• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast any two different ways of knowing cats. Is it possible to give any preferential status to one particular way?

Extracts from this document...


Ahana Nanavati TOK 11c October 7, 2003 Compare and contrast any two different ways of knowing cats. Is it possible to give any preferential status to one particular way? Knowledge by definition is facts, feelings or experiences known by a person or a group of people1. It is awareness, consciousness, or familiarity gained by experience or learning. It is erudition learning. There are various ways of knowing. The categorized ways of knowing include emotion, reason, language and perception. Emotion is derived from the body, within the heart, which gives human beings the capacity to respond to knowledge imaginatively. Reason and logic are derived from empirical evidence. Language is the tool with which humans communicate knowledge. It is also a tool of thought. ...read more.


The relationships cats have with the environment around them can be explored by the ecological part of scientific inquiry. The nourishment necessary for a cat's development is also a way of knowing cats, which can only be reasoned through this way of knowing. Basically, the sciences help understand cats as a species, their lives, structure, growth, function, and origin. On the other hand, personal experience, also a very significant way of knowing, has a totally different approach to knowing cats. The knowledge gained by personal experience is derived from a very creative process in a person's body or heart rather than brain. This process is one that creates emotional attachment between the person and the cat. Personal experience also causes an individual to perceive the cat and transform any data noticed into a knowledge claim. ...read more.


For example, a cat's behavior and response to their surroundings can be understood through both. But while scientific enquiry is knowledge strongly based on experiments and science, personal experience is knowledge gained through true interaction with the animal. Knowledge claims based on scientific inquiry are derived from the left-brain, as it is to do with reason and logic. Whereas claims based on personal experience are derived from the right brain, as it is to do with emotion and feelings. It's a contrast between the minds vs. body. Personal experience also allows the person to be more specific about their knowledge claims as they can be made according to a certain cat, rather than a generalized knowledge claim based on scientific inquiry, which covers most cats. They both together offer a strong knowing of cats, thus preferential status cannot be given to any one particular way. 1 http://www.wordreference.com ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Capital Punishment and why it should be abolished, with particular regard to the Human ...

    Lastly, capital punishment violates section 5 of the Universal Declaration of Rights as it brings the victim an inhumane punishment as it kills them and that treatment is not only inhumane but is also degrading due to the fact that the person and their family will be under constant attention.

  2. What is Gentleman? What are the characteristics of the Gentleman? Is it possible to ...

    work without salary. Then after inventing something, they become famous and the profit of scientists is in the form of salary and well-known reputation. In addition to, Confucius's Gentleman and Plato's Ideal Person have similarities and of course, dissimilarities. The Master said 'The gentleman is no vessel!'

  1. Compare and contrast the epistemological positions of the rationalists and empiricists

    the belief that there is an entity, I, which is doing all the doubting. For the mental process of doubting to exist, there must be one entity which is doing it. This, he claimed, will be the foundation of knowledge.

  2. Reliability of Sigmund Freud's claims

    G�del, for example, showed that mathematically a proof is never certain, and that leaves the other lower ranking sciences in the hierarchy in the same state. A large part of proving something is the given thing's ability to convince someone: to make someone believe.

  1. work based project

    Interviews The first interview I conducted was with *John who suffered from mania which is a 'severe condition characterised by extremely elevated mood, energy and unusual thought patterns' (Jamison, K. R, 1996). It is also often associated with bipolar disorder.

  2. Is Feminism the right movement in attainment of a mutual status?

    India is a country with a huge disparity, socially and economically, we are currently the largest illiterate population in the world.

  1. Evaluating Scientific Method as a Way of Knowing

    Since the outcome and effect of the product should be precise, the scientists need to have a solid hypothesis and carry out many experiments to arrive at the desired outcome.

  2. Is it possible to justify the different ways of knowing?

    Personally, I believe that there is a hierarchy among the ways of knowledge, in which the criteria underlying the hierarchy is based on reliability and accuracy. Knowledge delivered though the ways of knowing must be firstly reliable, where it can be trusted and defined by its ability to remove any form of bias or uncertainty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work