• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB - Theory of Knowledge - Essay Munich International School By: Pooja Pandey IB Year 2 - May 2010 Candidate Number: 00169 - 056 Word Count: 1587 Date: 25 January 2010 Supervisor: Mr. Joshi How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true? Truth is relative, absolute, objective, subjective etc, many great philosophers have tried to define truth like Plato with his correspondence theory. This theory states that true beliefs and true statements usually correspond to reality, this a very traditional model which was popular with Plato. Since, there are so many definitions and theories of truth, there isn't really a real definition for truth but all these theories are correct because they cannot be proven wrong. However, we all know that truth exists, and it can be explained through the many different ways of knowing which are: emotion, reason, perception and language which are used by us in our day to day lives. However, there is a difference between believing something is true like religion which changes from person to person and it being true in real life such as facts like math; I have divided truth into two main parts: subjective and objective. ...read more.

Middle

I am angry at everyone who passes by even if I don�t know them. But, once I have had something to eat suddenly everyone is alright, I am not angry at the waiter anymore or the cook. This is because at that time and situation, it was emotionally true which a type of subjective truth and changes with time. This is an example of when believing something is true doesn�t always make it true. There are several emotions that can be used throughout such as happiness, for me, "paneer" an Indian dish makes me happy because it is not that commonly found in Germany. But maybe for another person who dislikes Paneer might not feel the same way I do when I order Paneer, they might feel quite the opposite. This shows that emotions are not a very reliable way of knowing as they change for every person and what I might feel might not be the same for the next person. These are usually very varied among people and change consistently which makes it unreliable, also it deals with personal and private experience of oneself which makes it hard to communicate this knowledge. Reason mainly uses of logic and deduction to confirm the truth. Induction is moving from a set of specific facts to a general conclusion, these facts could be from your history or perception, only a very small percentage of reasoning is done using induction. ...read more.

Conclusion

The term "personally opposed" could be interpreted in several ways, it could mean that the act is wrong otherwise why else would they oppose it however the terminology used in that is statement is not based on personal convictions like " i dislike". By the language used, we can see how double speak may twist our version of what we think is right or true. Language can be complex because it changes on the context of how it is used. Anna Brownwell Jameson, a British writer said, 6" Accuracy of language is one of the bulwarks of truth" This quote shows that language is open to our perception which is why perception and language are used together. No matter how accurate language you use, it will still be interpreted in different ways by different people which can change the way truth is known. It seems as though truth could be said as an accumulation of all the ways of knowing because using only 1 or 2 would give a biased view of the truth which is why these different ways of knowing help in differentiating between the objective truth and subjective or what is believed to be true and what is actually true. The prime examples are in religion and science, as religion is believed to be true by people while science is a worldwide truth like facts. Overall, the ways of knowing if used together will help us know the difference between truths. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does ...

    I probably dance to the rhythm since I have a more innate sense of rhythm, which enables me to learn how to dance by following the rhythm. However, dancers that dance systematically to the rhythm are reasoning, using wissen-knowledge17. To be a great dancer there needs to be a combination between following ones feelings and dancing to the rhythm.

  2. How can different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is ...

    So we arrive at the conclusion that Facts are the bases for judging what is right and what is wrong. Since facts make up knowledge, knowledge can also be used to define the clear cut between the true and wrong beliefs. But sometimes we receive wrong facts through the media.

  1. When mathematicians, historians and scientists say that they have explained something are they using ...

    Experiments therefore can become very complex and rely on the control of fine details. A convention then used, where the variables can not be controlled, is to do as many of the same experiment as possible, statistically calculating the possible margin of error ( another mathematical process), which if small enough, the results will be accepted as "true".

  2. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    However, throughout the scientific process we must factor in the emotions involved, whereby scientists feel the need to approve rather than disprove their own hypothesis as a result of emotional attachment to their work. The strength of this attachment is to such an extent that they refute any falsification of their hypothesis, causing them to disbelieve such information.

  1. "All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language." What does this ...

    Take waves for example. Not the waves that surfers surf on, or even waves of ripples on water. Not sound waves or even light waves. Let's take quantum probability waves. A very abstract concept, surely. But we can clearly see that we have named it a wave because it has similar properties to the normal waves we see and experience.

  2. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    and classify it as knowledge however it might only be their opinion.3 If we experience something for ourselves either by sight, sound, touch or smell then we necessarily tend to claim it as the truth. However this type of evidence cannot be applied to all types of knowledge.

  1. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    The means by which they intended to achieve this aim were both quite different: (?Aristotle believed that everything in the world could be understood through careful observation. He believed that knowledge could only be obtained through experience. Aristotle also supported the idea that the earth was constantly changing.

  2. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that ...

    However in reasoning one has to consider the implication that logical fallacies influence the way we reason. Inductive reasoning often leads to hasty generalizations and confirmation bias, where one remembers only what they want to remember. As human beings we tend to follow the fallacy Ag ignorantiam whereby we claim

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work