• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


1. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss. Moral judgments restrict the tools available in the creation of knowledge in both the arts and natural sciences. As ethical procedures are a variable element, the two areas explored under this concept tend to overlap in some ways. Ethical judgments can be termed as ?the moral principles governing or influencing conduct?[1], leading up to a broader question that is ?What falls under this category of morally correct?? and to what extent can we allow ethics to govern knowledge production? To a certain extent ethical judgments can be considered to be ambiguous and compartmentalizing every situation as right or wrong becomes impractical after a point. For every person, their culture and society defines this particular term differently; the influencing factor continues to be perception that is instrumental in the transformation of a moral judgment into an ethical dilemma conflicting between one?s emotions and reasoning abilities. Is judgment as a whole ethical? The very definition for ethics varies between different cultures and communities; this question in essence restricts man?s ability to explore the realms of knowledge. Do ethics help in the functioning of society or merely place boundaries on the inquisitive human mind? ...read more.


When it comes to areas like Visual Arts the ethical judgments valid in biology or chemistry are not valid in this case, a real life example was an ongoing campaign run by PETA to support animals that are tortured and skinned alive for their fur by having celebrities pose in the nude. These campaigns have come as a shock to a larger part of the society especially in conservative countries like India. Could this be restricting the expression of Art through the medium of photography? When we look at the bigger picture is it that one individual?s exposed body that comes to be the point of focus or the statement the artist intended to make? Understanding the picture on a deeper level provides insight into the artist?s mind, for some this image is merely a means of entertainment but the people that do understand the notion behind it have more of an impact. Knowledge on these cases is getting expanded and conveyed to that part of the population, this is considered ethically wrong so the fact that some part of the people did gain something from this and it would benefit the environment and society as a whole does not hold any value? ...read more.


Ultimately human beings create these terms and with every person that applies this ethical code to his/her situation the personal boundaries change, once again leaving it back to the ambiguity that it started with before. Peter Singer states that ?the basic principle of equality does not require equal or identical treatment; it requires equal consideration.?[5] As variable as the interpretation of ethical judgments may be there is still a basis on which we evaluate our choices, segregate them from right and wrong, categorize them into black and white. When Art is studied in depth the ethical aspect of it never comes to mind initially, all great artists have a different mindset, each artist may have completely contrasting views on many aspects. The term ?tortured artist? has been used end number of times where there is this predefined list of expectations and pressure for being that much superior. This comes from experience and struggle, forms of Art like music and literature convey the individual?s innermost emotions and those with over complicated lives or restrictions by the society help in the enhancement of their work, ethical judgments act as a positive here. So when an artist or poet or writer is judged by the society or limited by what may be considered morally wrong it only makes the work that much stronger. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    (Van de Lagemaat 270-71) The higher the probability of a phenomenon in a large test population, the greater confidence that a theory is widely applicable and therefore more convincing. Additionally, theories in human sciences often attempt to describe or predict a human behavior.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    will never change - i.e. the Ten Commandments. The truth in ethics refers to the pragmatic theory of truth (as does the arts). Because the truth in ethics has a practical use for individuals (i.e. reducing crime in the world)

  1. In Areas of Knowledge Such As the Arts and the Sciences, Do We Learn ...

    followed existing theory to discover new particles without breaking with previous conventions. As Thomas Kuhn said on his outline and study guide, prepared by Professor Frank Pajares, called `The Structure of Scientific Revolutions`, the normal science "is predicated on the assumption that the scientific community knows what the world is like".

  2. "In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn ...

    When we follow knowledge of accepted conventions, we are able to understand clearly the idea behind the scientific theory and relate it to the world today. This relation allows us to improve the world, and use the scientific means for purposes that help humanity.

  1. "The arts deal in the particular, the individual, and the personal. While the sciences ...

    about the divisions between both areas of knowledge, as is reflected in the statement. In exploring the impact these set "rules" of separation between both areas of knowledge have on obscuring them, it is essential to determine that they do certainly have basic differences in their fundamental explanations.

  2. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    Phrenology, however, takes it to such specificity that the proportions of personality correlate with the sizes of brain regions. It also entails that the brain can be divided into 27 different personality areas as opposed to the four lobes established.

  1. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    relative suffered from severe joint pain took it and improved visibly and I too have used homeopathy medicines for my stomach cramps and they seem to have a healing effect and I feel better after taking them. Although this may be due to psychological or the placebo effect I still

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    Although we might believe that we are wholly logical in our judgments, the fact remains that most people do not have the sufficient knowledge to reach their own fair judgments. Although we might believe that we are persuaded merely on a rational level, the truth is we are blinded and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work