• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Autobiography of the Knower. What kinds of knowledge have you taken as true? What have you doubted?

Extracts from this document...


Nicholas Zaza Theory Of Knowledge February 12, 2011 Ms. McDougall Question: What kinds of knowledge have you taken as true? What have you doubted? As the knower, there is a type of knowledge that I can actually accept to be true; retrospectively, there are many types of knowledge that I can't accept to be true. This type of question is really poignant due to the way certain people just find it easier to just submit their opinions submissively, rather than fighting for what they believe to the death. Without doubting something, we are unaware of the other side of the story; by just accepting something we aren't truly certain is true, we are inherently making our world languish and remain at a standstill. I accept knowledge by acquaintance to be true. ...read more.


I doubt knowledge by description because it is knowledge based on description of experience. We can't accept the validity of that person's recalling of an event because it isn't necessarily exactly what happened; also, if we experience something firsthand, we are more inclined to remembering it because of its emotional attachment to ourselves. We don't know what actually happened, and if the source is reputable enough to trust. An element of sabotage is introduced in this knowledge because someone can say something to you to get a leg-up. There also might be something "lost in translation" when someone is telling something to me and because of this I can't accept it. An English saying might not translate into another language the same way and can be taken the wrong way; each language has idioms and don't translate the same way. ...read more.


As humans, we are infallible; henceforth knowledge by authority is flawed. A doctor can misdiagnose a patient as having strep throat, when in reality the patient has throat cancer. This misdiagnosis can lead do the death of people. People seem to justify that something must be true because someone smarter or someone in a highly ranked political position or a doctor says something to be true. Knowledge is the crossing of beliefs and truths; as the knower, it is I who can say since something is proven to be true, it must be true, but if I don't believe it to be true, it is not knowledge. Knowledge is taking a proposition and justifying it to be true. As knowers in the world, we should all question things to be true because of the positive effect it has on our world. Word count: 628 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Autobiography: Me as a Knower

    The thing that changed me the most were the questions that was given to me on the second week. These questions like "How did you know your best friend" or "How do you know you are in danger" really couldn't had been answered by knowledge from experts or though verification.

  2. Knower's profile. My history and experiences are responsible for the knowledge-seeking-individual I am ...

    My dad, the scientist, completed 15 years of education in America with the highest degree and receiving a Ph.D. in toxicology. For the sake of education, he defeated all odds, be it everything from social status and parental expectations for the sake of education.

  1. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    Repetition comes into play in history in the gathering and analyzing stage of a historian's work where they attempt to get closer to the truth. Through the analysis of a multitude of sources, historians are able to establish truths regarding a historical event.

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    Art, by function, operates with variables that are subject to change. The arts communicate the idea of creator indirectly from person to person- it is this identification that makes it artistic - through perception. It is through this identification and personal association of the subject (the viewer)

  1. The Law of the Universe: Entropy

    For arguments sake, let us propose a classification. First there is logic, then there is mathmatics, then physics, chemisty, biology, psychology and finally sociology. Firstly we have the most pure description of nature, that is logic. We can assume this as it describes the very essence of reality.

  2. "What I tell you three times is true" (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula- or ...

    Yet there is no proof for them. Therefore, how do we, as the "knowers," decide which interpretation to believe is the truth? Do we believe a view is "true" because we heard it so many times? In order to test the formula, let's move directly into the history classroom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work