• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the artist. To what extent, then, can a historian be confident about his or her conclusions?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History is an account of what happened in the past. It provides an explanation of what happed in the past, so we can learn from our ancestors, about their successes and mistakes. What type of knowledge do we gain from this? Is it the objective knowledge of a scientist or the subjective knowledge of an artist? Perhaps it is a mixture of both scientific and artistic, or, in extension objective and subjective knowledge? But, then to what extent can one accept a historian's conclusions as the truth? First of all to define the terms so that we can see the differences. Although most people around us know what knowledge is , it is a very hard thing to define. Knowledge is often defined as expertise, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education. It can be what is known in a certain field or in total; facts or information. Is this what knowledge really is? The best I can do is that knowledge is information gained from the sources of knowledge. The sources of knowledge are sense experience, testimony, reasoning, instincts, memory, introspect, intuition and emotion. There are also different types of knowledge; practical, theoretical and rational. ...read more.

Middle

Every country always wants to hide their mistakes or never to believe that they are wrong. Like art it can all depend on what the reader gets out of it. Scientific and Artistic are both strong forms of knowledge, in which the knower has a high degree of confidence about his conclusions, but wouldn't some aspects weaken each other when they are cross-bred like in history? Admittedly, all knowledge could be regarded as a combination of subjectivity and objectivity, since it needs to pass through our subjective minds to become knowledge. However, to let this limit the distinction would not be fruitful. The problem lies in the fact that history has to be the historian's choice, based on his or her interpretations. McMullin 3 Therefore, doubts can be risen as to whether the selection and interpretation process reflect the object of study and reality satisfactorily. Emotions, environment and preconceived ideas do effect a historians results. Furthermore, some historians argue that history is created the moment it happens. Primary documents are often the best form of historical records, for the person was there when it happened. Things such as diaries, letters, treaties and court decisions can be very useful when studying history. ...read more.

Conclusion

This does not mean that they can have no assurance at all, just that it can not be to the extent of a scientist or mathematician. Language can also effect history, for some important documents where written in only one language and the historian may be relying on a translation, which is just not the same. Some things are just unable to be translated and the true meaning may be lost. A historian would have to be fluent ion many languages in order to be able to use all primary documents and come to the best possible conclusions. In conclusion, the task facing a historian is a very difficult one. To say that a historian can never be confident about his or her results in reducing their work to little more that guesses. This is an exaggeration. We do need their work and we can learn a lot from it if we are open-minded and never accept the facts at face value. I completely agree with the statement " A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the artist." TOK ESSAY #4 " A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the artist." To what extent, then, can a historian be confident about his or her conclusions? Name : Chantelle McMullin Date: June 19th/08 Word count: 1291 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Assess the claim that 'we value art because it expresses the feelings of the ...

    Art allows us to share feelings and emotion as opposed to thoughts. It doesn't matter whether it has already been produced or is in the works of being so. We experience the emotion of the person who expressed it upon creation of the art - if you want to share

  2. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    Evidence and reports that show the contrary should also be presented, just like the normal argument. The rigorous and objective scientist would include the counter-evidence. Rigor in history entails objectivity and reaching a state of impartialness by having neutral perspective.

  1. In expanding the field of knowledge we but increase the horizon of ignorance.- Henry ...

    By embarking on, what he believed was going to be, a simple task of understanding why people believe such ludicrous ideas, he was met with many new paths leading further into the horizons of ignorance. It seems as if, by the end of the article Feynman had discovered, and not

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    majority of the scientific society, and adequate proofs have to be presented; otherwise it would be just a theory among many. On the other hand, artistic knowledge does not strive for universality or replicability, since it is based on the individual's experiences.

  1. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    majority of the scientific society, and adequate proofs have to be presented; otherwise it would be just a theory among many. On the other hand, artistic knowledge does not strive for universality or replicability, since it is based on the individual's 20 experiences.

  2. Historical orthodoxy's subjectivity and change

    were too tight to be complied with, and therefore may have sparked the german greviences that started the war. As such, the real situation for the people has remained the same in this situation, but as more evidence or source material becomes available, more factors can be included in an overall interpretation of a given situation.

  1. Theory of Knowledge Essay -Discuss how using different methods of justification enables one to ...

    Furthermore, ethics are "contextual" where maths is the exact opposite. In mathematics there are a set of rules that are always followed and even the exceptions of that rule are known globally and accepted after substancial evidence has been made to prove that in this application these values do not work or are not accepted.

  2. Although complete dependence on intuition is not suggested, intuition is often surprisingly accurate. But ...

    It might be true that part of our society see anorexic individuals as very attractive figures as they can become models, they are on TV and magazines and get famous. But, the fact that anorexia nervosa may lead to death has proved that becoming an anorexic is wrong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work