• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Difference of Truth and knowldge

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is passionate conviction ever sufficient for justifying knowledge???Two men are standing in the street, one looks at the other and says, "If I flip this coin an equal number of times, I am certain I will always achieve identical numbers of both heads and tails." He proceeds with flipping the coin ten times, only achieving two heads and eight tails. This man was certain he would achieve equal numbers of heads and tails, as the theoretical probability of the problem was fifty-fifty. On the other hand, it is certain that the results are random, as the coin could land on either side an infinite amount of times. Here we see one of many major differences between the phrase "I am certain" and "it is certain". ?"It is certain" relates to facts, research, scientific experiment and induction, empirical evidence, mathematics and proof. "It is certain" is usually a statement of truth and authority. It is an idea or statement that is backed up by facts, such as taking two apples and placing them in a bag with five more, and deducing the statement "It is certain two plus five is seven" as seven apples now occupy the bag. "I am certain" falls under the category of reason and logic as a way of knowing.?While the phrase "it is certain" is usually accepted as a statement of truth, "I am certain" is a more personal statement and so depends more on one's cultural background. ...read more.

Middle

However, iIt is difficult to relate the statement to whether something is ethically wrong or right, as ethics and morals are a result of religion, culture and background, and therefore tend to vary from place to place and person to person. Therefore, when it comes to ethics ethics as an area of knowledge, passionate conviction can be used and it relates strongly to the statement "I am certain".?Whilst one traditionally thinks of science as objective and unemotional, passionate conviction is actually a key step in the development of theories and laws. The most widely accepted scientific method is as follows - a hypothesis is created, both controlled and independent variables are identified, the hypothesis is tested and the results are then analysed. After this final step the hypothesis is modified and retested, and the process continues until a theory is created. Passionate conviction comes in at both the beginning when the hypothesis is created, but also at the end when a scientist is convinced that the results came out as they did for whatever reason and attempts to show the scientific world that he is correct. It is only when the theory is challenged by the scientific community and they cannot disprove it that it becomes a "law". A law is considered "the truth" until it is shown to be false, which is still possible. ...read more.

Conclusion

Unless a person can provide mathematical proof to support their arguments then the statement "I am certain..." cannot be used as ato validation validate of knowledge. A mathematical proof has tomust be accepted by a large majority of people to be useful in supporting a statement. Using and repeating numerous steps and finding the idea works in multiple situations is the general idea of mathematical proof. If one is certain that they have the answer to y=x they will generally have to prove it before it is accepted as true. However, once it is proven in a number of ways understandable by others, one can then say "it is certain y=x". Most mathematical ideas were developed thousands of years ago, and have been tried and tested since. Unlike other areas where ideas and theories are constantly changing, mathematics has remained relatively the same, and is therefore the only area of knowledge where passionate conviction can hardly ever be used to justify knowledge.?Overall, "it is certain" is an example of reason and logic, where as "I am certain" is an emotion which relies on one's upbringing. Passionate conviction is used as the main justification of knowledge in the arts and in ethics, but in other areas such as history and science passionate conviction plays only a part in the validation of knowledge. In mathematics, passionate conviction fails to be useful to any extent. In conclusion, passionate conviction can be sufficient to justify knowledge in certain areas, but inadequate in others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    This is because it can be justified with incontrovertible empirical evidence and the application of deductive reasoning (i.e. the Pythagorean Theorem). It also can be seen to refer to Plato's idea of 'true, justified belief'. Mathematics can be viewed as an ideal of Plato's beliefs because (as seen above)

  2. Truth.People think that truth is relative because they could look at others points of ...

    For example, Ishaq Rabin was assassinated by his own people for encouraging a peace treaty with Palestine and giving Palestinians some of the land controlled by Israel. This brutal act shows that people are stubborn and this is caused by the imperfect truth that has been changed or distorted.

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

    Thus, in mathematics, truths are "hard" truths because they are always able to be proven. But is it always safe to say that if a mathematical concept can be proven, then it must be a truth? In the field of mathematical induction, one is given an equation to prove and must do so using manipulation of identities.

  2. Tok History. My thesis is that although history and our ethics will always ...

    For instance, when I go out in weekends, she restricts me in such a way that I feel I can't really enjoy myself and spend a nice time. So in response, I tell her part of the truth. I let her know where I'll be at first, but not were

  1. Vemos las cosas tal y como son, o tal y como somos

    Los personajes m�s renombrados en los campos de la ciencia de su tiempo pod�an hacer cualquier afirmaci�n, y esta ser�a respetada por la comunidad cient�fica. La Edad Media fue otro momento de manipulaci�n de las leyes de la ciencia.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, arts, and ethics?

    With a given mathematical problem, there exists a definite solution that does not vary with the approach. Due to the very nature of the subject, every arithmetic approach to a problem would amount to the same thing as logic dictates it to be so when it comes to concrete numbers and values.

  1. Should we pursue the Truth at any cost?

    This is something that has been seen in the path, and will continue to be seen in the future. It is an inevitable prospect because the way in which people's view differ is so great, there will never be a path that will be agreed on by all.

  2. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    There could be opposing facts but people tend to ignore those and only notice the fact that makes their argument stronger. From my personal experience, I do something similar. When writing reports, I tend to only write facts that would support my hypothesis and exclude information that oppose to my hypothesis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work