• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparison - Plato, Buddha, Zoroaster etc.

Extracts from this document...


As we followed the philosophical discussions and ideas that the first books of 'The Republic' and Plato himself offered, we were left thinking as a quest to find definitions on justice, its virtue and impact on the good life. But unlike what we know, Plato is not the first to go into the philosophy for the search of the good life as there were philosophers at his and before his time that also based their discussion on the virtue on justice and the good life. More specifically we had a slight encounter with Confucius, Lao Tzu, Buddha and Zoroaster, all great thinkers and minds of their time and still remain with the title in ours. What Confucius was thinking of when discussing the ethical code of social conduct is what the human-like god T'ien (Heaven) had originally imposed on humankind. In order to become a worthy person one should develop moral habits and abide by the norms of society. ...read more.


They do not have the specific role in the ideal society, yet the implication on what they could do was more flexible than the one presented by Plato saying that one will be given one thing and be specifically trained and educated in it so it would lead to the greater good combined with everyone's work in the perfect society. What Lao Tzu also put an accent on, are the two very distinctive yet inseparable forces of yin and yang, whilst knowing that all things are in a permanent flux between one state and the opposite. Another thinker of this time dealing with the virtue of people and their place in the just society was Buddha, basing his belief on nirvana which was the aim for the 'enlightened' person. The way to reach it is by abandoning the egocentric preoccupation and embrace and practice karma. By giving priority to your inner-self Buddha believed that one reached and achieved the highest possible degree of mental awareness. ...read more.


Plato's 'noble lie' closely represents what Zoroaster brought up in the Philosophy world as to how a person should act. How they differentiate each other is that the latter has nothing to do with bad or good but a person's classification in a society, where Plato's myth shows where certain people belong, and why they're destined to live in this class and how act upon their role. When we compare all of the ideals and thought brought up by all these great thinkers, we can come up with a fine definition as to how an ideal society looks like, but it still brings the confusion as to how we should and could define justice. They lead us on the way to live a just and fulfilled life with the virtues we acquire, with the place we have in our society and the differentiation we make between what is good and what is bad, neither having to be clearly just. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is Gentleman? What are the characteristics of the Gentleman? Is it possible to ...

    Obviously, Confucius shown us the way how to live, but I disagree with his some points and I think that according to Confucius, no one is a gentleman nowadays. To prove it, I want to compare his statements with real example from life.

  2. In his work, Confucius represents wisdom through the way of being (concerning ...

    According to Li people have to be socially organized with rites, ceremonies and rituals. Li means the norms of behavior, the reduce of wishes and desires. The purpose of Li is to create such kind of reduces to make human nature more benevolent and kind.

  1. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    But as we have seen, this view limits God's power and he is not powerful, almighty sovereign of the universe. So therefore he cannot control events, but only lead them towards good. So this view of God does not coincide easily with the God of classical theism because there is

  2. Food Aid, who benefits?

    Millions of the rural and urban poor were cut out from opportunities for progress. Credit, extension, subsidies, and technical education all fell by the wayside as budgets were slashed, and the lifting of tariffs flooded local economies with imported foodstuffs often placed on the world market at prices below local costs of production.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work