?s drip paintings (Image 1) or Ad Reinhardt?s abstract paintings (Image 2), the knower might attribute the drips

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work