• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative data in supporting knowledge claims in the human sciences.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

T.O.K human sciences essay. Human sciences (such as psychology, economics, anthropology, sociology, etc.) attempt to understand human behavior and learn more about human nature but our behaviors are often unpredictable and difficult to interpret due to our language, reason, and creativity. So how can we expect to apply scientific principles to discover more about human actions? Also how accurate can we say our conclusions are which we make based upon the data we collect? To endeavor into the understanding of the human mind we must ask these questions which relate to our understanding of the degree at which quantitative and qualitative data can be deemed reliable. Quantitative data is defined as data which is expressed in a numerical form and traditionally this data has been considered more trust worthy because it seems to supply us with hard facts and values which we are easily able to interpret. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore we are able to place expectations using the quantitative data recorded from experiments. If these assumptions that have been made in Economics become proved to be incorrect or not entirely correct to all situations limits and conditions are placed upon these rules and theories such as; that the consumer has full and complete knowledge of the market. Qualitative data is defined as data that is expressed not in numerical terms such as; how safe one feels in their home. In the traditional sense this type of data is not as trusted as quantitative data because of it's seemingly lack of clarity upon a subject. However this data does have it's uses within the human sciences, if it is considered in psychology a reaction to a certain circumstance can be recorded and then interpreted to find the reason behind this reaction e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion both of these types are to an extent useful to the human science. Quantitative data can allow us to foresee the reactions people with conditioned theorems and equations but is limited because the nature of the human sciences doesn't normally allow for this type of data to be recorded. Qualitative data is traditionally less reliable as it seems to be unclear or precise. However within the human sciences qualitative data is able to be interpreted so as to predict the majority of reactions that will take place when humans are placed within a situation. Finally the relevance of these two types of information is solely based upon the ability of the human society to be unique. By Daniel Sanchez. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    COE will increase and will bid at higher prices in an attempt to secure more COEs.

  2. strength and limitations of quantitative and qualitative data

    It is practically impossible to assess or count up the number of "thoughts" one has in a day. William James thought of these "thoughts" as a stream of consciousness. This led to the study of behaviorism using a scientific approach.

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    People will not find this process out for themselves, because textbooks that are accepted as credible in society have already noted the process. Natural sciences appeal to the logic and reasoning aspect of knowledge, which is acceptable to most people because it simply makes sense.

  2. The Human Sciences

    Firstly, just like any other humans, human scientists are prone to commence their search for a conclusion about humankind with prejudices and biases about individuals' and societies' natures. People are more likely to think more highly of a branch of society that they are part of.

  1. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Charis : True, but at the same time scientific psychology is so restrained by the strict research methods which makes it unable to explain knowledge of personality as broadly as novel, thus, making it harder for us to obtain the knowledge.

  2. All knowledge claims should be open to rational criticism. On what grounds and to ...

    Given the condition that participants on the show are required to create personal renditions of various songs; logically speaking then, the judges shouldn't be able to justify their criticism as they themselves may not entirely understand the singer's interpretation. From my experience in the arts, particularly in music, I have received numerous feedbacks about my piano performances from various adjudicators.

  1. Reliability of Sigmund Freud's claims

    The superego represents the higher moral values of society, and those traits required for interacting in society. The id seems to be a collection of animal instincts such as the drive for sex (libido) and the drive for death (thanato).

  2. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    The book states that ?Scientists have unearthed thousands of fossil specimens representing members of the human family?(4). In the world we live in, people are becoming more open minded and accepting of different views including the concept of evolution. Research showing strong evidence in favour of evolution has resulted in popular belief.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work