• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are some ways of knowing more likely to lead to the truth?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are some ways of knowing more likely to lead to the truth? Discovering the truth may proceed in different ways. Depending on the circumstances or the aim of "research", one of the four ways of knowing may be used: emotion, perception, reason or language. Usually, they may be also used together, as far as some of them, at least in my opinion, are very related. Discussing the "efficiency" of WOK in leading to the truth, I think none of them is better or worse. ...read more.

Middle

However, thinking of the perception more deeply, it is not that objective as it seems to be. The process of becoming aware of the reality is often selective- people see what they what to see; also all the observations and then conclusions are interpreted, basing on one's experiences. This make the perception as WOK quite difficult to lead to any general, public truth. Focusing on the second aspect, emotion, I find this way of knowing very related to the previously mentioned. Perceiving of the external world raise emotions, even the smallest, shape thoughts, influence behavior. ...read more.

Conclusion

Eventually, the language that play an important role in knowing. Through the symbols, different meanings, words we perceive most of the reality. I would say it's a kind of tool used in every sphere of human's life, including of course the three rest of ways of knowing. After short analysis of the four ways of knowing, I came up with the conclusion that actually all of them are integral parts of the gaining knowledge process. Therefore, answering the topic question, I think that people are the most likely to find the truth using all the WOK. Separately, they may focus on different aspects, parts of any truth, but together they may create a coherent idea, that develops as an objective, mutual truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Which is the most reliable WOK?

    Languages reflect the cultures and thoughts and therefore may not be able to convey the same thought in different dialects.

  2. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    Nothing can shake the solidity of this reasoning. So short, so clear, so decisive...".Basically it is now due to those questions that David Hume calls the problem of evil "the rock of atheism". We often use the word 'evil' to describe something that is morally wrong in our eyes, just as for example we describe the actions of

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    is somewhat true, but not precise enough, whereas natural sciences have one correct answer and no other. In general, I am trying to prove that emotions can be explained in so many ways, that it is hard to get one exact answer.

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    The individual sees the light rays from the sun reflecting off the sand and the heat and interprets them as something that they're not. Also due to the stress the mind is under in the environment the individual wants to see water and an oasis so badly that the individual

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely to lead to truth than others?

    Now having discussed the truth in science, what ways of knowing are more likely than other to lead to the truth in science? Since scientific truth is largely determined by proof from experiments and not from observations, claims or predictions, reasoning would be more likely to lead to truth than the other three ways of knowing.

  2. For it is in the long run that, somehow, Truth may Survive-through the Decay ...

    Also, Lukacs uses the word 'survive'. He makes it seem that truth is being threatened by something, which in this case may be unawareness itself. The word 'somehow' implies that he is expressing uncertainty or hesitation about its survival and thus depends on the 'decay' of untruth.

  1. Are some Ways of Knowing more likely than other to lead to Truth?

    In chemistry experiment, even hearing, smell and sight are regularly used to distinguish different element's properties and their reaction with other substance. Similarly in physics, observation is crucial to find the pattern in the experiment. The use of perception is even integrated in the Indo-European culture.

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    This renowned philosopher basically determined that if a human being is in a position to think, then he/she could be certain of his/her own existence. However, thought can only develop as far as language allows it. Consider a thought experiment in which a newborn baby is kept in a completely

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work