• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

Extracts from this document...


Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions? Morality is a system of rules that modifies our behavior in social situations. It's about the doing of good instead of harm, and it sets some standard of virtuous conduct.1 However there is no formula for moral decision making. It is not a process which can easily be based on a determinate set of rules. Moreover it is important to see that good moral decision making involves more than just acting on hunches or intuitions. For this reason it can be argued that reason and emotion are both necessary components in justifying moral decisions. Good moral decision making involves, knowing the facts of the situation, and careful consideration of the moral values that are relevant to a given situation. Importantly, it involves compassion to the moral dimensions of everyday situations, and an awareness of the range of interests involved in specific decisions; Emotion and reason. Emotion is a very influential way of knowing merely because it is subconsciously used by everyone when making a decision, moral or not. Emotions are urgent and irrational impulses that come from our body; on the other hand reason is reflective analysis that comes from education and civilisation.2 I would like to use a personal experience to enhance my argument. ...read more.


Deductive logic can be used to make a premise. For instance killing human beings is wrong; human life begins when a baby is conceived; therefore abortion is wrong. Language has little merit in justifying whether abortion is the right moral diction. In order to asses the situation we must consider whose decision it is for a baby to be aborted. Language can be used to communicate each individual reason and emotion towards the matter at hand; however the most important point of view is not being taken into consideration; the unborn baby whose life is the one in question. Another way language can be used is through immediate assumptions; these assumptions also lead to judgmental perceptions. As soon as the word abortion is mentioned the majority associates it as being a wrong moral decision. It is a word more often than not is associated with a negative image; if this is the case then our perception tells us that abortion is wrong. History essentially exists so we can learn from mistakes and use them to make correct decisions for an improved future. We cannot know everything, but if we learn from the past we can balance our decisions, and agree upon the best solutions based on all input, information and considerations available. ...read more.


We could also use inductive logic. This process allows particular information to become more generalized. It is more informative than deduction but less certain. To do this we would look at the information over time and then make a generalized conclusion, this is sometimes less accurate as it is very general. Emotion is probably the biggest influence of the premature baby debate. A baby stereotypically has a big effect on people's emotion as it is so vulnerable. Our emotions take over and do not think of the many reasons as to why helping the baby with medical care could actually result in a lot of pain for both the baby and parents. In conclusion we cannot have a universal law to solve this debate as there are too many conflicting opinions by different cultures, countries and religions. This is the same for all moral decisions as there are so many reasons and background premises that can affect whether it is wrong or right. Individual cases need to be analyzed and looked at in detail for a moral decision to be the best one. Therefore Emotion and reason are both important components in justifying a moral decision, however each individual case needs to be examined to determine what is needed more to make the best decision, or if each components reason and emotion are equal to making a moral decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Emotion Vs Reason

    Emotion has such an overwhelming power on man that it imposes the speaker's beliefs on the listener. In effect this is how several dictators such as Hitler, were able to spread their views through such propaganda, with the use of emotion filled words such as 'mutterland' and such other nationalistic words.

  2. Free essay


    for a job as a helper because his mother was very ill, father had expired and he had two sisters to support. At first, my parent's emotions did not allow them to get work done from such a small boy but then their reason made them realize that if they

  1. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Neccessary in Justifying Moral Decisions?

    It would appear that emotional thought restrains human logic in the processing of moral decisions. It could be suggested that emotions are just as important as reason when justifying moral decisions if the outcome benefits a greater number of people than it harms (to a certain extent).

  2. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    Reason dictates that the right to education is a self-evident truth; education is an inalienable human right, however logically the parents' decision is justifiable. Sacrificing one or two children's education means more hope and benefit for them and the entire family.

  1. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    Therefore passionate conviction is a tool and the key to successful literature study. Passionate conviction is useful in another sense. Newton came up with the entire Newtonian physics laws (e.g. universal law of gravity, 1666) wholly out of his passionate conviction (his curiosity in natural sciences).

  2. "All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language." What does this ...

    So for example if a Jordanian man said that he has bought a new Egyptian man to the house, he would for sure mean that he has bought new worker in the house or gardener, but a person from outside Jordan would understand it as bringing a person from Egypt to the house.

  1. Discuss the Role of Language and Reason in History

    As mentioned earlier, each individual has a different view on any given incident. Although this could be due to many reasons history plays a very significant role in this. Each person could have a different perspective on a given event because of their past experiences when they were put in a similar situation.

  2. Are reason and emotion equal in justifying moral decisions?

    to do and his emotions will not disturb him but reason might tell him that it is wrong to steal because it harms someone else, thus benefiting the society. However his reason will not stop him from stealing because he is not personally affected or disturbed by his conscience but

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work