• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to knowledge about the future.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to knowledge about the future. Our approach to the past will be based on what evidence is available in the present. Our knowledge of the future is based on what we can infer about the past. It is important to recognise that neither knowledge of the past nor future will be certain. Knowledge form the past, history, is seen in forms such as newspapers, diaries, personal accounts, pictures, other forms of documentation, and artefacts. However there is no avoiding bias with any type of documentation. When a person documents the past, they choose what they are documenting is, the opinions and information will be biased. The job of a historian is to compile history, using information from many resources in order to provide a balanced interpretation of the past. ...read more.

Middle

"History repeats itself" a common phrase, as it is well known that what happened the past tends to happen again. However it is not completely true since you cannot have the exact same situation, and people again. However our future predictions and understanding of the present are based on similarities of causes and effects in the past. The reason for this is because the study of history brings a greater scope of understanding of human nature. The current economy crisis has taken many lessons from the crisis in 1929. In that time laissez-faire policy was used, which was a complete flop, and led the world into depression. This time round, the world has acted fast with it fiscal policy and the world is looking a lot more optimistically to the future. Predicting the future also often results in self-fulfilling prophecies. ...read more.

Conclusion

Until it happens, something unpredictable and unknown is unconceivable, because wouldn't have an explanation for it yet. Our recent past and present is based a lot on information in the media. We all know that 9/11 happened, because we've all seen it on the news. Most our knowledge of the recent future is based on secondary sources. However, Very large news companies such as CNN and the BBC, which dominate the source of information in the world. The only way to be certain of the truth is to be there yourself, which is not very practical. So there will be certain untruths in our knowledge of the present as well. So to conclude, our past is based on what sources of information are available in the present, and our approach to knowledge of the future is based on our past and present. Neither are completely certain, because to a certain degree the present isn't so certain either. Jenny Alexander TOK essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    Climatologists looks at past patterns of major climate changes, like ice ages, and current climate data to formulate a prediction for the future. A further example of how the past has affected the future is through language. In the past, only the wealthy had something other than dirt as their floor in their home; thus the saying, "dirt poor".

  2. work based project

    A majority gave the reason for interest down to the news reports they had been watching the day before about the continued drive by the government for a five-a day fruit and vegetables drive and living healthy. Others mentioned that the occupational therapist had explained to them before about the keeping healthy and exercising.

  1. Scientific approach to History

    Meanwhile, prediction is hard in history for the inconsistent human mind. General laws for history are virtually impossible to establish. Also, measuring data in numerical terms pose a problem to historians at times. Hence, although general prediction can be given in both science and history, it might not imply that scientific method can be used for historical study.

  2. What do you understand by George Orwells comment that Who controls the past controls ...

    Of course, this is absolutely wrong in logical perspective and this history should have been truthfully disclosed to the new generations of American.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    We are wary of accepting historical knowledge because we know that history was authorized by rulers and people in power. The historical accounts could have been compromised, and can present a distorted, prejudiced version of the past wars and truces.

  2. Without Knowledge of the Past, We Would Have No Knowledge At All

    This was successful and after making ten trans-Atlantic crossings , it was destroyed in 1937 while trying to land, 37 people were killed, though the actual reason why the Hindenburg burst into flames has been proved by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

  1. The historians task is to understand the past the human scientist, by contrast, is ...

    Malthusian's theory was therefore formulated to predict human behavior to help solve problems we may face in the future. Another example which would support the statement is what is now known as sustainability. Sustainability is meeting today?s needs for the growing populations as well as protecting the environment and resources for the future.

  2. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    futuristic events, thus the base of the knowledge of the future is the knowledge of the past. This emphasizes that the knowledge about the future is speculative as well. But as there are many accounts that clarify previous events, but none that clarify futuristic ones, then the knowledge about the future is more speculative, flawed and should be less trusted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work