• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Coherence Essay

Extracts from this document...


Alex Kluivert Theory of Knowledge 8 December 2008 Coherence v Correspondence The United States is known for its claims of freedom and justice, but who is to say what these claims even mean. It is obvious that the very citizens that claim freedom have no idea what these claims mean. How is it that if we say we know what freedom and justice is, we have our disagreements politically? A few months ago if there was a physical being of justice and freedom, the U.S. would have voted almost unanimously for one single candidate there would be no questions of justice and individual freedoms. Another example is The Articles of Confederation, the United States' first attempt at organized government. It failed miserably. Much of this failure can be attributed to the fact that any significant change or addition made to the original document needed a unanimous approval. The states almost never agreed on anything. Anyone who is even halfway familiar with politics today will laugh at the idea of one hundred percent approval. Why is this? Why do we disagree, sometimes so far as to render compromises impossible, on so many things? Our disagreements all come from different perspectives on what is true, what is good, and what is beautiful. ...read more.


And when these authorities clash who's to say which is correct. What the post modernist would argue is, he who has the most power has the most authority. In other words, if you don't believe what I believe I'll send in my army until you do. This seems very childish. When I was younger my and my mom would give my sister and I two pieces of cake, my sister would always take the larger one. When I would claim that's not fair she would say "I'm bigger so try to stop me". Expertise, although possibly more reliable than authority, comes from repeated experience, already discussed as individual and subjective. Also, none of these truth tests can be considered universal if Hume is right and we cannot directly perceive reality. Therefore another truth theory must be offered up: coherence. Coherence, like correspondence, has two branches: subjectivism and relativism. Subjectivism says that truth comes completely from within one's individual virtuous circle. Relativism states that truth comes from within the virtuous circles of one's culture. The three tests in coherence all rely on proper examination of one's virtuous circle, specifically the consistency of a claim with claims already considered true, covalence while looking for contradictions between claims, and logical entailment. ...read more.


The Correspondentist would argue that beauty is in the object itself. But if this were true would it not be true that all people would find the Mona Lisa beautiful. If Kant is to be believed people should come to the same conclusion of objects that are beautiful if there is beauty within that of the object itself. But there are many examples of exceptions to these rules. Tests have concluded that people find a healthy looking person more attractive simply for reproductive purposes, like that of any animal species on the planet. But there are people that believe the only attractive people are people missing limbs. If these people truly are the only attractive people why it that models and actors is aren't all amputees. Of course, coherence is not completely without fault. The subdivisions do not always work, and individuals do not always follow the morals of their societies. From this, we get the court system. Some further questions might arise from this, and there are kinks in this hierarchical system, especially when it comes to the less than perfect formation of government. Still, theoretically, coherence is more probable a response, under the arguments of Kant and Hume, than correspondence with its all-important "universal" truth can be. Whether such a theory can be practically applied is something that most people including me are still working on. ?? ?? ?? ?? Alex Welsch 7 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK - Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

    unrealistic because those people do not look like ordinary people that you would see on a daily basis. The word "beauty" is a generic and common word so therefore too abstract and general to describe something.

  2. Ethics and Underage Drinking

    But this does not always make it unjust. There certainly are many people under the age of 21 who could probably drink safely, and there are those that argue that as we learn from our mistakes, we should have these mistakes happen earlier.

  1. TOK essay question 8.

    to this and proof it so. Potentially, without relying on their culture and experience, they have objective knowledge. As well as the prime number theory, the number which have no factor except itself and one1, which we didn't use much in our life time or even in Math class.

  2. I Know that the Sun Will Rise Tomorrow Morning

    Perhaps my personal experience can be held responsible, or my indefinite ability to rationalize and subconsciously conduct legitimate reasoning. The puzzling question still remains, however, unanswered. One of the most amazing gifts "given" to us human beings was the ability to see.

  1. TOK - French Headscarf Ban - This law has not only affected faiths within ...

    But how does this relate to our Real World Issue? Well, how people perceive things contributes to their overall understanding of the issue. In fact, there is a school of thought, empiricism, which believes that all knowledge is ultimately based on perceptual experience.

  2. Moral Laws

    keeps thinking should he do this or not , he knows if he did it he will gain happiness but in the same time his would have betrayed his morals , for example a Muslim might find it hard to sleep with a woman that is not rightfully and religiously

  1. The Legitimacy of the State. From where does the state derive its authority?

    There is a distinction between authority and power. The word ?power? here refers to brute force; one party calls the shots and the weaker party has no say in the matter. The word ?authority?, by contrast, has a more bilateral sense; there is a degree of mutual recognition between ruler and ruled, and some acceptance on the part of the latter.

  2. This essay will attempt to determine whether a point or argument made to an ...

    Further to the importance and various nuances of repetition in the context of truth and belief another aspect needs a mention: the credibility or authoritative nature of the person conveying the actual message. We are going to proceed with an argument that the higher the social standing and credibility of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work