• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Plato's definition of knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Name: Pranav Sharma (25) Class: 3.15 POD Essay 1 Knowledge Knowledge as defined by the Oxford English dictionary is "expertise, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject; what is known in a particular field or in total; facts and information; or lastly awareness or familiarity gained by experience of a fact or situation." Plato, on the other hand justifies it as "justified true belief". This definition and method of defining knowledge, despit being quite effective and being used for centuries, is far too vague and cannot work in several situations. One reason for this would be that justification can mean importantly different things. ...read more.

Middle

Plato's definition is also limited as he himself said that he cannot accept the definition "justified true belief," since he believes that we have knowledge that we are born with and are unaware of, in other words, it exists first without the presence of any corresponding belief. A young child knows who his parents and siblings are, he knows how to swallow and breathe etcetera. It is because these things are present in the subconscious part of his mind. Therefore, not all knowledge can be defined by Plato's definition as there are several other form's of knowledge that are not based on beliefs or justifications. These are two reasons why I believe that Platos' definition of knowledge is too weak and vague. ...read more.

Conclusion

They are also considered to be true as they each fulfill atleast one of the three theories of truths. Lastly, majority of the people in the world believe both of the claims. So, if we are to go with Plato's definition o knowledge, we know that these claims are true. However, there is still a lot of skepticism in the world considering whether dinosaurs really exist and such, so we cannot be entirely sure of whether or not these claims are true. If there is contradictary evidence then the claim will have to be reviewed. To sum it up, I believe that knowledge cannot be defined by one single term or one definition but it is supposed to be considered on a case to case basis. Different type of problems need to have different ways of deciding whether or not something is true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. The Matrix And Plato's Cave

    The matrix shows us that the reality, as a harmonious uniformity of matter, as materiality, is potentially unreal, due to the fact that we simply cannot prove that what we see is not the product of our thinking.

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    Even if the student shows a pattern not yet noticed, the experiment will often be repeated by PhD scientists to show it is correct. This however implies the problems with authority, in which authority does not always imply correctness - well established scientists have been known to edit ("fix")

  1. Comparing Flatland and Plato's analogy of the cave.

    Imaging is at the lowest level of development. For example, take the shadows. If you know a shadow is something real then you are beyond the state of imagination which implies that a person is unaware of observation and amounts to illusion and ignorance.

  2. Reliability of Sigmund Freud's claims

    Deductive reasoning is easier to believe because it seems intuitively obvious. But sometimes it can lead to far of conclusion, because it can be used to prove anything (Rocks cannot fly, My sister can't fly, therefore my sister is a rock).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work