• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"All other Ways of Knowing are controlled by language."

Extracts from this document...


"All other Ways of Knowing are controlled by language." What does this statement mean and do you think it is a fair representation of the relationship between perception, emotion, reason and language? Xavier Davidson 8 November, 2008 Mr. Mathews IB Theory of Knowledge Period 6 Word Count: 1516 "All other Ways of Knowing are controlled by language." What does this statement mean and do you think it is a fair representation of the relationship between perception, emotion, reason and language? Language influences the way we think, the way we act and even the choices that we make in life. This prompt, however, asserts that language "controls" emotion, reason and perception (also known as the Ways of Knowing). The aim of this essay will be to assess what this prompt means and then to evaluate how fair a representation it is of the relationship between our four Ways of Knowing. Along the way we'll encounter several knowledge issues dealing with the nature of language and the limitations inherent in each of the four Ways of Knowing. The meaning of this statement depends, of course, on the meaning of the verb "control." If I control something, it cannot act without my explicit directions. ...read more.


What happens when a Pintupi tribesperson comes to visit me and sees a "manhole" - the opening in the street through which maintenance workers pass when they are repairing the sewer system. Might he mistake it for a very large yulpilpa? The second knowledge issue raised by this prompt involves the role of language in emotional knowing. Surely I would feel emotions in the absence of any particular language; anger and sadness are universal features of human existence. One of our case studies this year involved Genie, an abused young woman who grew up being punished every time she spoke. This treatment lasted 13 years until she escaped her father's abuse and was "rescued" by linguists and other researchers in 1971. (Nova, Genie) After years of study with Genie researchers established that she could understand words and their meanings, but she was never able to construct functional English sentences. Even after extensive therapy and study, Genie never learned to use language the way normally functioning humans who live in society use it. Yet the footage shown in the Nova video about Genie shows that she clearly had strong emotional states. One of her foster parents even got her to describe her anger or fear using her fingers - four fingers meant she was very upset, one finger meant only a little upset. ...read more.


We may never know for sure - there are inherent limits involved in knowing the true thought patterns even of people well known to us, much less strangers from an obscure tribe. But the performance of the Piraha on these cognitive tests suggests that the language we speak (and in which we think) does limit our reasoning ability. Still, to assert that language "controls" reason as a Way of Knowing goes beyond the evidence provided by this example. The Piraha showed no evidence of being incapable of reason, only of specific cognitive tasks. Language plays a role in each Way of Knowing, but to say that it controls them is not a fair representation of this complex and nuanced relationship. Language both aids and limits perception, it can contain and channel emotion and it provides the framework for reason. One could argue more fairly that language enhances the other Ways of Knowing by providing categories and "short cuts" of interpretation. Ironically even this argument is subject to a problem of circularity; because I think predominantly in language I naturally see great importance to its role in knowing. In the end all we can do is recognize that the four Ways of Knowing are largely interdependent, and that language, perception, emotion and reason work together in allowing us to make and validate our knowledge claims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    (emotion can determine it as well e.g......................................................... How can other WOK's determine language? SAPIR There is a simple test for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. If it were true, there would be a large number of sentences which could be readily expressed in one language, but would be near impossible to translate into some others.

  2. ToK presentation

    to change the fate of our world. The other theories are less publicised by the media because they are harder to believe, as it is very scary. It means that even though the world has been going through this cycle for an untold amount of centuries, we will still probably change our lifestyles drastically.

  1. "All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language." What does this ...

    The question here is if grammar is restricting the possible logical concepts that can be expressed in language, therefore limiting our knowledge. An example used to explain this is; if a child, who has never experienced pain or has not experienced pain from being kicked, is told by another child who has, "She kicked him.

  2. What power does language have

    As a result women around the world are punished and insulted for things that men believe God wants them to do, from the words they read in the Quran. Therefore some of the passages in the Quran can be identified as connotations, having different meanings to different people.

  1. Does language determine or limit thought?

    The word one of us came up with was "hotchaach". Douglas Adams, in his book "The Deeper Meaning of Liff" also came up with a word for this feeling; "shoeburyness". "How often misused words generate misleading thoughts,"13 Herbert Spencer said.

  2. Oversimplication in the Ways of Knowing

    or through the senses (he or she has seen on a map that Washington D.C. is indeed the capital of the United States). Through perception, one can come to the conclusion that Washington D.C. is the capital of the United States.

  1. Are the WOKS controlled by language?

    The language spreads, undergoes changes, and encounters other languages. Therefore we have a problem in that the syntax of language is not certain to be definite or immutable. An example would be old texts, where even though the same word might be used, the meaning of it as the writer intended, or people of their time interpreted may be different.

  2. Is it possible to justify the different ways of knowing?

    Through reasoning, people are able to make sense of both their thoughts and experiences, identifying problems and the factors influencing these problems. As such, we are able to achieve plausible and logical conclusion. For example, through observations and experiments in the natural sciences, we can prove, within reason, whether a hypothesis is true or not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work