• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the ways empirical evidence should be used to make progress in different areas of knowledge

Extracts from this document...


Examine the ways empirical evidence should be used to make progress in different areas of knowledge. This essay will be investigating the ways in which empirical evidence, obtained from the empirical (or scientific) method, can be used in two different areas of knowledge. The empirical method is an elaborate method which, greatly simplified, is a scientific experiment. The areas that I have chosen to compare concerning the use of empirical evidence are the natural sciences and the human sciences where the former is much more based around empirical evidence for reasons that I will be exploring. It is interesting to note that both include the word "sciences" within their titles. Today, empirical evidence is used mainly in the areas in the knowledge of natural sciences. It is explored in academic subjects such as biology, chemistry and physics. The empirical, or scientific, method uses the following steps: 1) Define the question 2) Gather information and resources (observe) 3) Form hypothesis 4) Perform experiment and collect data 5) Analyze data 6) Interpret data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis 7) Publish results 8) Retest (frequently done by other scientists) 1 Evidently, the scientific method, the means by which empirical evidence is obtained, is a reliable and reviewed method that, if respected, allows a reliable means to conduct experiments. ...read more.


Help from one or more governments is often needed. Seeing as the empirical method seems to work well for natural sciences, why is it not used for human sciences such as geography, history and psychology, the latter being the area of knowledge that I will be using to compare with natural sciences whilst investigating the uses of empirical evidence in each of these areas? As I will explain, there are a limited number of cases where it has in fact been used within the area of human sciences. We must first ask ourselves why empirical evidence is, more often than not, avoided when it comes to investigating various areas of human sciences? Firstly, as I explained earlier on, the empirical method uses reasoning and perception as ways of knowing. The human sciences are all about the ways of knowing that are much dependant on human behaviour - language and, in particular, emotion. Psychology relies entirely on emotion. Secondly, there is the issue of being able to reproduce the circumstances and conditions that are to be experimented. In history, it would be absurd and impossible to recreate early twentieth century Europe to investigate the causes of the First World War. This is simply not feasible. ...read more.


This raises the question as to whether these experiments really need to be carried out or whether they should even be allowed to be carried out, yet again, relating back to the ethical issues. This experiment also asks the question whether Dr Watson allowed his emotions to take over his reasoning to form this conclusion. History and geography are examples where a certain amount of empirical evidence is used because, despite the fact that the scientific method is not used, they use a lot of so-called facts and evidence. And then, using this, historians put forwards opinions and arguments using the facts and evidence they have collected as back-up. This is an example where perception and language are used as reasoning to back up an idea that has come from emotion and hence using all the areas of knowing. To conclude, it is possible to use the empirical evidence in some cases in both the natural and human sciences. Having said that, the empirical method is much more widely used in the natural sciences because it uses perception and reasoning as ways of knowing and these are futile in the realms of human sciences such as psychology. The human sciences can also use a certain amount of empirical evidence but is hard to use the empirical method when emotions and language play a big part. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Which provides us with a more reliable vision of the world: rational or empirical ...

    More experiences give us more knowledge. And these experiences come from our senses. As any other living being, humans react according to the environment. The experience that we have gained can make us react in different ways. This is something favourable because we can link situations with previous experiences and we can take better decisions.

  2. To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas ...

    This brings up my first knowledge issue, to what extent does the presence or lack of physical evidence in a knowledge area affect its validity? The title of this essay and this question in particular relates to my studies, and I found an answer within a personal example.

  1. Tok essay 2009

    observar� diferentes cosas en el objeto, lo analizar� de forma diferente y llegar� a una conclusi�n relativa a la del otro sujeto. Esto define claramente que las observaciones de cada sujeto sobre un mismo objeto sean relativas, var�en. Es decir que se da a conocer un relativismo.

  2. Does language play roles of equal importance in different Areas of Knowledge?

    and rest of it returned to earth(ashes), therefore basing his observation on his senses and perception he believed in the 4 classical elements. So here we see that perception and science are related. However many argue that this way of thinking isn't scientific at all, because all Aristotle's thoughts were only based on his observation (no valid data)

  1. TOK Evidence

    I rationalized about what I had to do instead of letting my anger and distress cloud my judgment.I do not let my feelings muddle my thoughts because I can isolate the two ways of knowing of reason and emotion when needed.

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    Evidence requires you to prove to the other parties that your claim is a justified true belief.

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    This appears to be in disagreement with the aforementioned theory that government involvement in the economy can be beneficial. (The Keynes-Hayek Showdown) These two economic philosophies each have merits as well as flaws. However, these strongly supported and clashing views are a central cause of disagreement among economists to this day.

  2. Discuss some of the ways in which statistics can be used or misused in ...

    Basics operations like addition and its supplements are universal and this phenomenon has perpetuated into complex operators such as variance and standard deviation that are used in the calculation of statistics. However, in statistics, the manipulation of numbers leaves room for human intervention.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work