• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of knowledge?

Extracts from this document...


For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of knowledge? In today's world, scientific facts and discoveries seem to be the driving force behind our actions and decisions in life. My mother chooses to buy a particular brand of washing detergent over another as the package tells her that the detergent is "scientifically proven" to remove stains more effectively. My father buys Omega-3 eggs for our household because food scientists from Canada recently published a research article about the health benefits of omega-3 fatty acids. Thousands of people fly across the globe everyday in airplanes and cars due to the advancements of physics. With ever increasing scientific breakthroughs we as knowers need to think about whether a claim backed up scientific evidence is necessarily "true" and whether science provides better explanations and deeper understanding of the world compared to other areas of knowledge. In this essay I will be considering the natural sciences as opposed to human sciences. The knowledge issues I will be covering include inductive logic in the natural sciences, the evolutionary nature of science and appreciation and understanding of different areas of knowledge. Logic and reasoning is often regarded as a more consistent and credible way of obtaining new understanding of a subject matter compared to emotion and perception. ...read more.


No matter how many observations are made on the freezing temperature of water at sea level, the next sample of water that freezes merely adds to the series of observations. It is not certain, regardless of the number of observations that water always freezes at 0�C at sea level. To be absolutely certain, it must be known that the law of nature is immutable. These observations do not establish the validity of inductive reasoning, except inductively. In other words observations that inductive reasoning has worked in the past do not ensure that it will always work. As a knower, this problem leads me to question the understandings I obtain through science. If scientific theories are discovered inductively then surely science cannot "prove" an idea, but can only disprove ideas through new discoveries. Science operates on the assumption that a particular scientific understanding is "true" until proven otherwise. The basis of the scientific method is that if an idea conflicts with what happens in nature then the idea must be changed or built upon. Therefore, though scientific advancements have greatly benefited mankind for many centuries I do not agree with the belief of some people's that the understanding provided by the natural sciences is superior to the other forms of "knowledge" we can obtain from the various other areas of knowledge. ...read more.


However 400 years later pop and R&B music are more favored among today's generation. The introduction of this new age music does not in any way falsify baroque music, or prove it to be "invalid" in the understanding of music as an art form. There is a greater room for opinions and two clashing ideas can exist simultaneously and appeal to different people. This is not the case in the natural sciences, so should the "knowledge" we obtain through the natural sciences be placed of greater importance? I think that the most valuable form of understanding is one that is subjected to my own personal inner beliefs and values. Subjective ideas that could not be falsified, such as the understanding of the love my family has for me, my favorite food, music I enjoy and people whose company I value. Such ideas are unique to my own ways of knowing, my own perceptions and emotions. In conclusion I think the view that science is the superlative form of understanding involves both a misunderstanding of science as a source of "fact" and "truth" and a misunderstanding of personal conviction when it comes to the different areas of knowledge. However we cannot overlook the importance of science in the world today though we should think about to what extend does science provide assurance to what we think we understand about our world today. ?? ?? ?? ?? Genna Gan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    is nobody to see/hear/taste them since changes can be observed (If you leave a burning paper and come later, it will be burnt) The tables in the classroom - Do tables dance when nobody is around? It is improbable for such a thing to exist, therefore it is considered false, since it is impossible to prove.

  2. The Provisional Nature of Science

    Many times in the course of our history, scientific laws and theories were disproved or changed. For example, there was a cubical atom theory less then one hundred years ago, and it stated that all atoms had a shape of a cube.

  1. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    This works the same way for movie actors, as once they become famous, they do not stop acting in films; they keep appearing in new ones to keep their reputation up to please the audience. Hence I believe that the commercial success of an artist does play somewhat of an

  2. Pseudo-science or science

    Furthermore, in religion itself, there are many theories that are not proven but believed, such as the creation of the world. It is stated, in almost all of the religion, that a higher being called "God" created the world, but is this theory proven?

  1. That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow. Consider knowledge issues ...

    One factor that can affect the temperature is the number of people present in the room. If one hand selective observation might limit us of the facts that would lead to discovery of new knowledge on the other hand selective observation allows gathering down facts that ultimately relate to the experiment that is being performed.

  2. Drori shows us how some preconceptions about natural science that seem to be logical, ...

    Children use their sense perception to formulate mind models of how certain things work in the world. It is up to teachers to either affirm or correct us, but according to Drori, they must work with the ideas that children have to begin with, otherwise it?s like teaching nonsense to a child.

  1. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    For example, Karl mentioned Marx, Freud and Adler in his work ?conjectures and refutations?. He regarded them all as pseudo-science because they have apparent ?explanatory power?. As ?A Marxist could not open a newspaper without finding on every page confirming evidence for his interpretation of history? and ?the Freudian analysts

  2. What are good reasons and bad reasons for funding scientific research ? Refer ...

    For example, even though 8% of Africa's population is infected by HIV, there is very little advancement in trying to find a cure or at least drugs to alleviate the symptoms of the disease. This is because there would be no profit from such research since africa is a poor continent and cannot pay for such medication.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work