• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the strengths and weakness of Reason as a way of knowing?

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the strengths and weakness of Reason as a way of knowing? What is reason? The dictionary says, a statement presented in justification or explanation of a belief or action. I say, reason can be used to uncover truth and validity so we do not make incorrect generalizations or false accusations. And people say a statement that has a proper logical explanation to justify something. Different people would have different opinion. But one thing would be common that is we rely on the logic of Math and Sciences to provide our reasoning, which requires proof and solidification of position in order to make a valid point. Whereas in the past reasoning was influenced by the Church, through Religion and Faith. So we can say that reason is influenced. In maths whenever we are taught any new concept the first thing we ask after hearing that is how can we be so sure about that. ...read more.


And we conclude it's the correct thing. But just because it's the most reasonable way doesn't mean that it's always right. For example, the popular violent genre game GTA IV, scientist suggest that violent games like GTA IV affect a child brain, so we believe it, but many living example defeat this fact that games affect teenagers. The finding has a proper logical explanation but still it's not right. The good thing about reason is that it has provides answer to every question. Some answers are vague but still they help in satisfying the curiosity of knowing. For example, people ask questions about God, does he exist. And the answer is yes he is everywhere. But this has no logic behind it but still people believe it because this answer does not have a logical explanation instead the answer is influenced by emotions and religious beliefs. So we can say that for reason to be true a proper logical explanation is needed otherwise there is no point. ...read more.


So inductive reasoning is only useful for forming ideas about groups of things in real life and not provide proof. Deductive reasoning is the process by which a person makes conclusions based on previously known facts. For example, all eleven graders are clever. Sam's dog is in class 11. According to deductive reasoning Sam's dog is clever but in reality anything like this cannot be deduced. So deductive reasoning depends on the premises it is built on. Both of reasoning are useful in some way or the other. Inductive provides us a hypothesis so that we can further continue with the observations and deductive allows us in forming conclusion. But neither of them works in real life. Reason can lead to knowledge, and it leads to certainty at that, but it only provide how you know it. After knowing it you cannot do anything about it. This were all the other ways of knowing come in, language helps in communicating the knowledge, perception helps in assuming, emotions encourages us to share. Reason alone only justifies but when combined other with other modes-of-knowing, it becomes very powerful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as a way of knowing.

    living things are sacred" would disagree with the conclusion that "animal experimentation is wrong" and consider it unreasonable. Thus, one's own emotions and biases towards any given subject affect the formation of valid conclusions in ethics and we cannot solely rely on reason alone, as it might not produce certain conclusions.

  2. Evaluate the ways in which emotions might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way ...

    Now Anna can do what is morally good and leave George to be with his girlfriend, but then she would experience the emotion called jealousy. Therefore she decides to steal George away from his girlfriend. Without emotions one would not be able to make decisions in everyday life, because every decision has its pros and cons.

  1. In what way does the problem of evil lead to atheism?

    problem of evil may lead us to suggest, then he is, at least in this sense, morally imperfect. Supporters of this view argue that, if this so, then God is not a being worth of worship, in fact he is not worthy of the title "God".

  2. Evaluate the ways in which emotion might enhance and/or undermine reason as a way ...

    He called this "Negative Capability". He believed that he could connect this consciousness and emotion directly to the universe, this way he is able to realize things instantly without the need to reason; as a result, gaining knowledge faster. For that reason, emotions can also make things become clearer.

  1. Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses of Reason as a Way of Knowing.

    In a discussion we try to persuade the other person of our argument by leading them through the same steps we underwent when we reached it. However, the part where the statements are interpreted is subjective and this is what makes convincing the other person of our argument a challenge.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as a way of knowing.

    Reason is the one means of knowing. It can "definite" knowledge (mysticism cannot). Reason is unerring, It is the only method to attempt that we know. Faith and reason have each been considered to be sources of justification for belief.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as a way of knowing. ...

    in the infinite sequence of statements is true, then so is the next one. (Problem of induction. 2012, May 8) One of the example shown clearly the the Mathematical spectrum is the arithmetic progression. Arithmetic progression is sequences of number that share the same different between each consecutive term.

  2. Is it possible to justify the different ways of knowing?

    Reason should be placed at the top of the hierarchy when it comes to giving us more accurate and reliable knowledge as compared to sense perception because it involves conscious and logical processing, thinking and reflection when evaluating a knowledge claim.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work