• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that 'we value art because it expresses the feelings of the artist'. (30)

Extracts from this document...


Assess the claim that 'we value art because it expresses the feelings of the artist'. (30) The theory that we value art because it expresses the feelings of the artist is one held by those who believe in what is called 'emotivism' - art is valued because of its emotional impact (on the audience), whether that comes from our own personal reaction, the artwork acting as a 'container' for the artists emotion (implying that the emotion we feel is the same as the artists upon creation) or the artwork 'capturing' the emotion by sharing what it is like to feel it (like a metaphor). According to this theory, a 'good' artist is in touch with their emotions and can channel them [into artwork]. We feel our emotion when we experience artwork, and good artworks are those which give us an effective feeling. These emotions are the same as emotions that we may feel elsewhere in life, but art somehow uses them in a different way. Aristotle raises the idea of catharsis, which is the idea that we (us personally and the artist) ...read more.


He used Jung and Freud's ideas of the subconscious in order to portray pure emotion, not one particular emotion but just emotion as a whole. It does not portray any objects, as he did whatever he felt like at the time, with him suggesting it was his subconscious emotion that created said work of art. However, this theory is questionable. Is it really the self expression of the artist we value? It can be difficult to create a link between the artists' emotions and ours. How can we be sure that we are experiencing the same emotion as the artist initially felt? Even if we both feel sad, is it the same sadness? Wimsatt and Beardsley's The Intention Fallacy argues that we should never even take the intentions of the artist into account when we judge an artwork; all that matters is our own response. They stated that "the design or intention of the author is neither available nor desirable as a standard for judging the success of a literary work of art". This means that we can not be sure we are experiencing the same emotion as the artist initially felt, and even if we could it is not desirable anyway. ...read more.


Emotivism seems to provide a good and strong theory as to why we value art - simply because it allows us to feel and express emotion, and that 'good' art is art that expresses an emotion and moves us in a particular way. It seems a credible theory with regard to the real world, it makes sense that we would enjoy and appreciate a piece of artwork because it gives us a particular feeling, whether that be happy or sad - however like all theories it has its weaknesses, it may not be the artist's self-expression we value, our responses to the artwork may also not be the focus of our appreciation either, as it may remind us of a particular event or someone. Not all art is necessarily emotional like abstract minimalistic art, and possibly most importantly, emotion is essentially subjective so it is not an effective base for judging whether artwork is 'good' or 'bad' because everybody will feel differently dependent on their particular emotions; emotivism may provide useful in explaining why different people value pieces of art but not with regard to society as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    The piece of art, along with the inner significance it holds was most probably intended to be worthy of having the majority of the public's response as similar as possible. One person who observes any piece of work, such as the spider, should have achieved a similar range of emotional depth as another would.

  2. TOK Journals

    Inductive Logic- Without knowing it, we all use induction all the time. An example of inductive reasoning is "because I have always enjoyed playing tennis, I assume that if I play again today, I will again enjoy it." Or "day has always followed night in my experience, so I assume that it will continue to do so."

  1. Tok Work

    with the concept of scientific investigation in the area of knowledge pertaining to the natural sciences as a truly rational activity. Nevertheless, it is an approach adopted by many research scientists. A knowledge claim imagined to be based on emotion; intuition and vested interests may sometimes influence the course of science as much as logic and experimentation.

  2. How convincing is the claim that we value art because it is an act ...

    There are many objections to the view that we value art because it successfully conveys and communicates emotions felt by the artist. For example, Collingwood, held the view that an artist may not always know the emotions they are expressing at the time of creation.

  1. Tok Art Assignment: My reactions on visiting the Art Gallery

    This made the spider seem less foreign and more appealing to me. 1. Having different possible responses to this piece can be a weakness. The many different responses can distract the viewer from the main response that the artist wants them to experience.

  2. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers?. What the Chinese government is doing seizes away the liberty of citizens. Google also accuses China of interfering with their Gmail email system, making it

  1. TOK Speech on Art


  2. Can it be plausibly argued that art is brought into being only in the ...

    Another example that validates the statement made previously can be made by taking into examination a northern Italian man who lived in the early 1800s. He was a very peculiar man who dedicated his whole life to the intellectual aspect of it, reading and learning possibly as much as his human mind could handle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work