• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between a scientific question and a non-scientific question.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

P1 ? Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. A hypotheses it is an educated guess based on observation. It is rational explanation of a single event or phenomenon based upon what is observed, but which has not been proved. It can be supported or refuted by experimentation or continued observation. Hypotheses become a theory once they have been verified and accepted to be true, A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times. A scientific law must be simple, true, universal and absolute. It is meant to describe an action or set of actions, they do not need any complex external proofs they are accepted at face value based upon the fact that they have always been observed to be true. The development of a simple theory by the scientific method starts with an observation that evokes a question. Second using logical and previous knowledge, state a possible answer, called hypotheses then perform an experiment or test, after that publish the findings in a peer-reviewed journal then verification, other scientist read about the experiment and try to duplicate, in time and if experiments continue to support the hypotheses it becomes a theory. ...read more.

Middle

I believed this simile largely speaks the truth. The green and budding twigs may represent existing species, and those produced during each former year may represent the long succession of extinct species...The limbs divides into greater branches, and these into lesser and lesser branches, were themselves once, when the tree was small, budding twigs, and this connexion of the former and present buds by ramifying branches may well represent the classification of all extinct and living species in groups subordinate to groups...From the first growth of the tree, many a limb and branch has decay and dropped off,and these lost branches of various sizes may represent those whole orders,families and genera which have now no living representatives, and which are known to us only from having been found in a fossil state. As buds give rise by growth to fresh buds, and these,if vigorous, branch out and overtop on all feebler branch, so by generation i believe it has been with the tree of life, which fills with its dead and broken branches the crust of the earth, and covers the surface with its ever branching and beautiful ramifications. (Charles Darwin, 1859) M1: Differentiate between a scientific question and a non-scientific question. A scientific question has a real answer that can be answered in a logical way, andit has been tested, and this means you can carry out an experiment or take measurements to answer the question. ...read more.

Conclusion

reviewers, the reviewers have a certain knowledge on the subject area, they will analyse the paper and see if everything is correct and if it there is nothing that Had been overlooked. After that the paper will come back to the editor where he will say if it need to be revised again or if he will accept it or reject it, then the article is returned to the researchers with the feedback and any request for review, she will revised it and send back to the editor, the editor will decide if he will publish it or not. D1: Explain why new theories are often resisted by the scientific community, and how unorthodox science discoveries eventually become accepted, using the concept of paradigm shifts and scientific revolutions, and how unorthodox science discoveries become accepted. The concept of falsifiability by Karl Popper It is the belief that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific hypothesis or theory. The idea is that no theory is completely correct, but if not falsified, it can be accepted as truth. Falsifiability is a useful tool for generating theories that are testable and realistic. If a falsifiable theory is tested and the results are significant, than it can become accepted as scientific truth. Falsifiability is very strict in its definitions and does not take into account that many sciences are observational and descriptive, ________________ Page ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    485 - 420 BCE). Written evidence is the fundamental feature of any historical explanation but still submitted to doubt as it is only one persons viewpoint on a matter. Even though, a scientific explanation requires a background of careful observation necessitating all five senses, technology and mathematics play a central role in the development of scientific ideas.

  2. TOK IB IA presentation. On what basis do spiritual beliefs rest? I have ...

    but if you look at the video, it says somewhere in the first part that in 80% of the cases, the children could recollect their strange and unusual deaths. Maybe, it's the trauma at the time of the death that etches these memories into the soul and carries certain memories of the past lives into the next life.

  1. Rebuttal paper nasa

    REAGAN WANTED NASA TO DEVELOP A PERMANENTLY MANNED SPACE STATION WITH IN A DECADE. NASA'S EXPLORATION CONTINUED, NOT EVEN THE LOSS OF SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA(WHICH COST APPROXIMATELY $145 BILLION) JADED THE ENTHUSIASM ABOUT SPACE TRAVEL. THEN IN 2004 PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH INTRODUCED THE THIRD GOAL- TO RETURN TO THE

  2. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    Therefore, this researcher would suggest that a mixed methodology be used to understand the causality of leadership effectiveness. Research indicates that the conception of one?s reality will ultimately dictate their approach to problem solving. Applying Methodological Approaches to Leadership Studies Hopen (2002)

  1. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    But why were they so unacceptable to be so sure about their theories? Because they had too many confirmation bias and ignored the problem of induction. That is, if they only intended to find the evidence that could ?prove? their theory to be true, they would only see the evidence that stood on their side.

  2. In the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge, how problematic is the problem of ...

    So, after completing a series of experiments that support the Third Law, one is justified in maintaining that the Law holds all cases.

  1. Evaluating Scientific Method as a Way of Knowing

    The latter argument can be supported by the placebo effect and how it may affect the patients using the medicine. Furthermore, this also brings to light the limitations of the scientific method. Since homeopathy involves diluting the medicine to such low concentrations, the hypothesis to test the medicine should be as precise and also the ?observer effect? (reference)

  2. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    It's certainly ruthless in its pursuit. But what about when parents use it as a monitoring tool on their children? Parents might think that this is only a harmless but effective way to ensure children?s safety on the Internet, especially when the kids are young and vulnerable to predators on the net.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work