David Hume's idea regarding miracles

KI: What, if anything, would convince you that a miracle had occurred?

In order to accept the possibility of a miracle, I need to have faith that a higher being exist- a God or deity. We need to dissect the obscurities that lie within the question like the word “miracle.” It can be defined as an event that defies the laws of nature and in order to violate these laws- some force needs to put these laws in place. Newton’s law of inertia follows the ways of nature stating that an object that is not moving will not move until a force acts upon it and that an object that is moving will not change its velocity until a net force acts upon it. The law of inertia is reasonably sound and consistent against the test of time. A miracle would have to oppose and violate the guidelines under this law. There cannot be a logical explanation behind the miracle. A bullet suddenly stopping at the peak of its speed is a miracle when it is an inch away from piercing a person. Under this circumstance there is not possible reason for the bullet to stop for there isn’t any force that is halting the pathway of the bullet.

Join now!

However, David Hume argues that it is impossible to deduce that causes can be determined by the effects and miracles are the only type of evidence that can possible support theistic claims. Hume discusses the belief that a miracle cannot be a common event nor is a negative event. Miracles are associated as an act made by a religious and higher authority; thus all miracles have a positive correlation. Hume states that if the falsehood of the miracle occurring is less probable, then the event occurred must be a miracle. As a result, his beliefs goes against my reasoning in ...

This is a preview of the whole essay