• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

We see and understand things not as they are but as we are. Discuss this claim in relation to at least two ways of knowing.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"We see and understand things not as they are but as we are." Word Count: 1,573 While at first thought this seems like an obvious statement, it stumbles across an idea that is at the very core of our very existence. In essence, this claim is suggesting that one's understanding of something is based on their interpretation and not as it actually is. It can be boiled down to the fact that when one gains a new understanding of something, it is based on what they already know and their personal intuition, leaving everything grounded in an inherent bias. For one 'thing' there may be hundreds of different interpretations, because of people's differing biases. This statement touches upon all four ways of knowing: reason, perception, language, and emotion. Furthermore, within these fields, it covers many of the linking ideas, including: certainty, evidence, experience, technology, interpretation, truth, and belief. In this essay I shall attempt to see under what circumstances we see and understand things as we are and under what circumstances, if any, we see things as they are, that is, a pure view of reality. In doing this I will attempt to unearth the issues of knowledge that riddle this seemingly profound statement. ...read more.

Middle

Obviously emotion will affect ethics and arts more than it affects natural sciences (from the areas of knowledge), but it is still exists on some level for all of them. Coming from a typical western culture, my emotions may not play as large a role in my understanding of something as much as someone in another culture or group on the Earth. For someone in a tribal setting, emotion and faith may play a larger role in their thought process than reason. For many people in western cultures, the opposite is true. Reason. This leads to another way of knowing, reason. When using reason to form our understanding of something, we use our logic to deduce from evidence what the truth is, the truth being "a justified true belief, not based on a lie." The important part to take from this is our belief. If one believes something to be true, and they have justified it, it is true for them. However, it may not be true for others because their logic may differ from another's logic. This gives us many different interpretations of one thing. This raises a very important issue of issue of knowledge: how can we be sure our biases are not causing our reason to be flawed? ...read more.

Conclusion

It appears to be impossible to form knowledge or understanding without having human interpretation. This is because knowledge, especially the classification of it, is something humans have invented to cope with their surroundings. These interpretations carry inherent biases. These biases, whether they are in language, emotion, reason, or perception, do exist, albeit in different scopes. These biases also differ from person to person for many reasons such as their culture, beliefs, and their world view. Essentially, we understand things as we interpret them, based on our biases and interpretation, and not how they actually are. Therefore, the claim that "we see and understand things, not as they are, but as we are", is accurate. However, due to the language-based issue of knowledge pertaining to the fact that we don't know who we are, we only have an interpretation of who we are, the claim would be more accurately put as "we see and understand things not as they are, but as we interpret ourselves to be." This can be viewed as somewhat disheartening, realizing that even in our advanced society, with all its technology and innovation, we may never be able to understand something as it actually is, rather than just how we interpret it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. We see and understand things not as they are but as we are. Discuss ...

    This is an example of emotional prejudice. Families and friends of victims of the September 11th attacks were emotionally affected, and in search of someone to blame, they ended up pointing the finger at all Muslims instead of the few people who actually carried out the attack.

  2. How does language affect the way we see things?

    This leads us to believe that we trust our senses so much when it comes to understanding language, that thoughts once deciphered are rarely reviewed again. Thus, we find it difficult to accept new discoveries and move on. On the contrary, we also have evidences that sometimes, language had very less effect.

  1. Tok Essay. We see and understand things not as they are but as we ...

    Whilst constructing this essay, my friend and I were asked a question to which we had very different answers. Neither of us was right or wrong as the answer depends on the individual's opinion. However, in the case of sense perception an opinion is not relevant as there is only one absolute form, only one answer.

  2. TOK. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something ...

    Can emotions be rational, or are rational emotions just another oxymoron? Some people think that emotions are an obstacle rather than a way of pursuing knowledge. Yet, there can be no creativity without emotions. So, to what extent should we allow our emotions to guide our perception of reality?

  1. "We see and understand things not as they are but as we are" IB ...

    of subjectivity, there would be no grounds, nor indeed any need for misunderstandings, diplomacy and claims of inherently good human nature. Predictably, there would also be a severe lack of the personality and originality that distinguishes any one individual from the next (though genetic variation and those with more acute personality traits may beg to differ).

  2. There are no distinctions between what is true and false, Discuss with relation to ...

    In reality what we believe is true could actually be false but since we have supporting evidence and faith in our claim it will be considered to be true. It is important to distinguish between what is true and what is false because if we do not, then we will

  1. Examine the Claim That It Is Possible to Attain Knowledge Despite Problems of Bias ...

    Because when there is collusion of opposing ideas, it helps speed up the recognization of clashing knowledge and then when people come together to share their knowledge or debate their knowledge, this adds to the growing and changing of the knowledge.

  2. TOK Essay. The entire accuracies of mathematics and the natural sciences rely on the ...

    As a result, we get bands in the gel of different thicknesses and frequencies, so we can differentiate between the samples. At a crime scene, if a DNA sample is found, like blood, it can be compared to samples from suspects to find the criminal and punish him accordingly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work