• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the roles of language and reason in history

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Discuss the roles of language and reason in history History is often considered as a synonym for truth and certainty. But history is such an area of knowledge that poses a number of deterrents in our quest for knowledge as the knowers cannot discover the past forthwith. This so called remembering the past is no easy nut-it is a complex web rendered difficult to disentangle given that the historical event takes place in the past; it is gone and irrecoverable!. Thus to write a history a historian has to resort to his reason, and obviously the said historian will write the historical accounts in his native language only. Thus language and reason stand as pillars for creating the foundations of history. Reasoning is closely connected with emotion, sense perception and language. In fact language is at the very core of reasoning. Language is a vast unmapped territory fascinating our intelligence and casting spells on our reason. According to ?Max Mueller, there can be no language without reason, and no reason without language?2. Through this essay I would like to elucidate the roles of language and reason in history. My essay will also inquire into if language and reason as ways of knowing can pervert a historical account from the path of truth? If a historian endeavours to explore the past, his step surely is to find out all the possible facts. ...read more.

Middle

So can language be considered as a cornerstone for the historians? As a child, I was mesmerized by wars. I read the most bewitching account of war in Homer?s Iliad where he talks about the legendary Trojan War. Was it a war or only a myth? Nothing can be said as Homer derived the epic poem from primeval sources. In the epic, Helen is limned as the most beautiful woman on earth while Achilles as the grandest warrior. Now what can we say as to the authenticity of Homer?s claims? Were the characters for real or it was his national bias to portray them as Hellenic legends? I read the Greek epic through translation only. Did the translator write the exact replication of Homer?s words, or he amalgamated the facts with his presumptions, giving them a hyperbolized touch? Is the epic not twice removed from reality then? Language is not as simple or straightforward as it is considered. Sometimes it becomes very difficult to pin down the meaning of the words with complete precision. Language is neither innocent nor magical, and can be used to manipulate the way we see things. Language can also be used to influence and persuade people. It can sometimes be illusory if the historian uses weasel words or words laden with emotions. Language is power. If it can be used to educate or enlighten people; it can also be used to fuel the flames of hatred. ...read more.

Conclusion

If once we start believing that the French are arrogant and the English cold, we will notice a number of examples that can confirm our prejudice. There is in fact no way we can justify our beliefs even on the basis of experience. In my opinion a historical account based on reason cannot be considered true as reasoning is a complex process and reasoning modes are not universal. Most of the tenets of rationalism have evolved from Greek culture or Confucianism-without any convergence of a single set of common rules. Thus reason is nothing but our faith and faith differs from person to person. My reason says that it was Hector and not Achilles who was the greatest warrior as the former fought for his country while the latter for his pride. But will all agree with me? To conclude I would like to say that although language and reason are very conducive to a historian in his quest for knowledge, they cannot be fully relied on. The historian being a man of flesh and blood may be prone to the venom of pride, prejudice, laziness and ignorance. Truth is stranger than fiction, and the historian may befuddle us through his biased language and imaginative thinking. Before coming under the sway of enticing history we must use our senses and put the historical account to the test of evidence and truth, always keeping in mind that history is nothing but a fable agreed upon. (Napoleon Bonaparte) ( of 5) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history

    If there is no language, there can't be any history at all. Because history is all about the descriptions of things that already happened. But every one has his or her own way of describing and telling things. Have you ever herd two different people telling the same story in two different ways?

  2. TOK History Essay

    uncertainty to the existence of certain historical events that have not been proven through logical reasoning.

  1. Some people say that religious beliefs can be neither justified nor refuted by reason. ...

    space nor limitless time, neither any kind of being...'8 An essential part of Buddhist knowledge, therefore, depends on the firm belief that an absolutely pure state of consciousness can be reached. No follower really understands the condition of nirvana but it is his eternal hope and underlies every attempt at gaining knowledge.

  2. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history.

    I will be arguing that language and reason do have definitive roles in history. If we are to look at how WW2 may be taught in Germany, we have to perhaps look at Germany's stance on the event now. Indeed a survey in Sarah Ann Gordon's Book Hitler, Germans and

  1. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history

    For me reason means the ability to think, form judgments or draw conclusions. Reason could give the answer to everything. If language is a builder, reason could be a planner, before you build something you have to plan first, like the builder if they do not get the plan from the planner they won't be able to build anything.

  2. TOK: What are the effects of biased language and unsound reasoning on history?

    For example Mien Kampf is the biography of Adolf Hitler written by Lands- berg Am Lech. The book shows Hitler?s struggle to power. The biographer has given colour to Hitler?s escapades to the best of his capacity using his reason.

  1. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history

    past but how can we be sure that whatever that is presented is correct and accurate? Yet, we deduced that whatever that we learnt from these textbooks are correct since we know that all teachers use correct and reliable resources to teach.

  2. There are no distinctions between what is true and false, Discuss with relation to ...

    In reality what we believe is true could actually be false but since we have supporting evidence and faith in our claim it will be considered to be true. It is important to distinguish between what is true and what is false because if we do not, then we will

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work