• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

context is all

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alfonso Gonz�lez Ort�z 2H Theory of Knowledge Essay "Context is all" American School of Puebla Miss Dalit "Context is all" (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing as truth? When you process this statement and this question in your brain you immediately try to understand all words in the phrase and define them so then you can get a complete understood conclusion of everything. In the first place let's define the word context as the part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning. For someone to understand something you must first look where that something is taking place. For example if you say "Chile" you need to know the surrounding of that word because it has two meanings; a kind of vegetable and a country in South America. If you don't take a look outside that word you won't be able to understand it. The other important word to define in this statement is "truth". There are basically two types of truth. The first one is your own perception of things and you say it is true for the perspective of your own person. ...read more.

Middle

Now that we have defined the important words in this statement we can observe how context matter in different areas of life. In some aspects like math the context of the problem will not affect the result of itself. I the other hand if we take for example the theme of some kind of history you are in the need to establish the environment of what you are talking about for someone to understand the context. We can conclude from this paragraph that in some cases there is no such thing as truth but in some others it does exist but not completely. The truth can vary, and there is no such thing as a one hundred percent true statement. Why do I say this? Simply, there will be always different opinions of people about everything and depending on the time and the place you are it will be the kind of truth you are going to obtain. Let's get an example of religion vs. physics. If we get as an example the creation of man, religion and the science of physics will say a completely different statement. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we now think about such an area as arts, there are some similar troubles there as well. If one wants to interpret a painting, or a musical composition, to find out what the artist meant by his creation, many things have to be taken into account: such as the time when he lived, his country of birth and residence, and whatnot. For example if we think what the Spanish architect Antonio Gaud� would design, we would be mistaken trying to deduce that his style was similar to ones of other architects of the same epoch and origin. He spent a lot of time alone, and therefore developed an extremely original style of his own. If one was to attempt to comment on any of Gaud�'s creations, he would be in trouble without a proper research in advance. This implies to many cases in analytical criticism - no stereotypes should be made to achieve a reasonable result, and as much background information as possible about the artist should be taken into account to compile an objective result. You can firmly say that there is no such thing as a completely true thing in the whole world. http://www.coursework.info/International_Baccalaureate/Theory_of_Knowledge/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context http://www.wacc.org.uk/wacc/publications/media_development/archive/1997_3/truth_in_context_or_what_does_truth_mean http://redescolar.ilce.edu.mx/redescolar/act_permanentes/historia/histdeltiempo/mundo/prehis/t_evolu.htm http://www.adorador.com/temasdoctrinales/25_el_hombre_su_creacion.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Tok essay- context is all

    Critics of this theory would use Margaret Atwood's statement as proof that there could be no real truth, as opposed to setting a condition wit which truth should be viewed to make it relevant. The second censure of this theory is that correspondence can never be absolute.

  2. "Context is all" (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    Where in the majority of Western countries it is seen as morally "wrong" to have more than two wives as well as illegal, in some Arab countries such as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia it is acceptable to have more than one wife if you can support them.

  1. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    I do not think of it as such. In my opinion these are just different interpretations of the same facts, different sides of the same coin so to say. It seems as though the study of history is bound to be full of positive statements i.e.

  2. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    and it is a fact that most people accept. Truth that is socially accepted is depends on one's definition of society. My definition of society is that it is an organized group of persons associated together for religious, cultural, political, patriotic or other purposes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work