• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Different cultures have different truths." "A truth is that which can be accepted universally." What are the implications for knowledge of agreeing with these opposite statements?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Serena Wales 12/11/03 TOK "Different cultures have different truths." "A truth is that which can be accepted universally." What are the implications for knowledge of agreeing with these opposite statements? "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set yet free." A powerful, simple statement, taken from the bible. The eternal struggle of mankind, however, has been to find the truth, and this has proven rather difficult. Is there, as suggested in this quote, only one truth? Or are there different truths, dependant on cultural background or society? Unfortunately, the question as it is phrased is flawed. Both statements are false, so any knowledge gained from either one is also false. Truth is not determined by how many people accept something, whether those people all belong to a single culture, or to the whole world. Truth is determined by reality, and "truth" is the quality of any statement that correctly describes any aspect of reality. If a thing is true, it does not matter if nobody accepts it, it is still true. If a thing is false, it does not matter if everybody accepts it, it is still false. ...read more.

Middle

If different cultures have different truths on the same subject, than there is no truth. Just because my culture says that the world was created by God in seven days, that does not mean it is the truth. It is what we believe, but that does not make it true. Contrarily, scientists say that we evolved from lesser beings, and that the world was created through a 'big bang' which created the universe. This is what they believe to be the truth: it does not mean it is. If nothing can be agreed upon, and there are differing opinions, than there is no truth. The opposite statement, that truth is something that everyone agrees with, is more valid, at least in my opinion. Everyone can agree on some things, and would consider them truths: the world is round, people should be born with two eyes, the Second World War started in 1939. That there is a group agreement on these issues, from both those who are expert on these topics and amateurs, means that we can most likely accept them as being of reality. ...read more.

Conclusion

What is learned in an Ethics class is more a matter of cultural influences. People in Nigeria may believe that they have the right to stone a woman to death for adultery, while in Europe we would consider this a most improper thing to do. In Japan, it is considered rude to look a superior in the eye whist talking to them, but in America it would be considered rude to not face them. Because of these differences, it is most certainly not true to state that "Looking someone in the eye is rude.", although that is the truth of the culture. As I said earlier, truth cannot be changed. What would be correct is to state that "In Japan, looking someone in the eye is rude." This is true everywhere to everyone. These two statements also come from opposite schools of philosophy: those that believe in subjective truth and objective truth. To agree with both of these statements is impossible, since they both contradict each other. Agreeing with either of them, however, is also wrong. Even if no one knows the absolute truth about something yet, that does not mean that the present answers are a suitable replacement. Truth does not change, no matter who accepts it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. "Context is all" (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    It's not until we change the context, e.g.: present day, that the truth loses all its validity. This shows that the truth we derive from the validity of the sources is completely relative depending in the context which it is presented in, which means that the truths we know now may not be considered truths in the future.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    And one must note that when ethics are used in this way, reason plays a large part because one must think objectively. For instance, I have a reasonable amount of education on a few of the major religions in world - Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

  1. TOK - Accepted Conventions

    Is it morally correct? By weighing the two options, one will discover more about his own values and ethics, another Area of Knowledge. This plays a large role in life, as ethics will ultimately determine our interaction with other human beings and in turn our successes in the future.

  2. Difference of Truth and knowldge

    Even though a person can reach a conclusion through experiments and research, that conclusion is not necessarily correct. Science, in my opinion, attempts to understand why things happen the way they do and as a result theories are constantly changing.

  1. Context is all. Does this mean that there is no thing as the truth?

    All units of weight or length, for example, are truths created by humans and it is irrelevant whether they are different in other paradigms as they have been created to function exclusively in our reality. If nearly anything can be justified through context, can anything be true?

  2. Different cultures have different truths.

    It is a mathematical fact that 1+1=2. 1+1=2 for me, for my best friend, for the prime minister of Great Britain and for the computer on which I am typing this essay. It can never equal 4, no matter how much my history teacher may tell me that it does.

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, arts, and ethics?

    While this analogy sounds too mechanical to be altogether associated with artistic values, the fact remains that even within the traditions of art an artist has a vast amount of freedom due to the sheer number of possible stimuli for each of the senses.

  2. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    These claims were used to support the ?doctrine of Just War?. The two countries? political leaders then changed tack and used the excuse ?the end justifies the means? to support their actions. The name ?Operation Iraqi Liberation? gives people a sense of patriotism and that what they are doing is right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work