• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are some ways of knowing more likely to lead to truth than others?

Extracts from this document...


Truth and the Ways of Knowing Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth? Yes, I believe the statement to be true. In different areas of knowing come different truths within each area. Truth is defined as 'a proven or verified statement'1, something that corresponds with reality and logic. But every human defines truth in his or her own way (e.g. the truth in god is a common example). However, truth does not vary from human to human but from areas as well. The truth in economics may not be the same as truth within art area or the truth in science may not be the same in religion. Because there are distinct truths in different areas of knowing there are therefore some ways of knowing that may lead to the truth within an area of knowledge more accurately than the others. Instead of just concentrating on the four ways of knowing language, perception, emotion and reason, I will also look at four areas of knowledge, science, art, mathematics and history. As I had discussed above, the truth in the areas of knowledge differ from one another. The truth in science isn't as simple as most would think. The truth in science can be shown through an analogy of a beach. The beach itself is all of the areas of knowledge. ...read more.


However, both the perception and the language of that statement are scientifically false. The language infers that the daily event suggests the sun is the object that moves (and that is not true). Therefore not only is perception inaccurate for scientific truth but language as well. The truth as well as the accurate way of knowing in art is almost the complete opposite to science. The truth in art is the true meaning and emotion of the piece/composition that comes from the mind/eye of the creator (for he/she is the only one who understands the true meaning of the creation). The truth in art is the complete opposite to science. Science is objective and emotion free while art is subjective and full of emotion. The truth in art isn't like a truth you would receive in a scientific experiment; the truth in art is not literal but instead containing an inner layer of truth. Therefore, since the truth in art is the opposite of the truth in science, doesn't that mean that the accurate way of knowing the truth would be the opposite as well? The use of perception and language in art is the proper way of knowing the truth as opposed to using reasoning. This is because in perception and language the audience/viewer is interpreting the work of art (this includes other forms e.g. ...read more.


Instead of being spoken like a language, mathematics is expressed. Through the proper understanding of the language, any person can utilize the patterns, numbers etc. and therefore apply the proper reasoning (whether than be inductive or deductive reasoning). Emotion as well as perception do not play a large role in finding the truth within mathematics because they involved the human senses which in terms of the truth, do not apply. This is because the truth in mathematics is dependent on numbers and calculations, not through feelings or senses. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth? Yes, some are. With different areas of knowledge come different truths that are distinct and vary from other areas. With distinct truths come easier ways of leading to truth that others. It is easier to use reason as a way of knowing than it is for perception, emotion or language to lead to the truth in science. The truth in the arts is easily lead to through the use of perception, language as well as emotion compared to the use of reason (complete opposite of the truth in science). The truth in mathematics can be accurately found through a mixture of science and the arts - which in this case is reason and language while emotion and perception are not reliable due to the human senses. Overall, depending on the area of knowing and the form of truth ultimately reflects different accurate ways of knowing that lead to truth. 1 Definition of truth according to 'The Collins English Dictionary' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK - Can we rely on perception to lead us to the truth

    How strong the evidence is, is what the 'Ways of Knowing' influence. Some statements can have full certainty, such as 2+2=4 or that 'I am sitting on a chair'. But sometimes strong evidence is required to back up the truth, as it cannot be easily argued against.

  2. What is Gentleman? What are the characteristics of the Gentleman? Is it possible to ...

    or to be "the Gentleman". Nevertheless Gentleman and Ideal Person have differences. According to Plato, Ideal Person is the person who serves for his State and considers what justice is. Moreover he must not think neither physical nor spiritual well-being, he should be patriot.

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    If my ethical set of rules was completely objective, I would be against the very notion of murder and would allow myself to be killed. However, many people would view that as an unethical choice because I allowed myself (an innocent person)

  2. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    Throughout the rooms of the Canadian art section, the colours seemed to get bolder and more vibrant. In the first few rooms, the colours were dark and each colour was standing out. There was good contrast between the dark and the brighter colours.

  1. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    Or is it that God does not care about his creation? Or maybe he is not omniscient4 (he simply doesn't know we are suffering). For example David Hume an 18th century atheist questioned "Why is there any misery in the world?

  2. Compare and contrast knowing a friend to knowing how to swim,knowing a scientific theory ...

    Empathy is the key to understanding another person. It is not possible to 'know' everything that is going on in a friends head, even if you know them well. Therefore we cannot know, we can only empathize; we can 'imagine' what it is like to be them.

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    Even though language is established between at least two individuals, its ambiguous nature could easily mislead the meaning derived from the receiver. Consider an example in which another peer characterized my actions as ?good?. On a first moment, I thought that what he meant was to positively describe my actions.

  2. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    8. The piece of art work that leaves me puzzled is called Lever by Carl Andre and was created in 1966. This piece of art is made up of only 137 firebricks. 1. I liked the piece due to its strange yet simple style.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work