• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to knowledge about the future.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to knowledge about the future. Our approach to knowledge, its creation and acquisition is a complexity which can never be concretized. Constant growth, evolution, development, changes mark all knowledge and are intrinsic to our very existence, creating an ambivalence that leads to the eternal debate - how do we grasp the past and fit it hand in glove to make it productive to our present. The crux of the matter is that we look back into the past subjectively and seek to apply it objectively to our present and future. The process of creation is a continual flux, new knowledge is created, there is constant movement which escapes exactitude and definition. The subjectivity of the past can and does influence the basis of all new found theories, making them biased just like history. When we create our own history, we make sure we use bare facts, surveys, database, statistics and calibrations to record and preserve - these are tools that were previously not applied to the assimilation of knowledge as much as they are applied now. Which is not to say that they did not exist at all, they did in some form or the other. ...read more.

Middle

So, its not an exaggeration to say that all knowledge is based on a convoluted and circuitous method of accrediting, filtering, and deleting our perceptions about the world. Hints, clues, and even guesswork, obtained and retained, continue to fuel most of our knowledge irrespective of the areas of knowledge or of the ways of knowing. Michel De Nostredam is being talked about again because he's known to have predicted many major world events like the 9/11 disaster even though his prediction was not absolute and precise. It was a very vague description of the event and the disaster didn't happen the way he had predicted it to happen but certain parts in his premonition provide enough evidence that it is the World Trade Centers that he 'saw' being brought down. At forty-five degrees latitude, the sky will burn, Fire approaches the great new city.1 The common grounds that the past and future tread on, with the interface of knowledge playing its light footed role, is that we have depended on the collection of facts in the past and will continue to do so. "My interest is in the future because I am going to spend the rest of my life there." ...read more.

Conclusion

The one who did it the fastest would win the title of being the best loved son of Shiva. While Kartikeya whizzed around the world, Ganesh kept sitting. Just as he was about to complete the third circle around the world, Ganesh got up and went around his parents, Shiva and Parvati thrice and said "I won." The logic he gave to a petulant brother was "you went around 'the' world, I went around 'my' world. This ancient 'truth' is exactly how the present is functioning for most of us and the future will evolve based on this belief. This draws attention to the state of human psyche today, it is 'my' world, 'my' thoughts, 'my' is most important and all knowledge from the past will be scanned to suit this to apply it to 'my' future. Indians believe that the Indus valley civilization is the pioneer, the source of all other civilizations. We also believe that in the future, India is going to emerge as a super power. This may be illogical and only partially true, but we are objectively collecting knowledge and moving steadfastly in the direction of fulfilling that dream. We have the history and we have hope for the future, we just need the correct perspective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Humanities Today Paper. Humanities can be considered the combination of culture, history, art, literature, ...

    Architecture is deeply rooted, and dates back into our existence many centuries. The original designers of the ancient pyramids constructed buildings and statues that still stand to the present. The Romans are also classified as having some of the greatest architects in history.

  2. Scientific approach to History

    Meanwhile, prediction is hard in history for the inconsistent human mind. General laws for history are virtually impossible to establish. Also, measuring data in numerical terms pose a problem to historians at times. Hence, although general prediction can be given in both science and history, it might not imply that scientific method can be used for historical study.

  1. Historical orthodoxy's subjectivity and change

    In that respect people in the work force may find that their inability exceed their vernacular language capeabilities in order to understand technology and the jargon involved inhibits them, a factor which could be avoided by eliminating such semi useless abreviations.

  2. Compare and contrast knowledge which can be expressed in words/symbols with knowledge that cannot ...

    Well, though different theories suggest different ways: writing is the one of the most universal ways of understanding, it are composed of a variety of different symbols that create words. Through these written words, humans communicate with each other; for example, I am now writing this TOK essay by using English words and symbols.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    However, since the future has yet to occur, there is no certainty in whether the same consequence will take place. This could be due to an introduction of new unknown variables. What if tomorrow the sun doesn't rise, because a huge asteroid hit it out of our solar system so fast that we didn't notice?

  2. What do you understand by George Orwells comment that Who controls the past controls ...

    Literally, I would be correct to say that the Europeans stole every from the Indian - land, culture, and peace - as they were equiped with weapons and modern technolgy that could kill thousand. Hence the new comers were more powerful and stronger side than the Native Indian.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    It is also very difficult to find historical accounts that tell the neutral record of the event exactly as it happened therefore this means that the knowledge of the past is speculative. Although the knowledge about the past is speculative, it is very important as it is used to predict

  2. Hebraism and Hellenism by Matthew Arnold. Applying Arnold's analysis to modern day America.

    People have a right to their own opinion but they also at least think about the other side. Hellenism, the other way of thinking, is also still around. People who use a more Hellenic approach in live tend to think about what they do more and a decide if it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work