• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“True statements cannot become false, nor can false statements become true”.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"True Statements Cannot Become False, Nor Can False Statements Become True" At first glance, the title of this essay may very well be seen as a joke. How can the validity of statements change? The fact is, the validity of statements can change entirely, depending on the reader's point of view with regard to the statement. Although the sentence may seem straightforward and not at all complicated, there is much more to the declaration above than meets the eye, as the validity of the statement depends almost wholly on how it is interpreted by the reader. In this essay, I will discuss the validity of this statement based on several different possible interpretations of the title sentence. The first interpretation of the title sentence is that once a statement is made, an identical statement made at a different time cannot be considered to be the same statement. So, the statements "Black is not white" and "Black is not white" are not the same statement, merely duplicates. ...read more.

Middle

However, since the interpretation of the title sentence we are considering says that statements can only be verified by checking them against facts that were true when the statement was said, the statement "I live in Indonesia", uttered by myself during August of 2002, will remain true for eternity. Under this interpretation, the validity of statements cannot change over time, as a statement can only be classified as true or false using the circumstances and facts present at the time that the statement was made. Yet another interpretation of the title is the opposite of the first, saying that identical statements made at different times can be considered as the same. Under this ideology, "Black is not white" and "Black is not white" are one and the same. For this interpretation of the title, we will use the example "Philadelphia is the capital of the United States of America". Were this statement made in 1794, when Philadelphia was indeed the capital of the United States, it would obviously be considered true. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, under this interpretation of the title, the validity of statement can change over time. As is evident, there are many possible interpretations of the title statement, with just a few being discussed here. As one can see, the validity of the title can change drastically, depending on how the reader sees and interprets the statement. Under two of the more pragmatic and realistic interpretations, that identical statements made at different times are not the same, and that the validity of the statements can be considered only using the facts and circumstances that were present at the time the statement was made, true statements cannot become false, nor can false statements become true. Under two other not-as-realistic ideologies, that identical statements made at different times can be considered as the same, and that the validity of a statement can be checked using circumstances from a different time, true statements can become false, as can false statements become true. Therefore, the validity of the title sentence depends entirely on how the reader understands it. 1067 Words Aakash Dheer IB1 TOK 11/3/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    In this regard, the first reading encourages some extent of objectivity unlike the second. 'There are absolutely no distinctions between what is true and what is false' is purely a subjectivist's opinion regarding truth. Although this is a very common subconscious belief, we still have to recognise the various implications.

  2. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    Reason is present in this area of knowledge in the historians' initial work of gathering and analyzing sources to reach a conclusion assumed to be just for all. Yet errors in reasoning are present in history, indicated by hasty generalization whereby a historian, after reading just one source, makes a general conclusion.

  1. Outline of There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is ...

    theory that we learn and we apply the theory that we learn to answer the question. * For example: "The first person to estimate the actual number of particles in a given amount of a substance was Josef Loschmidt, an Austrian high school teacher who later became a professor at the University of Vienna."

  2. "What I tell you three times is true." (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula - ...

    A dictator may use propaganda to get a person to believe something that is not necessarily true. In a more modern day context, this may best be represented throughout the perceptual filtering of the truth by the media, where the 'facts' of a current event are filtered, to affect the individual.

  1. Knowledge is a true organ of sight

    the fact that without at least some previous knowledge what one will see make no sense at all. What we see becomes relevant due to the knowledge we have, but if one had no initial knowledge nothing would be relevant, therefore knowledge was gained thru initial analyzation by different sources.

  2. "What I tell you three times is true" (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula- or ...

    Historical events have a certain time and place. You cannot duplicate, repeat, and test them, as in science (Abel 111). What we call historical knowledge is based on different interpretations or opinions of what happened in the past. Various historians have different views on one event, which they support with accepted evidence and facts.

  1. There are no distinctions between what is true and false, Discuss with relation to ...

    From an outsider?s point of view, this is a biased argument. Like this, many peoples are influenced to have a biased opinion because of their government?s ideas and judgement on a particular event.

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss

    of the present and past but not the future, the ?real absolute? truth. History is founded by historians and archeologists are trying to obtain it by discovering scriptures, evidences to support events that happened in the past. They sometimes add their own imagination or assumptions which seems ?humanly? and ?logical? to fill the gaps in missing scriptures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work