• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast any two different ways of knowing cats. Is it possible to give any preferential status to one particular way?

Extracts from this document...


Ahana Nanavati TOK 11c October 7, 2003 Compare and contrast any two different ways of knowing cats. Is it possible to give any preferential status to one particular way? Knowledge by definition is facts, feelings or experiences known by a person or a group of people1. It is awareness, consciousness, or familiarity gained by experience or learning. It is erudition learning. There are various ways of knowing. The categorized ways of knowing include emotion, reason, language and perception. Emotion is derived from the body, within the heart, which gives human beings the capacity to respond to knowledge imaginatively. Reason and logic are derived from empirical evidence. Language is the tool with which humans communicate knowledge. It is also a tool of thought. ...read more.


The relationships cats have with the environment around them can be explored by the ecological part of scientific inquiry. The nourishment necessary for a cat's development is also a way of knowing cats, which can only be reasoned through this way of knowing. Basically, the sciences help understand cats as a species, their lives, structure, growth, function, and origin. On the other hand, personal experience, also a very significant way of knowing, has a totally different approach to knowing cats. The knowledge gained by personal experience is derived from a very creative process in a person's body or heart rather than brain. This process is one that creates emotional attachment between the person and the cat. Personal experience also causes an individual to perceive the cat and transform any data noticed into a knowledge claim. ...read more.


For example, a cat's behavior and response to their surroundings can be understood through both. But while scientific enquiry is knowledge strongly based on experiments and science, personal experience is knowledge gained through true interaction with the animal. Knowledge claims based on scientific inquiry are derived from the left-brain, as it is to do with reason and logic. Whereas claims based on personal experience are derived from the right brain, as it is to do with emotion and feelings. It's a contrast between the minds vs. body. Personal experience also allows the person to be more specific about their knowledge claims as they can be made according to a certain cat, rather than a generalized knowledge claim based on scientific inquiry, which covers most cats. They both together offer a strong knowing of cats, thus preferential status cannot be given to any one particular way. 1 http://www.wordreference.com ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is Gentleman? What are the characteristics of the Gentleman? Is it possible to ...

    that "Was Adam Smith the Gentleman?". Obviously, answer is "yes". If we ask this question for someone who is from other society (suppose sportsmen). Certainly, answer is "Who is it?". I mean, it is possible to be the Gentleman in narrow society. Nevertheless it is impossible to be the Gentleman for the whole society which consists of narrow societies.

  2. Capital Punishment and why it should be abolished, with particular regard to the Human ...

    Capital punishment can be applied by the following ways, namely; beheading, electrocution, injection and gun fire. These methods represent painful ways to kill an individual. Not only physically, but the convicted would feel so much emotional stress leading to their death and in thinking of their family.

  1. Compare and contrast knowing a friend to knowing how to swim,knowing a scientific theory ...

    When I look at what happened to me, I have been surprised by what I thought I knew: I nearly drowned when kayaking; the kayak capsized and I got stuck under the current, pinned against the cliff. Before that day, I knew that I could swim.

  2. Oversimplication in the Ways of Knowing

    is the capital of the United States. Therefore, perception not only provides one with interpretations of knowledge, but also provides facts, and even interpretations that lead to facts. In emotion, one gains knowledge through one's mental and spiritual feelings based on experience. Once again, knowledge through emotion is not limited to only interpretations.

  1. Reliability of Sigmund Freud's claims

    More and more people also claim to be depressed in these days, therefore a tool such as psychology that can alleviate such feelings are very useful. Since Psychology is in great use today, and Sigmund Freud to a large extent is the man behind it, he deserves a position in the hall of fame of influential thinkers.

  2. Evaluating Scientific Method as a Way of Knowing

    hypothesis for the experiment and designing experiments can be difficult as the only method is using animals which would bring in ethical issues. Furthermore, the number of experiments to be carried out will be several and the timeline for the experiments may spread out through generations which would be highly

  1. Is Feminism the right movement in attainment of a mutual status?

    India is a country with a huge disparity, socially and economically, we are currently the largest illiterate population in the world.

  2. Is it possible to justify the different ways of knowing?

    Personally, I believe that there is a hierarchy among the ways of knowledge, in which the criteria underlying the hierarchy is based on reliability and accuracy. Knowledge delivered though the ways of knowing must be firstly reliable, where it can be trusted and defined by its ability to remove any form of bias or uncertainty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work