• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what sense, if any, can a machine be said to know something? How can anyone believe that a machine can think?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"In what sense, if any, can a machine be said to know something? How can anyone believe that a machine can think?" A knowledge issue that can be derived from this question is: do mathematical predictions obtained by machines such as computers or calculators constitute knowledge? One claim to this issue is that mathematical knowledge must be true because it corresponds to phenomena predicted by formulas and mathematical belief. For example, in the field of demography, models and formulas can be used to predict the growth and decay of populations. Mathematical information is critical to such predictions. By evaluating existing phenomena in population growth, computer models sanctioned by the UN were able to give the exact date that the world population surpassed six billion, on October 12, 1999 years in advance. ...read more.

Middle

Wrong predictions also conflict with Plato's definition of truth which holds that truth must be eternal. Once proven wrong, the truth is no longer eternal. Source: "World at Six Billion." UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations, n.d. Web. 19 Jan 2011. <http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/sixbillion/sixbillio n.htm#top>. "Does making a knowledge claim carry any particular obligation or responsibility for the knower?" A knowledge issue that can be derived from this is: how important is the sharing of individual knowledge to the advancement of human knowledge as a whole? One claim that can be made is that without the communication of knowledge, people will continue to hold false beliefs and no advancement can be made. For example, the ancient Greek view of the brain, originally held by Aristotle, maintained that the heart was the center of intellect and the brain was simply responsible for the cooling of blood heated by the heart. ...read more.

Conclusion

An implication of this claim is that only one person will attain a certain bit of knowledge. This is not necessarily true. A counterclaim is that more than one person can know the same bit of knowledge without any communication between the two. Someone other than Galen might have conducted experiments and found the true function of the brain. However, if that other scientist had not communicated that knowledge to the community of knowers, most other thinkers would not know the truth. Thus, if knowledge is not common and spread amongst the community, no advancement can be made as a whole. If only a select few people know the truth, there are still others who do not and continue to perpetuate false beliefs, and the community as a whole cannot make further advancement. Source: F., Mark, Barry W., and Michael A. Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. 3. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007. 5-7. Print. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. People Need To Believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events

    People wanting, probably because of their need for it, to find order will find it in every example even when it is not there. On the other hand if confirmation bias is what rules the people the general assumption would be that everything always would be in order- which it of course is not.

  2. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    It would be impractical to prove that God exists if this means to demonstrate in a way that nobody can question. The other type of evidence is indirect, which we already accept as truth as it fits in with what we claim to know.4 This is frequently referred to as

  1. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    This is why it was very commonly in the past. However in reality it has a number of real life uses. By showing that something is equal to a complex number that is not real, acts as a method of disproving and hence complex numbers are actually pretty useful.

  2. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.(Christopher Hitchens) Do ...

    In the world of art, the context of our situation completely influences our view of a piece of art, and the evidence they use to support it. Art is more or less marked by a subjective nature, which means that any opinion of art and it?s supporting reasoning is entirely tied to the context of the observer.

  1. Can a Machine Know?

    But is this a good thing? Do we want this self-developing machine to track our footpath on the internet until it knows everything about us? In a somewhat unorthodox situation let?s consider the film ?iRobot?. This film could be basically showing us our future where robots are essentially our slaves and live amongst us.

  2. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    Also as a knower, I understand that Mathematics is not always evidential but conceptual also. In fact, Alexander Bogomolny stresses the fact that drills and proofs make Math tedious. ??if it's possible at all for a layman to acquire an appreciation of math, it's only possible through a consistent exposure

  1. Can a machine know?

    The main point to the argument is that a machine possesses knowledge to carry out its intended task is the assumption that the machine components when working together in synchronize mode, somehow transforms into the knowledge of the machine, as they together makes the machine work.

  2. Can a Machine Know? TOK essay.

    I as a fluent Chinese speaker have good reasons to consider myself to know Chinese because I can recall the rules of the language from my memory and use my perception and senses to receive and respond to a conversation in Chinese.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work