• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Coherence Essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alex Kluivert Theory of Knowledge 8 December 2008 Coherence v Correspondence The United States is known for its claims of freedom and justice, but who is to say what these claims even mean. It is obvious that the very citizens that claim freedom have no idea what these claims mean. How is it that if we say we know what freedom and justice is, we have our disagreements politically? A few months ago if there was a physical being of justice and freedom, the U.S. would have voted almost unanimously for one single candidate there would be no questions of justice and individual freedoms. Another example is The Articles of Confederation, the United States' first attempt at organized government. It failed miserably. Much of this failure can be attributed to the fact that any significant change or addition made to the original document needed a unanimous approval. The states almost never agreed on anything. Anyone who is even halfway familiar with politics today will laugh at the idea of one hundred percent approval. Why is this? Why do we disagree, sometimes so far as to render compromises impossible, on so many things? Our disagreements all come from different perspectives on what is true, what is good, and what is beautiful. ...read more.

Middle

And when these authorities clash who's to say which is correct. What the post modernist would argue is, he who has the most power has the most authority. In other words, if you don't believe what I believe I'll send in my army until you do. This seems very childish. When I was younger my and my mom would give my sister and I two pieces of cake, my sister would always take the larger one. When I would claim that's not fair she would say "I'm bigger so try to stop me". Expertise, although possibly more reliable than authority, comes from repeated experience, already discussed as individual and subjective. Also, none of these truth tests can be considered universal if Hume is right and we cannot directly perceive reality. Therefore another truth theory must be offered up: coherence. Coherence, like correspondence, has two branches: subjectivism and relativism. Subjectivism says that truth comes completely from within one's individual virtuous circle. Relativism states that truth comes from within the virtuous circles of one's culture. The three tests in coherence all rely on proper examination of one's virtuous circle, specifically the consistency of a claim with claims already considered true, covalence while looking for contradictions between claims, and logical entailment. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Correspondentist would argue that beauty is in the object itself. But if this were true would it not be true that all people would find the Mona Lisa beautiful. If Kant is to be believed people should come to the same conclusion of objects that are beautiful if there is beauty within that of the object itself. But there are many examples of exceptions to these rules. Tests have concluded that people find a healthy looking person more attractive simply for reproductive purposes, like that of any animal species on the planet. But there are people that believe the only attractive people are people missing limbs. If these people truly are the only attractive people why it that models and actors is aren't all amputees. Of course, coherence is not completely without fault. The subdivisions do not always work, and individuals do not always follow the morals of their societies. From this, we get the court system. Some further questions might arise from this, and there are kinks in this hierarchical system, especially when it comes to the less than perfect formation of government. Still, theoretically, coherence is more probable a response, under the arguments of Kant and Hume, than correspondence with its all-important "universal" truth can be. Whether such a theory can be practically applied is something that most people including me are still working on. ?? ?? ?? ?? Alex Welsch 7 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Perception of Beauty

    Cultures: Perception of beauty may change according to your culture or the environment around you. There is no 'one way' of describing beauty. There is an infinite description of beauty, and the way how different cultures perceive beauty shows this fact.

  2. I Know that the Sun Will Rise Tomorrow Morning

    This is exactly why the North and South Poles are always blanketed over a think layer of ice, for it doesn't get exposed to the sun's powerful rays as much as other places do on the face of the Earth (in fact they don't get exposed to sunlight for 6

  1. Moral Laws

    keeps thinking should he do this or not , he knows if he did it he will gain happiness but in the same time his would have betrayed his morals , for example a Muslim might find it hard to sleep with a woman that is not rightfully and religiously

  2. Different cultures have different truths.

    1+1 could equal 2 or 3 or 487, depending on what people believe. Deep plowing could cause plants to grow taller as people believed in china during the great leap forward, heavier bodies might actually fall faster than lighter ones, and bloodletting might actually cure disease.

  1. TOK - French Headscarf Ban - This law has not only affected faiths within ...

    Thus, I will first look into how this ban has been perceived positively, and then how it has been perceived negatively. Solely based on perception, other nations have viewed this ban in various ways; this is due to the selectivity of perception, and confirmation bias.

  2. The Law of the Universe: Entropy

    Last but not least, or at any rate not least if you value relativism (the studies of psychology and sociology are particularly criticised for not having an empirical basis and thus not properly describing reality and thus not describing absolute truths but truths that are only relative to the study of life as we know it)

  1. Belief System or not?

    certain key elements to them; readings from the written teachings of God and Christ, belief in a Holy Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Ghost), lyrical praise, prayer and often Communion. Depending on the denomination, Christian worship is led by a priest, reverend, minister or other, sometimes numerous, leaders, who serve

  2. Reliability of Sigmund Freud's claims

    That contradicts Freud's idea. Therefore I neither disagree nor agree with his ideas since they can't be logically justified, but on the other hand gain support from the many instances where they seem to be true. "Prove" is a big word, and it is often misused.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work