• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does language help or hinder the way we acquire knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of Knowledge Does language help or hinder the way we acquire knowledge? Language is something that humans have used almost since the beginning. It is combination of sound that is used to communicate between people one of the fundamental parts of a community. It is something that is incredibly important to us. Our language allows us to do many things. We use it to express our thoughts, connect with others and also for our knowledge. In these ways, language makes things a lot easier for us in facilitating our thoughts and helping to develop them as well. In fact, it can be argued that thinking requires having a natural mental language, such as English. We think in this language, and without such a language, much of our thought would make no sense. Therefore much of our knowledge acquisition is mostly based on our language. ...read more.

Middle

Language too, is what allows us to understand the new information that we acquire through language. People gain further knowledge by the variety of techniques they develop from their education. They use their best method to learn and acquire new knowledge. We can then use such methods to gain knowledge acquisition ourselves. Therefore language is both very important and helps us a lot our acquisition of knowledge through education. Books are another way that we use to acquire knowledge. This knowledge can be acquired then passed on and shared with many other people. Even in this way to acquire knowledge we are heavily dependent on our own natural language (to be able to read and understand the information we are given by the book or the text). In this sense, without language, much of what humans have learnt over time could not even be recorded, and therefore our knowledge today would be incredibly limited and we wouldn't be able to pass it to the next generations. ...read more.

Conclusion

So by using our language as a way to gain knowledge, we can actually acquire it only when we know what we are talking about. If for example we somehow end up in the middle of a conference, and we have no idea what they are talking about, we won't be able to understand anything, also because they might use some specific language. When two people are speaking two different languages, and they don't understand each other, both of them won't get the message the other person wants the other to get. In the end they might understand each other, and interpreting what the other person is talking about. The interpretation of another language, or the translation, is never perfectly accurate, and this might affect the knowledge these two people want to get. In the sense they are not changing the message, but it can be interpreted in the wrong way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge a good thing? ...

    It is not only in weaponry where knowledge is dangerous. In the biological case of abortion, the study into how to stop unwanted pregnancies created a method to stop them, and kill a human life. The practice of abortions has been going on since early times, and since then there has been new developments into abortion practices.

  2. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    God is not all Loving It is often seem to people who are not religious that there is no event that would make a religious person admit there was a case for suggesting that 'God does not really love us' (Anthony Flew, 1955).

  1. What might be meant by Nietzche's comment that "rational thought is interpretation according to ...

    one we had reacted previously, if we didn't then we tried to deal with it differently, thinking in which way we think might get us what we want.

  2. Are the WOKS controlled by language?

    Are there logical relations between them which we don't have the language sufficient for? And does language restrict thought? The first problem, restated here, is mutability and unreliability of language. Before we think that language's imprecision is so much a bad thing, let us remember that it is because of

  1. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    Consider a container full of a gas such as air and imagine that it is composed of minuscule elastic spheres bouncing around. It can be assumed that the mechanical behavior of the spheres is similar to the behavior of colliding billiard balls.

  2. TOK essay- Can language be said to hinder thought?

    When labels are used on people, they are called stereotypes. These stereotypes limit our view on people, therefore limiting our thought. A stereotype is an idea or belief (often inaccurate) about what another person is like, based on what group that person belongs to. Stereotypes are a type of prejudice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work