• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

Extracts from this document...


Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions? Decisions have always been tough issues to tackle. Deciding what one wants to order from a menu, what kind of candy to choose, whose heart to break and whether or not war is wrong are all complex decisions in their own right. However, this essay focuses upon the latter decisions - moral decisions. How does one know whether reason or emotion is the compass from which to follow to make the right decisions? To examine this, an analysis of the role of reason and emotion is necessary. However, the issue often arises as to what, even with reason and emotion, is a right decision composed of. Kant and Hume have independent views on the role of emotion and reason in making moral decisions and their opinions can, and are, extrapolated into science, politics and eventually into our own human perceptions. Instead of intertwining the two, the study of ethics has isolated reason from emotion which is ironic as both are necessary in making a solid moral decision. Reason has typically been interchangeable with logic in moral decisions. ...read more.


Meaning that regardless of western ideals of pure logic, emotion is necessary and unavoidable in dealing with human situations such as moral decisions.oweverH What constitutes a moral decision itself is ambiguous, let alone the role of anything in making them. Moral decisions themselves seem synonymous with conflicts of ethics. In ethics of science moral dilemmas arise when discussing psychological research and testing involving human beings. The main issues arise as to what is "right" and what is "wrong" for the person being tested. When I conducted a mini-experiment to test factors affecting human's fear of the dark I ran into issues such as this. Being able to scare my subjects without subjecting them to intense emotional discomfort is a fine line to trod upon. It seemed wrong to conduct an experiment which would significantly hinder my subjects, however this experiment seemed "right" for the acquisition of knowledge and getting a good grade in psychology. Many of the greatest psychological experiments such as Zimbardo's and Milgram's, would be shot down immediately by the ethics counsel. However, these experiments themselves have significantly changed and improved the field of sociology and psychology. ...read more.


This unyielding conclusion thus makes "Thou shalt not kill" a self-evident truth- an axiom of logic and reasoning. Human perception of the effects of death and our own fear of death make for a strong emotional response to death. To come to either conclusion (killing is right vs. killing is wrong in war) requires vast amounts of emotional responses and reasoning. Both are necessary to come to the "right" conclusion for oneself. Reason and emotion are both equally important in making moral decisions. The determination of what is "right" and what is "wrong", though ever-changing, are a result of a complex and sophisticated balance of logic and innate reactions. Although the nature of the decision itself is vague and ambiguous , reason and emotion provide the basis of the argument as to the decision itself and its effects. The balance between both is what makes humans - human. Every individual carries their own personal baggage into their decision making process but ultimately it is reason and emotion which link us all together in the decision making process. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions? Ania Gaboune 000953 023 May 2008 Word Count: 1,466 1 Kant, Immanuel "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals" 1785 2 Hume, David "A Treatise of Human Nature" (1739-1740) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Free essay

    Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    It is important to determine the ways of knowing because we respond to situations by what we know. Our knowledge and understanding needs to be justified, for example, George can say that he wants to see a particular film; he would need to have a good reason in order for him to know.

  2. Knowledge Vs Opinion Vs Propaganda

    By taking this action the person is applying their opinion in support for the knowledge give, resulting in ridicule or hostility from the opposing religious side. In comparison to this, the opinion based off religious propaganda would result in

  1. Language relation to Emotion

    he would say that it is blue due to his/her own limitation in language from the chinese culture. The accuracy in defining the true meaning will be off based on the one's language limitation.

  2. are reason and emotion equally necessary in the justifying a moral decision

    Without emotion the arts and music would never have flourished. The world would not be what it is today without emotion. A woman walking down the road sees a poor child barely a few years old begging for money. She is touched by the pitiable sight of this child as

  1. Although pragmatism has its values for society as a whole, emotion is necessary for ...

    From the latter viewpoint, equality is futile as progress is unattainable. Nevertheless, finding a rational basis for equality is not necessarily nonexistent, but rather open to interpretation. Feelings unequivocally have a "rational" basis. The distortion lies in the fact that the rationale is influenced by emotion.

  2. Discuss the view that we cannot justify absolutist moral rules in a multi cultural ...

    Moral relativism does not believe that there are any forms of intrinsically wrong actions out there, actions, which many societies would want to be condemned. Here I do not agree with the relativist view and would rather support absolutism, because I think that humans possess some sort of natural intuition that ?justifies? our intrinsic judgements concerning some actions (rape).

  1. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    or choosing a strong team optimizing our chances of victory. I thought it through, and my emotional need to win clouded my vision, then I went through a rational process and therefore went with choosing a strong team. The result of the choice derived through reason was a well deserved

  2. Are reason and emotion equal in justifying moral decisions?

    For example, a Christian might question the reason why fornication is wrong and find no sensible justification. Reason would tell him that it is not wrong but his intuition would tell him it?s wrong and the Christian would trust his instinct because trust itself is an emotion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work