• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

We see and understand things not as they are but as we are. Discuss this claim in relation to at least two ways of knowing.

Extracts from this document...


"We see and understand things not as they are but as we are." Word Count: 1,573 While at first thought this seems like an obvious statement, it stumbles across an idea that is at the very core of our very existence. In essence, this claim is suggesting that one's understanding of something is based on their interpretation and not as it actually is. It can be boiled down to the fact that when one gains a new understanding of something, it is based on what they already know and their personal intuition, leaving everything grounded in an inherent bias. For one 'thing' there may be hundreds of different interpretations, because of people's differing biases. This statement touches upon all four ways of knowing: reason, perception, language, and emotion. Furthermore, within these fields, it covers many of the linking ideas, including: certainty, evidence, experience, technology, interpretation, truth, and belief. In this essay I shall attempt to see under what circumstances we see and understand things as we are and under what circumstances, if any, we see things as they are, that is, a pure view of reality. In doing this I will attempt to unearth the issues of knowledge that riddle this seemingly profound statement. ...read more.


Obviously emotion will affect ethics and arts more than it affects natural sciences (from the areas of knowledge), but it is still exists on some level for all of them. Coming from a typical western culture, my emotions may not play as large a role in my understanding of something as much as someone in another culture or group on the Earth. For someone in a tribal setting, emotion and faith may play a larger role in their thought process than reason. For many people in western cultures, the opposite is true. Reason. This leads to another way of knowing, reason. When using reason to form our understanding of something, we use our logic to deduce from evidence what the truth is, the truth being "a justified true belief, not based on a lie." The important part to take from this is our belief. If one believes something to be true, and they have justified it, it is true for them. However, it may not be true for others because their logic may differ from another's logic. This gives us many different interpretations of one thing. This raises a very important issue of issue of knowledge: how can we be sure our biases are not causing our reason to be flawed? ...read more.


It appears to be impossible to form knowledge or understanding without having human interpretation. This is because knowledge, especially the classification of it, is something humans have invented to cope with their surroundings. These interpretations carry inherent biases. These biases, whether they are in language, emotion, reason, or perception, do exist, albeit in different scopes. These biases also differ from person to person for many reasons such as their culture, beliefs, and their world view. Essentially, we understand things as we interpret them, based on our biases and interpretation, and not how they actually are. Therefore, the claim that "we see and understand things, not as they are, but as we are", is accurate. However, due to the language-based issue of knowledge pertaining to the fact that we don't know who we are, we only have an interpretation of who we are, the claim would be more accurately put as "we see and understand things not as they are, but as we interpret ourselves to be." This can be viewed as somewhat disheartening, realizing that even in our advanced society, with all its technology and innovation, we may never be able to understand something as it actually is, rather than just how we interpret it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. We see and understand things not as they are but as we are. Discuss ...

    This is an example of emotional prejudice. Families and friends of victims of the September 11th attacks were emotionally affected, and in search of someone to blame, they ended up pointing the finger at all Muslims instead of the few people who actually carried out the attack.

  2. How does language affect the way we see things?

    This leads us to believe that we trust our senses so much when it comes to understanding language, that thoughts once deciphered are rarely reviewed again. Thus, we find it difficult to accept new discoveries and move on. On the contrary, we also have evidences that sometimes, language had very less effect.

  1. What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, Knowledge is the true organ of ...

    purpose of the non-coding DNA to the name "junk DNA", which would have thus influenced people's perceptions of the non-coding DNA, it was these preconceived ideas which lead us to discover that the non-coding DNA had a purpose.

  2. Tok Essay. We see and understand things not as they are but as we ...

    Whilst constructing this essay, my friend and I were asked a question to which we had very different answers. Neither of us was right or wrong as the answer depends on the individual's opinion. However, in the case of sense perception an opinion is not relevant as there is only one absolute form, only one answer.

  1. Free essay

    "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters ...

    Many Nazis in Germanic countries believed the ethnic cleansing of Jews was their responsibility to God. People growing up and living in a culture where Nazism is exercised and strongly believed were likely to develop filters in their line of perception, which separate out innocence of Jews.

  2. Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the truth (Pablo Picasso). Evaluate ...

    between the other hundreds of other decisions they make even consciously without even thinking. But how did they portray something so vivid to an observer but disguise it as a lie within itself? If this is the case then it could be said that a professional artist has built a

  1. TOK. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something ...

    If this claim is true then it is also true that we see much less than is actually there. This proves that even though our senses are effective in the day to day processes of our lives, they are not a credible or reliable source of information.

  2. Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the truth (Pablo Picasso). Evaluate ...

    However reasoning doesn?t always help us interpret a particular piece of work for the reasons that there are some literary works in which even reasoning won?t take you to the truth. For example, Alice adventures in wonderland is a novel full of fantasy and doesn?t have anything else that?s relatable

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work