• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast knowing a friend to knowing how to swim,knowing a scientific theory and knowing a historical period.

Extracts from this document...


9. Compare and contrast knowing a friend to knowing how to swim, knowing a scientific theory and knowing a historical period. What conclusions about the nature of knowledge can you reach? I though I knew how to swim until I nearly drowned. I though I knew my friend until she attempted suicide. I thought I knew the speed of sound couldn't be broken on land until it was in the 1990's. I thought I knew WW2 took place in the 1800's until I took History class. When considering these questions, my initial reaction is how difficult it is to be certain in the world we live in. However, when considering this question further, it is possible to make some distinctions between knowing a friend, knowing how to swim, knowing a scientific theory and knowing a historical period. For me, knowing something implies having a certain mental apprehension which can be justified using evidence. All knowledge claims are different, and therefore the evidence will be of different nature for each one. I shall therefore show their differences using the four ways of knowing: Emotion, Perception, Language, and Reason, as well as my own experiences as a Tok student to help justify my answer. ...read more.


Communication through emotion and language also enables us to reflect on our emotions. Based on past events, you decide you want as a friend, and come to the conclusion of whether they are your friend or not and whether you know 'them'. I often wonder how I know I can trust my emotions; even when we think we know someone we can be surprised: If knowing a friend is knowing the way they think, you can only predict their actions to a certain extent. For example, I though I knew my friend very well until she attempted suicide; I knew she was a smart and fun person, but I didn't know she had trouble at home. Every person's brain allows change of mind, because with emotions, there is an element of spontaneity, and the concept that nothing is pre-determined allows room for change. The ways of knowing associated with knowing a scientific theory are perception, reason and language. I think knowing a scientific theory is seeing it repeatedly in action, without failing. Seeing out of my own eyes is proof. For example, I have never seen gravity 'not working'; therefore 'I know' Newton's law of gravity. At school, we did two experiments involving the breakdown of starch into glucose: one with an enzyme solution and one without it. ...read more.


Whereas knowing a friend is based on empathy and knowing how to swim is based on experience and training, they can both by associated with the aspect of 'natural instinct', as well as something you learn 'how to do'; learning 'how to' know a friend, 'how to' swim. Knowing a scientific theory and a historical period depends on the transmission of knowledge through language, despite its problems, and depending on 'fact' to lead us to the truth by 'knowing that'. Additionally swimming and science can be tested, unlike the others. Knowledge is constantly updated and upgraded, similarly to a computer. The new and better knowledge replaces the old knowledge, to get the closest to the truth as possible. But although these are different claims requiring different ways of knowing to justify them, they have all have one thing in common; their nature: they are based on premises that we accept in every day life as being 'true' and therefore deduct that based on these premises, they are equally true. We know something as far as we are willing to accept it into our world. Reference: Theory of Knowledge, by Nicholas Alchin, published in London, 2003. Regarding the World - A primer for Tok, by Tony Stuart, published in Kent, 2000. Lonely Planets, by David Grinspoon, published in New York, 2004 www.ibtok.com www.digitalbrain.com ?? ?? ?? ?? March 10, 2006 Claudia King ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Oversimplication in the Ways of Knowing

    The Way of perception also provides facts. One can say that Washington D.C. is the capital of the United States. He or she knows this statement through experience (he or she has been to Washington D.C. and has seen that it is, indeed, the capital of the United States)

  2. To what extent do you think reason is an objective, reliable way of knowing? ...

    Yesterday we had money, today we don't, but if you're well educated you will regain the money." Therefore when I am involved in a certain argument that has to do with 'Money being everything' I would usually disagree and say otherwise.

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    485 - 420 BCE). Written evidence is the fundamental feature of any historical explanation but still submitted to doubt as it is only one persons viewpoint on a matter. Even though, a scientific explanation requires a background of careful observation necessitating all five senses, technology and mathematics play a central role in the development of scientific ideas.

  2. Evaluate the ways in which emotions might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way ...

    of reality or has a misunderstanding over an event, like the wallet example above. VII Although the paragraph above states that some emotions are indeed rational, others are not. When experiencing strong emotions like fear, one can change beliefs to what fear tells one to fear, and one then uses irrational reasoning.

  1. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    The definition of the word "science" is: "Systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation."1 This definition shows us that the sciences rely on factual proof and evidence to be considered valid, there are no estimations allowed.

  2. Evaluating Scientific Method as a Way of Knowing

    It is a well-known fact that light behaves differently in different mediums, even for someone not from the scientific world who has seen objects through water can tell there is something funny happening with light as it passes through it.

  1. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    The best example of the theory is that of the Galapagos finches, he collected 13 different types and at first he believed to be completely different kind of birds because they did have different characteristics, the most striking difference was in their beaks, each bird had a different type of beak that was adapted to the way they obtained food.

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    Therefore language can certainly lead us to existential truth. Sense perception consists on the use of the five senses (sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch) to obtain sensory knowledge of our surroundings. Sense perception is an element of human experience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work