• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between a scientific question and a non-scientific question.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

P1 ? Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. A hypotheses it is an educated guess based on observation. It is rational explanation of a single event or phenomenon based upon what is observed, but which has not been proved. It can be supported or refuted by experimentation or continued observation. Hypotheses become a theory once they have been verified and accepted to be true, A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times. A scientific law must be simple, true, universal and absolute. It is meant to describe an action or set of actions, they do not need any complex external proofs they are accepted at face value based upon the fact that they have always been observed to be true. The development of a simple theory by the scientific method starts with an observation that evokes a question. Second using logical and previous knowledge, state a possible answer, called hypotheses then perform an experiment or test, after that publish the findings in a peer-reviewed journal then verification, other scientist read about the experiment and try to duplicate, in time and if experiments continue to support the hypotheses it becomes a theory. ...read more.

Middle

I believed this simile largely speaks the truth. The green and budding twigs may represent existing species, and those produced during each former year may represent the long succession of extinct species...The limbs divides into greater branches, and these into lesser and lesser branches, were themselves once, when the tree was small, budding twigs, and this connexion of the former and present buds by ramifying branches may well represent the classification of all extinct and living species in groups subordinate to groups...From the first growth of the tree, many a limb and branch has decay and dropped off,and these lost branches of various sizes may represent those whole orders,families and genera which have now no living representatives, and which are known to us only from having been found in a fossil state. As buds give rise by growth to fresh buds, and these,if vigorous, branch out and overtop on all feebler branch, so by generation i believe it has been with the tree of life, which fills with its dead and broken branches the crust of the earth, and covers the surface with its ever branching and beautiful ramifications. (Charles Darwin, 1859) M1: Differentiate between a scientific question and a non-scientific question. A scientific question has a real answer that can be answered in a logical way, andit has been tested, and this means you can carry out an experiment or take measurements to answer the question. ...read more.

Conclusion

reviewers, the reviewers have a certain knowledge on the subject area, they will analyse the paper and see if everything is correct and if it there is nothing that Had been overlooked. After that the paper will come back to the editor where he will say if it need to be revised again or if he will accept it or reject it, then the article is returned to the researchers with the feedback and any request for review, she will revised it and send back to the editor, the editor will decide if he will publish it or not. D1: Explain why new theories are often resisted by the scientific community, and how unorthodox science discoveries eventually become accepted, using the concept of paradigm shifts and scientific revolutions, and how unorthodox science discoveries become accepted. The concept of falsifiability by Karl Popper It is the belief that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific hypothesis or theory. The idea is that no theory is completely correct, but if not falsified, it can be accepted as truth. Falsifiability is a useful tool for generating theories that are testable and realistic. If a falsifiable theory is tested and the results are significant, than it can become accepted as scientific truth. Falsifiability is very strict in its definitions and does not take into account that many sciences are observational and descriptive, ________________ Page ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    485 - 420 BCE). Written evidence is the fundamental feature of any historical explanation but still submitted to doubt as it is only one persons viewpoint on a matter. Even though, a scientific explanation requires a background of careful observation necessitating all five senses, technology and mathematics play a central role in the development of scientific ideas.

  2. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    being exact Final Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations? This question has taunted philosopher`s minds in recent years. Before appointing the similarities and differences between these knowledge areas, we must understand specifically what each of them mean.

  1. TOK essay question 8.

    Therefore, there is no rejection to say that it is possible to have objective knowledge, without relying on culture and own experience. They have an advantage if themselves for someone who has objective knowledge. Lastly, from the discussion and examples above that I have supported my thesis, which is the

  2. Prescribed titles question number 8

    The art works are made in the artist's own feelings, thoughts, personal taste, and cultural background, or the art works could be meaningless. But people are still trying to perceive it through the colors, shape, lines, and texture of the art work.

  1. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    Dozens of passwords for our various accounts are needed, such as email, Facebook, Instant Messenger, bank accounts, Apple store and Amazon etc. We would suffer great loss when our information is collected easily by others and used for criminal means.

  2. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    of a given leadership style or trait, the organization attempts to justify the continuation or implementation of a particular approach to leadership. While this would typically be a viable approach, the reality is that the evolution of business calls for expansion into other ways for evaluating leadership?s affect on organizational results.

  1. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    confidently because of a huge mass of experience he has done before. All of these three classical examples were saying one thing-a theory that can explain everything, explains nothing because it refuses the potential for the theory to be wrong, thus, not falsifiable.

  2. In the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge, how problematic is the problem of ...

    So, after completing a series of experiments that support the Third Law, one is justified in maintaining that the Law holds all cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work