• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By taking ideas from philosophers before him such as Locke and Berkeley, Hume is able to argue how our ideas and beliefs come from past experiences rather than from reason.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding", is a book where Humes attempts to convince the audience through a series of arguments the theory of knowledge. In Part 1-3 of the book, Humes explains the two forms of philosophical thinking and the difference between impressions and ideas. By taking ideas from philosophers before him such as Locke and Berkeley, Humes is able to argue how our ideas and beliefs come from past experiences rather than from reason. In Part 2, Humes explains that most of our ideas and beliefs stem from past experiences not in reason. He believes that if we try to support our ideas through reason, we will never find the answer. ...read more.

Middle

All in all, Humes argues that through nature, one is able to form ideas and beliefs. Like many of the great philosophers before him, Humes did not come up with his arguments all by himself. Although he may have taken some arguments from John Locke and George Berkeley, I respect that Humes not only elaborated on these ideas but also solved some flawed reasoning proposed by the previous philosophers. Both Berkeley and Humes believed that our words stemmed from previous ideas and that people are not talking logically if there are no ideas behind their words. But the main difference that I found between these two philosophers was that Berkeley believed that God has a role in imbuing these ideas into people's minds. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is the classic argument of nature vs. nurture. Both Humes and Locke believed that the mind was a blank slate and that all the knowledge of the world around them was based on what the person could gain from their sensory experience. Humes makes a good argument supporting this idea and I think this is one of the main reasons people accept his view that ideas come from prior knowledge and the sensory experience. Still considered to be one of the influential philosophers of his time, Humes' logic is still used in the world today. As one continues to read through the book, one will notice that Humes continues to build upon his ideas. Because Humes arguments and views are logical and understandable, I believe this is why he made new strides during the Enlightenment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Emotion Vs Reason

    In elaboration to this, reasoning then continues to prove that this statement is in fact true, where the equation is reversed in the manner of (9 � 3 = 3). In this process of reasoning the nature of emotion does not come forward, however might have taken place in the estimation or guesswork of mathematics.

  2. TOK: Religious beliefs

    One has to realize that the core tenet of religion requiring the belief in an afterlife, in which no-one has a proof of even being remotely true, is maybe comforting for us, but certainly not for the many others whose life is at the mercy of afterlife believing hands.

  1. Tok Chap 1-3

    * You can sometimes require knowledge simply by reflecting on the information you already have at your disposal rather than by looking for more information. Second-Hand Knowledge * We are able to know a great deal more about the world than if we had to rely on our resources because we can share our experiences through language.

  2. Where does knowledge come from?

    However, when one thinks about this, one might conclude that this young historian might be just as capable as and maybe even more so than a true witness to the event. The writer has gotten all of his knowledge on the subject through research and interaction with actual people who bear witness to the Civil Rights era.

  1. Some people say that religious beliefs can be neither justified nor refuted by reason. ...

    are false and many new theorems can be proven'.3 This gives us a reason to think that mathematical claims strongly rely on the mathematician's belief that these rules and theorems are obviously the only correct ones. So faith can be 'a legitimate basis for knowledge claims' both in religion and in other areas of knowledge.

  2. What do you understand by George Orwells comment that Who controls the past controls ...

    Literally, I would be correct to say that the Europeans stole every from the Indian - land, culture, and peace - as they were equiped with weapons and modern technolgy that could kill thousand. Hence the new comers were more powerful and stronger side than the Native Indian.

  1. How do beliefs about the world...

    King Ferdinand II thought that this mission would be worth financing simply because he was thinking of the possible monetary gain. This idea that finances may be an aid or a disadvantage to the pursuit of knowledge depends solely on the viewpoint of the pursuer is still a fact today.

  2. David Hume God

    However, David Hume argues that it is impossible to deduce that causes can be determined by the effects and miracles are the only type of evidence that can possible support theistic claims. Hume discusses the belief that a miracle cannot be a common event nor is a negative event.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work