• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the possession of knowledge carry an ethical responsibility?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Ting Yuen Lai ?The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility?. Evaluate this claim. Knowledge is known as information and skills acquired through experience or education, or even the theoretical and practical understanding of the subject. Knowledge is all around us. It can be obtained in an instant, yet may have positive and negative consequences on the person who possesses it and on the environment around him/her. Other times, knowledge may even be hazardous. Either way, the possession of knowledge has a role to play in our society, and pushes us to act. We are often troubled and worried about the course of our actions, and the ethics associated with those actions. Ethics are known to be the fundamental principles or beliefs associated with morally acceptable and morally unacceptable behavior, seen in a person?s eyes. Now according to moral relativism, an area of ethics, our values are determined by the society we grow up in and there are no universal values. Hence, a person?s ethics can have originated from a variety of different sources. An ethical responsibility is known to be our responsibility to act upon our beliefs based on what we consider as ethical. ...read more.


Now according to moral absolutism, certain moral principles should always be followed irrespective of context. In this case, adhering to moral absolutism, Oppenheimer would not be expected to his utilize and abuse his knowledge of the atomic to possess destructive power, despite the fact that America was under attack by the Japanese. This is because he has an obligation to stick to his moral principles, regardless of the situation he is in. Therefore from a moral absolutist standpoint, acting upon his knowledge of science to create the ultimate weapon of mass destruction, as a means of justice and protection, can still be considered unethical. Often scientists are so obstinate in their pursuit of scientific knowledge and ultimately status, that often they can neglect their ?ethical responsibilities?, and in this case, Oppenheimer?s chose power and fame over his ethical responsibility, becoming the ?destroyer of worlds?. Ultimately, it can be questioned whether scientists should have an ethical responsibility in the pursuit of knowledge, or whether the knowledge itself they acquire equips them with an ethical responsibility. Similarly to the role of the scientist, the role of a doctor can be another example of the natural sciences as a way of knowing. ...read more.


Hence, there are often situations where attaining knowledge places the person at an inescapable position, where his/her decisions will inevitably be considered as unethical. A counter claim in the human sciences would involve me witnessing two people holding hands, in which through sense perception, caused me to assume that they were a couple. It was until later that I found out that the male was in fact in a relationship with another female. My knowledge of them holding hands did not hold me at any obligation, as I was oblivious to the full truth and was unaware that the male was cheating on his girlfriend. Hence in this case, knowledge here did not possess any ethical responsibility whatsoever. In conclusion, most often full knowledge to a particular issue does indeed possess an ethical responsibility. Gaining full knowledge immediately involves the person in the situation, and he/she is often judged through his/her actions based on his/her newly attained knowledge. However, only possessing partial knowledge of a certain subject is insufficient to subject one to take ethical actions and decisions, as he/she is unaware of the full situation and shouldn?t be required to ?correct? the ?wrong?. It can almost be said that the person who is oblivious to the whole situation is considered ?innocent?, while the person fully aware must fulfill his/her ethical responsibility to remain ?innocent?. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Examine the ethical issues in vivisection and discuss the extent to which it should ...

    of other species and that human life and happiness ultimately takes precedence over that of animals. Therefore, justifying the act of experimenting on animals. On the other hand, other parties against vivisection argue that animals do have rights and should not be subjected to the brutalities of the experiments as they are still living creatures.

  2. The Possession of Knowledge Carries an Ethical Responsibility (TOK essay)

    Upon the discovery of new knowledge until we decide whether or not we decide to relinquish such information, we receive power through our capability of choice. An example of this that comes to mind stems from personal experience.

  1. The Possession of Knowledge carries an Ethical Responsibility. Evaluate this claim.

    If the suspicion was reported without evidence, my personal reputation and friend?s reputation could be affected, together with our friendship. Meanwhile, some parties insist that it is more ethically responsible for any suspicions to be raised immediately for the sake of academic honesty.

  2. The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility. Evaluate this claim.

    A journalist was able to infiltrate into this press conference and to capture a controversial statement made by Romney. When this footage of Romney was uploaded to the Internet, many people and his potential voters were upset about what he said.

  1. The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility. Evaluate this claim.

    Despite the obvious consequences, humans will continue researching more efficient and effective weapons. Scientist responsibility lies with how their research is used based on who they share their results with. Scientists are ethically bound to prevent destruction based on their research.

  2. The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility. Evaluate this claim.

    Once a person possesses knowledge, it is crucial that they decide what to do with the knowledge. They must ?own? the knowledge in a sense and find a use for the knowledge in order to do what is ethically right.

  1. Abortion: Ethical or Not?

    the futures of adult human beings and are identical with the futures of young children. Since the reason that is sufficient to explain why it is wrong to kill human beings after the time of birth is a reason that also applies to feotuses, it follows that abortion is prima

  2. Tok Essay. Knowledge and Ethical Responsibility

    It is a more realistic than Kantian thought, while being less strict that utilitarianism. An overview of modern ethics is able to be applied to the possession of knowledge. As previously mentioned, the sheer state of being in possession of knowledge does not in and of itself carry ethical responsibilities,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work