• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

You cannot study a human scientifically in the same way as you can study any other animal. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"You cannot study a human scientifically in the same way as you can study any other animal." Discuss. To fully answer the question, we must make sure we actually understand what is meant by scientifically study; when we look it up in the dictionary we get the following definition: "The use of techniques to investigate phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge." That said my feelings are divided. On one hand I totally disagree, on the other hand a major part of me sais that there must be some truth in that statement. ...read more.

Middle

Nevertheless at our level we can easily recognise if our pets are happy, hungry or even if there are tired. On the other hand there is a limitation in the study of animals. Firstly we quickly realises that the human brain is much more complex. Nevertheless during the last five decays, many philosophers and psychoanalyst have made huge discoveries about the human brain and how it works. They have done that using different techniques, for instance dream analysis; which cannot be applied to animals. ...read more.

Conclusion

things unrelated to those our senses are able to perceive, how are we to trust our rationalist thoughts if we are unsure as to whether we trusted our senses in the first place? Is there anyway we can test and prove that our senses are what we believe they are, could this become the path that our senses can lead us to truth? As a conclusion I mostly agree with the statement, nevertheless I don't exactly know it to what extend. Such conflict will only be able to solve in the future as we don't have the technology required at the moment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    he is not all powerful, if he will not, then he is not all good".10 In the Summa Theologica, Aquinas similarly wrote "if one of two contraries be infinite, the other would be altogether destroyed. But the name God means that he is infinite goodness.

  2. Human Brain is no more than a highly complex computer. Discuss

    However, the computer (Deep Blue) is limited to a certain amount of knowledge, and cannot evolve itself over time. The difference, however, between Kasparov and Deep Blue was that Deep Blue was able to remember every single step that it did along with the steps of Kasparov; it is essentially

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work