• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evidence. One of the main differences between I am certain and it is certain can be seen through the ways in which these statements can be justified. I am certain is personal knowledge - someones opinion.

Extracts from this document...


The pronoun implemented at the beginning of each of these 'certainty phrases', subtly - but simultaneously dramatically - alters its global perception. 'It' is a global pronoun - used and applied on a large scale to reassure many of its followers. 'I' is miniscule in comparison; it's all about me - or you - and no one else.?? One of the main differences between 'I am certain' and 'it is certain' can be seen through the ways in which these statements can be justified. 'I am certain' is 'personal' knowledge - someone's opinion. It may be justified by knowledge, but will usually be based upon conviction- due to culture, faith, and introspection - such as empathy and conscience, as well as acquaintance and practice. Emotion is the biggest justification for 'I am certain', as this can be sufficiently powerful to overcome logic. Conversely, it could be argued that in some cases, personal experience is the only certainty, thus taking on the appearance of 'it is certain'. When we personally experience something - even though its meaning can be misinterpreted - that experience is real, and so personal conviction and certainty is created. The difficulty comes however, when we take one personal experience and try to generalise from it. ...read more.


With capital punishment, it cannot be pronounced that 'it is certain' that someone guilty of murder should be put to death, as there is a lack of actual proof that this is morally right - no empirical knowledge or universal logic can be placed upon this statement to make it certain, although it could, in theory, be shown that capital punishment acted as a deterrent and so, on utilitarian grounds, saved more lives than it took. In courts, the jury are asked to prove 'beyond reasonable doubt' that the accused is guilty. Thus, even if each member of the jury is personally certain that the defendant is guilty, they do not need to prove that it is certain - just beyond reasonable doubt, which is a hazy line of precision. Yet, the very implementation of laws that condemn criminals is placing a field of universal certainty around such ethical topics. In the Netherlands, assisted suicide has been legalised, yet in England such practices remain illegal. This presents the dilemma of varying universal certainty. British law is pronouncing a certainty of the immorality of assisted euthanasia - certain to all British citizens through law, yet in the Netherlands the certainty created by a law is that assisted euthanasia is not wrong. ...read more.


An individual can justify knowledge that they believe in through passionate conviction - particularly in ethics where there is no 'truth' - without it being proved true, or even being true. The problem comes when trying to use my personal passionate conviction, and my emotions, to justify knowledge to others. Passionate conviction can be enough to justify knowledge for an individual, but not for a universal statement. In order for a universal truth, the knowledge has to be certain - and so must be reliant upon impersonal propositional knowledge such as empirical evidence, deductive logic in maths or inductively derived scientific knowledge. To justify knowledge in order to be able to state 'it is certain', evidence or authority is needed.?? I believe that passionate conviction is sufficient to justify an individual's knowledge, or even public knowledge if the reliability of the source of passionate conviction is considered great enough. 'I am certain' differs from 'it is certain' as it is a personal conviction that changes with an individual - it is affected by changing realities. 'It is certain' is exempt from this however. Intriguingly, over time, insight, perception and creative advance help to alter 'I am certain' to 'it is certain' status in certain areas of knowledge such as History. However this would never occur in Art or Religion, as their bases are largely subjective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Is there any knowledge in the world which is so certain than no reasonable ...

    There are cases in which to reach a conclusion using axioms, meaning using premises as certain prepositions. Therefore the conclusion looses credibility making it not certain and a man could doubt it. A classic example is Euclid's Axiom of Parallels: "taking a straight line and a point outside the line,

  2. If facts themselves never prove or disprove anything, what else is involved in the ...

    objective observer my word might not satisfy the demands of accepted standards of justification. Consider now a fact from History. Julius Caesar died in 44 BCE (Lendering, 2006). If this is a fact, and for arguments sake, let us assume it is, then this fact alone (perhaps together with a little logical reasoning)

  1. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    established and we could accept this knowledge as a part of our lives. For example, a historian may want to affirm if the cold war started in the 1940s. He may gather a group of primary sources-survivors of the cold war or their family members-and analyze the piece of information.

  2. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    The few pieces of art work the artist creates can essentially be their ticket to fame, if it turns our really popular to the people viewing it. The artist can gain more popularity and fame once his or her art becomes famous.

  1. People Need To Believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events

    In a way, both of these are ways to avoid chaos and our need for order. Planning our life and thinking a step ahead, which would be hard with no direction or history, seems to be a need we have which without we would not last long in this life.

  2. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    Therefore, it is highly unlikely that he is affected by his passionate conviction. Also, from the statement we can expect that this economist has done some research on the data of unemployment and inflation rate, which can be justified by mathematical means.

  1. With references to two areas of knowledge discuss the way in which shared knowledge ...

    However, this implication forms the basis of my counter-claim, my previous argument having been grounded by the assumption that historians cannot detach themselves from the times. If that assumption results in the implication of stagnation then it cannot entirely be true due to the numerous schools of thought: orthodox, revisionist, post-revisionist and so on and so forth.

  2. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    We know that if we choose to find the evidence ourselves, it is well within reach and we accept it. The knowledge claim that naturally follows is that assertions that are proved by the collective wisdom of others are obviously just as valuable to us.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work