• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the ways in which emotion may enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way of knowing.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TOK Essay Evaluate the ways in which emotion may enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way of knowing. To begin with, there are four ways by which a person can obtain knowledge which are Emotion, Reason, Perception and Language. Perception is defined in psychology as the process of interpreting, acquiring, selecting and organizing sensory information. Language is the way by which people obtain information by communicating with each other either by using patterns of sound and/or hand gesture symbols. Moreover, Reason is known in philosophy as the ability of the human mind to form and operate on concepts in abstraction, in varied accordance with rationality and knowledge. Furthermore, Emotion is defined by the scientist Edward O. Wilson as the modification of neutral activity that animates and focuses mental activity. Despite the fact that each way of knowing is distinctly different from the others, they sometimes have huge impact on one another and help to clarify each other. ...read more.

Middle

This is an example of how emotions enhance reason as a way of knowledge. Emotions are classified into four different types which are Instinctive Emotions, such as anger and love, Social emotions such as guilt and shame, Inward-Looking emotions such as fear, where we are 'drawn into ourselves' and Outward- Looking emotions, such as wonder, where we are drawn 'out of ourselves'. The problem of classification is that it is never neutral. Emotions are bound up with our bodies - they have a visceral component. When we are angry or frightened, for example, our heart thumps, our breathing speeds up and adrenaline releases fuel from the liver. We would conclude that those reactions are a result of our inward emotions, and emotions cause changes in our body. However, one philosopher called William James suggest that emotions are purely and simply our experience of a bodily reaction to an event. However, experiments have shown that there is more to emotion than response to bodily effects. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, we will not be happy if someone dear to our hearts suddenly dies, or during an argument with someone, or when Oman's national football team loses the Gulf Cup. There has to be a reasoned judgment before we 'know' what emotion to feel. We need the input of our senses so that the reasoning can take place. In addition, we cannot feel an emotion about something if we don't know anything about it. Finally, it appears that emotion we experience comes after empirical data has been processed rationally. We might think that emotion is derivative from these two primary ways of knowing. I can know anything about anything, but I can only feel about things/people that have some personal impact on me. Last but no least, Emotions are vital characteristics of any human being engaged in a physical world which is indifferent to human needs. With no emotions there can be no goals, and no being-in-the-world, as some philosophers have called it. Emotions are considered by many philosophers as the central aspect of human life. Class; - 2nd Secondary / IB first year ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent do you think reason is an objective, reliable way of knowing? ...

    Hence language becomes a problem when there is no precise meaning to various terms. The language barrier in reasoning could be classified as an unreliable way of knowing because of its controversial nature. Furthermore, Ones emotion and personal experience could influence their reasoning in various situations and this could be

  2. Evaluate the ways in which emotion might enhance and/or undermine reason as a way ...

    He called this "Negative Capability". He believed that he could connect this consciousness and emotion directly to the universe, this way he is able to realize things instantly without the need to reason; as a result, gaining knowledge faster. For that reason, emotions can also make things become clearer.

  1. Evaluate the ways in which emotion might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way ...

    A scream of fear can cause a crowd to panic; a smile can sometimes defuse the most dangerous of situations and create instant bonding among strangers. Yet, at times our emotions can get out of control and defeat our best interests.

  2. Evaluate the ways in which emotions might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way ...

    and loud children, and does not look at the well mannered and the quiet ones. The old man then uses fallacious reasoning, where he makes hasty generalizations from his own limited experience. Then the old man uses emotive language, where he expresses his emotions towards the children.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as a way of knowing

    of knowing, however, I would like to emphasize that language is the basis of emotion, reason and perception. People may say that we can infer happiness from a smile and sadness from frown; however, as mentioned earlier, language controlled emotions.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as a way of knowing.

    Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a fallacy when a person may tend to reason and may just confuse the correlation. Levitt and Dubner analyzed the drop in crime rate in US in their book 'Freakonomics'. When crime rate unexpectedly fell in 2000s, the experts came up with the logical

  1. Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses of Reason as a Way of Knowing.

    In this setting the application of reason is quite limited because only the first statement is completely objective; the arguments depend on the interpretation of each person. Another way of approaching this is by widening the definition of reason. In society, the parameters of reason are widened to envelop part of the interpreting process when morals and values become fixed.

  2. TOK: What are the effects of biased language and unsound reasoning on history?

    Doesn?t the beauty lie in the eyes of the beholder? Doesn?t all look yellow to the jaundiced eye? We read history so that the mistakes of the past may not be repeated in the future. But how can we learn when some of the history is fabricated and highly opinionated?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work