• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“True statements cannot become false, nor can false statements become true”.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"True Statements Cannot Become False, Nor Can False Statements Become True" At first glance, the title of this essay may very well be seen as a joke. How can the validity of statements change? The fact is, the validity of statements can change entirely, depending on the reader's point of view with regard to the statement. Although the sentence may seem straightforward and not at all complicated, there is much more to the declaration above than meets the eye, as the validity of the statement depends almost wholly on how it is interpreted by the reader. In this essay, I will discuss the validity of this statement based on several different possible interpretations of the title sentence. The first interpretation of the title sentence is that once a statement is made, an identical statement made at a different time cannot be considered to be the same statement. So, the statements "Black is not white" and "Black is not white" are not the same statement, merely duplicates. ...read more.

Middle

However, since the interpretation of the title sentence we are considering says that statements can only be verified by checking them against facts that were true when the statement was said, the statement "I live in Indonesia", uttered by myself during August of 2002, will remain true for eternity. Under this interpretation, the validity of statements cannot change over time, as a statement can only be classified as true or false using the circumstances and facts present at the time that the statement was made. Yet another interpretation of the title is the opposite of the first, saying that identical statements made at different times can be considered as the same. Under this ideology, "Black is not white" and "Black is not white" are one and the same. For this interpretation of the title, we will use the example "Philadelphia is the capital of the United States of America". Were this statement made in 1794, when Philadelphia was indeed the capital of the United States, it would obviously be considered true. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, under this interpretation of the title, the validity of statement can change over time. As is evident, there are many possible interpretations of the title statement, with just a few being discussed here. As one can see, the validity of the title can change drastically, depending on how the reader sees and interprets the statement. Under two of the more pragmatic and realistic interpretations, that identical statements made at different times are not the same, and that the validity of the statements can be considered only using the facts and circumstances that were present at the time the statement was made, true statements cannot become false, nor can false statements become true. Under two other not-as-realistic ideologies, that identical statements made at different times can be considered as the same, and that the validity of a statement can be checked using circumstances from a different time, true statements can become false, as can false statements become true. Therefore, the validity of the title sentence depends entirely on how the reader understands it. 1067 Words Aakash Dheer IB1 TOK 11/3/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    Repetition comes into play in history in the gathering and analyzing stage of a historian's work where they attempt to get closer to the truth. Through the analysis of a multitude of sources, historians are able to establish truths regarding a historical event.

  2. Knowledge is a true organ of sight

    These sources, in Panchatantra quote seen as organs, in my opinion consist of anything that helps contribute to creating the full image. These organs can consist of knowledge, eyes, nose, hands, and ears. All these organs since I think all these factors contribute to making an image of something.

  1. "What I tell you three times is true" (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula- or ...

    Historical events have a certain time and place. You cannot duplicate, repeat, and test them, as in science (Abel 111). What we call historical knowledge is based on different interpretations or opinions of what happened in the past. Various historians have different views on one event, which they support with accepted evidence and facts.

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    various ways of knowing and areas of knowledge like history and the arts. Since all knowledge has to pass our subjective minds to finally become knowledge, we can all knowledge as a blend between objectivity and subjectivity. The topic of the essay itself is penned in such a manner that

  1. There are no distinctions between what is true and false, Discuss with relation to ...

    It is important to acknowledge the different histories but we need to say that there is a historical truth. There is no single right or wrong history for Australia; both the histories are considered true because both the event of ?finding new land? and ?Invasion? took place but the opposing parties have different perspectives which must be respected and recognized.

  2. Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes". Discuss.

    This means that when seeing something they use knowledge from science to process what it really is. And is why that we now understand that objects are composed of atoms and molecules and what we see is just the bumping of charged particles together in a certain shape to form objects such as desks, chairs etc.

  1. Theory of Knowledge: There is no distinction between true or false. Discuss

    There are facts about people today; they have no perseverance, do not want to feel any pains but an easy life where everything is solved instantly. Sales Bury Harrison says: ?There is no shortcut to life, to the end of our days life is a lesson imperfectly learn? and Antrim

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss

    However, who knows in the future humans became really big and gives birth to a giant baby. As the baby grows, their cells shrink and become normal. There is much possibility. However, it isn?t our absolute truth now. We aren?t omnipotent and what we know may just be the truth

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work