• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does language play roles of equal importance in different Areas of Knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay Question: Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science tells us that the table is mostly empty space. Thus two sources of knowledge generate conflicting results. Can we reconcile such conflicts? Science and Perception have been at each others' throats for generations. Some people have remained loyal to science and natural order while others have been faithful to their senses. However it is often that the people find themselves in a dilemma; trying to believe both at the same time, so the question remains to be answered: can we combine two different viewpoints and believe them both at the same time? There are many people who believe that these two sources of knowledge are compatible. Perception has been subject of speculation by many great thinkers and philosophers. Many have their own definition and understanding of it. However my understanding of it is somehow different, I believe that perception is the recognition and interpretation of sensory stimuli based chiefly on memory, the idea is that you had lived and learnt different things that make your perception; you caught something through old information or experience; meaning that people's perception is subject to change because it is influenced by their experiences and past knowledge of events. ...read more.

Middle

It is thought, according to this view, that it is not perception/senses that correspond with science but it is reasoning. We tend to gather information using our senses however if that information were just to be placed on our observation then obviously it will be false. We saw earlier in class that our eyes aren't the smartest things on earth as they were easily manipulated by optical illusions. Therefore in order for our observations to be true they must not be based on our senses only but also on reasoning. As a critical thinker, reasoning would a major step in understanding our world. However it can be argued that reasoning isn't very accurate as it is dependent on perception! Our reasoning tends to depend on our perception of the world and our bias towards the topic. For example, a Christian examining a scientific event will probably have a different reasoning than an atheist physicist because they both have their own perception which influenced by their experience and beliefs. So in that sense, reason is flawed just like senses are. But it could be argued that even though reason has its limit due to its dependence on culture and education, it should still be more reliable than senses. ...read more.

Conclusion

If only our language was sophisticated enough to allow us to communicate better, then this problem would be non-existent. You see, it's not that 2 areas of knowledge are at conflict with each other only but it is our common sense that is letting us down. This can be applied to the actual problem as well. We think we are seeing something solid by looking at the table because we were told, as a kid, the definition of a solid which seems to match our sensual image of it. However, we weren't told why the objects looked like solids? There is an actual scientific explanation for it but no one told us. It's not the fact that our senses are completely wrong, it has to do with the fact that our senses are acting on a basis of an incomplete perception. Had our perception been different, if we knew why looked at the table and saw a solid object, if only we understood our sensory limitation and if only we comprehended our perceptual bias then such conflict wouldn't occur. Once all that is achieved we will be able to think of a table as a solid object and empty space at the same time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. the roles played by reason and imagination in at least two Areas of Knowledge.

    Without the power of reason in architecture, most buildings would be too aesthetically pleasing for their own good, and would not be able to be used. Even if the building was not supposed to be used, without reason the artist's (architect's)

  2. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    No such sentence has ever been found: for all practical purposes all languages have the same semantic scope. WHORF - he suggested that language determines thoughts Counter claim to Whorf - e.g try on my family Can amount of fluency someone has on one language determine their thought?

  1. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    According to my definition of language, if the author portrayed his ideas and it was misinterpreted, then there was limited communication that occurred. There might have been some form of exchange but the communication was frayed and broken. You could argue then that personal response papers and anything that is an interpretation of another work is therefore not language.

  2. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history.

    to their love of their country, and so is perhaps different to other events associated with suicide. As someone who studies history, I have encountered these events from a British perspective, and given the fact that the British were on opposite sides to the Germans and the Japanese, one is

  1. Rebuttal paper nasa

    JUST TO MAKE THE COMPETITION WITH RUSSIA AND CHINA EASIER SEEMS A LITTLE IMPRACTICAL. In the fiscal year $18.7 billion has been proposed whereas in the same year 2010 $159.7 billion was SPENT. WHILE CANCELING THE "BACK TO MOON PROJECT" DUE TO CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITION HOW COME GOVERNMENT SPENT A HUGE SUM FOR THE WAR?

  2. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    The chemist would probably explain it as a mixture of certain chemicals, while the physicist would perhaps calculate the amount of oil that could be poured into it before it finally sank in a pool of water. Moreover, on one hand where the artist would talk about the dimensions of

  1. Does Language Play Roles of Equal Importance in Different Areas of Knowledge?

    Written language can be observed all throughout history, from The Code of Hammurabi, written in about 1760 BC, to The Articles of Confederation, written in 1777AC, to The African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, written in 1981AC. Along with these important documents of history, there have also been many important speeches and addresses spoken all throughout time.

  2. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history

    Firstly, our premises in deductive reasoning are assumed. How sure are we that all wars are bad? Who can define what is ?bad?? Secondly, this applies to inductive reasoning too. Singapore, for example, introduced conscription for defense purposes and certainly not to wage a war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work