• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing as truth?

Extracts from this document...


5 ?Context is all' (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing as truth? What is truth and what is true? Is there such a thing as a truth or just what we perceive to be true at any given time? There are some circumstances where truth is certain. I am sitting in my study and I am writing my essay. This statement is true and hardly refutable unless we try and argue that all we see and feel is what our senses perceive. What the question is asking is whether there is such a thing as universal truth, a statement which cannot be refuted regardless of the situation, and which holds true across time and place. The definition of truth is that something is true always, everywhere and is independent of belief. There are three tests for truth, the first of which is proof by inductive logic, the second by actually testing a truth and the third being pragmatic. In George Orwell?s dystopian novel ?1984? a character states 2+2=5. We know this not true and can say immediately that two and two make four because this is what is mathematically accepted when we add up the definitions of two and two. Therefore this is a-priori truth and a deductive syllogism. No matter what context we put this statement in, it will 15 always be true, be it in the addition of two items (such as a sock and a piece of gum) ...read more.


2 This is a method of demonstrating Godel?s theorems in word form. 2 ________________ believed to have carried out genocide upon the people of bordering Armenia. The official position of the Turkish government until this day is complete denial that a massacre occurred. However, in Armenia historians tell us that thousands of innocent 45 Armenians were slaughtered by Ottoman soldiers. This demonstrates how the context changes our understanding of the truth of historical events. ?Thou shalt not kill? is a tenet that a religion with billions of followers states in its first teachings and is generally accepted not just as a piece of guidance on how to behave but as a moral absolute, and as a statement of true fact. However, ?why do we kill people 50 who are killing people to show that killing people is wrong??3 A person convicted of murder in the state of Texas is automatically eligible for the death penalty. It is generally considered unacceptable to kill, however, if the person is being punished for a crime that he has committed then the death penalty is in some countries applicable and accepted, thereby contradicting the so-called ?moral truth? put forward by religion. 55 The Iraq war has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, mainly Iraqi civilians who have no part in the actual conflict but who were living in Baghdad when bombs started landing, or simply present in a market the day a suicide bomber struck. ...read more.


We can comprehend that if we run into a wall we will knock ourselves out. If we had neutrino brains and we had developed from neutrino ancestors, our brains would be able 85 to process the spaces between the atoms and we would in fact be able to move through walls. What we perceive is not a direct translation of the world around us. Each organism has developed from different ancestors and perceives the world to his own benefit. A monkey, Richard Dawkins claims, needs to be able to visualise a 3D world of 4 ________________ branches and trees, whereas a water skater lias no neea tor a 3d world or a perception of 90 gravity because its whole world is on the surface of a pond. The context in which the world is interpreted changes from species to species. It is convenient for humans to see colours (differentiating wave-lengths) because we live predominantly in the light, however for a bat living in darkness most of its life, it is more suitable for it to use its ears to perceive colours. The context changes the usefulness of external sensory 95 information. Evolution has enabled humans to operate successfully in the context of Dawkins? middle world. We exist in a world where we must make sense of situations as we find them. That may involve making judgements and evaluating historical, artistic, mathematical, religious and moral information. I believe that there is no such thing as absolute truth, and that 100 Margaret Atwood was right when she said ?context is all?. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. "Context is all" (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    know of anybody that had one, but as soon as I had it in my pocket I started realising that a lot of people around me had it as well. Language is the use of characters, symbols, images and sounds as a means of communicating a message.[5] We assume that

  2. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    An example of universal truth would be that gravity causes all objects thrown in the air to fall back to the ground. This statement would be considered a universal truth because it has been proven using more than one area of knowledge (science and mathematics)

  1. Context is all. from the novel The Handmaids Tale by Margaret Atwood brings a ...

    This might hold true in some cases, but we know of situations where merging takes place and "1+1" actually results in "1". For example, adding 1 unit of clay to another, results in one larger lump of clay. Thus, many mathematical statements such as these do not lose their context-dependence

  2. Difference of Truth and knowldge

    It is almost impossible to prove a theory in science, as they are just that, theories. Therefore passionate conviction and the statement "I am certain" are key in the scientific method and the area of knowledge as a whole.?In history passionate conviction can sometimes be used to justify knowledge.

  1. Context is all. Does this mean that there is no thing as the truth?

    Perhaps this is true, and some things such as rape or murder, can never be justified and are thus always wrong. In this case the relativity would come into play in the decision between the lesser of two or more evils; for example in deciding whether one person's pain and

  2. Tok essay- context is all

    On the other hand, there are three main problems with this theory which cause it to be criticized by modern thinkers of today. The first criticism of this theory is the problem with facts. The theory relies on a truth being equivalent to a fact, however that beings into play our reliance on what is fact.

  1. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    For people in that day and age, it seemed true. The geocentric model was considered as an accurate portrayal of reality. Just like atoms and molecules and such for us today. What if the atoms are portrayed wrong? If someone in later years would discover that the whole theory of

  2. Why punish with the death penalty?

    The second fundamental feature of retribution is that the degree of punishment should correspond to the degree of the crime. This differs from the arbitrary revenge and attempts to provide a structure creating a ?methodical revenge?, a morally right revenge.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work