• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How can we recognise when we have made progress in the search for knowledge? Consider two contrasting areas of knowledge.

Extracts from this document...


"Josip Broz - Tito" High School International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme Skopje, Macedonia TOK ESSAY How can we recognise when we have made progress in the search for knowledge? Consider two contrasting areas of knowledge. Candidate name: Number of words: Darja Stoeva 1250 Candidate number: D000897-013 As any decent philosopher will tell you, knowledge is a tricky thing to define. There is an entire branch called epistemology, dedicated to determining what knowledge is and what is knowable, if anything. For the purposes of this essay, let us assume that there is a body of truths that are absolutely knowable, the material world around us being the primary source and depository of truths that is available to human experience. If we take for granted that we can only know what we experience and that what is outside the scope of our experience is outside the scope of our reasoning ability, then it logically follows that seeking out new experiences leads to the increasing of our font of knowledge as a civilization. The principle that motivates humans in groups to seek knowledge is the maximization of pleasure and the minimization of pain and suffering. It is this principle that led people to invent, explore and expand, eventually building the most advanced colony of organisms that ever was in the history of this planet. ...read more.


The natural sciences rest on the realization that the universe rests upon certain fundamental and unchangeable laws that govern the way in which it functions. New laws can be derived from previous ones, old ones refuted or the knowledge of them improved by the discovery of new ones. Natural sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, all view the world as fundamentally measurable, describable, quantifiable and knowable. They operate under the assumption that all of existence is a vastly complex system with many subsystems that form the areas of interest of the separate sciences. The progress in the search for knowledge in any of these areas can be easily observed and proven. Physics, which started as a speculative branch of philosophy concerning the nature of the universe, has evolved into an incredibly precise and exact science which deftly describes the laws that govern the physical world. It has analyzed its structure from the smallest particle in particle physics, to the largest galaxy in astrophysics. It has taken upon itself the marvellous task of learning how the mechanism of God's clock functions, leading to many incredible technological discoveries, the most impressive and famous of which is the atom bomb. ...read more.


The second one is objectivist and also claims that it is an absolute value, but a value that depends on general human experience. The third approach, the relativist one, asserts that art is not an absolute value, but rather depends on, and varies with the experience of individual humans. The relativist approach doesn't allow us to appraise any objective kind of progress and therefore we will take the former two in attempting to prove that progress in art has occurred. The humble beginnings of human artistic striving can be observed in cave paintings, unsophisticated as they are, nevertheless showing a powerful motivation in Man to create and document his everyday life, believing in the symbolic power of these representations. Through the various subsequent ages, art is seen to rise and fall in quality with the degree of progress or decadence evident in the respective civilizations, even going so far as going hand in hand with scientific, cultural and territorial expansion. I believe that knowledge-seeking is one of the most fundamental qualities of mankind, regardless of the area in question and that progress here can be undoubtedly observed, and while absolute knowledge of the universe will probably never be attained, it is even more glorious a realization that we will forever have something towards which to strive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Let us take history as an area of knowledge for example. Today's events are tomorrow's history, thus if this very day was ever mentioned in history books, nobody but nobody can ever tell me what I was doing as they are not authorized to say so.

  2. Is knowledge in mathematics and other Areas of Knowledge dependent on culture to the ...

    As a universal language anyone should be able to meet a random person and explain a calculus question numerically without a problem except for terms that are not numerical values. Occasionally, my mom helps me with my math homework and sometimes she has difficulty explaining a concept to me because

  1. How can we know when we have made progress in the search of knowledge?

    They would have to wrap the bandage tighter and tighter everyday for up to two years. In other countries around the world, they would find this practice to be unethical and wrong, but in Asia, they believed that a woman with small feet were more likely to get married.

  2. TOK summer assignment - Art Questions. Experiencing art, artists reputations and "what is ...

    If some of the contemporary art, for example the two rocks or the line of bricks were seen in a smaller, personal exhibit, people would not view the art the same way due to the unreliability of the art. People know that the curators who choose the art do it

  1. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    We do not rely as heavily on those opinions as we do in Natural Sciences where most of the times, there is no way of gathering evidence and experience at all than from experts of those fields. When we look at the field of human sciences, we have subjects like

  2. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    of natural sciences to project artistic ideas into concrete representations yet encourage in depth artistic thinking. The influence of new technology aid in today?s fast paced lifestyle. People have implanted the definition of art to be aesthetically beautiful and transparent in its meaning; if the message is not clearly articulated, it wouldn?t be considered art.

  1. TOK Essay - Can we trust reason in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider 2 ...

    Famous Deontologist Immanuel Kant, maintained that one?s ethics should purely be based on reason and not on human inclinations, emotions and consequences of one?s actions. He argued that Man is the only living being with a propensity towards reasoned thought and action, and thus should use such a faculty to determine one?s moral code.

  2. "That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    What were the factors that led to the concretion of such knowledge in the human brains? No doubt, it was the amateur?s magazine articles, the rumors taking a powerful stance, the unsound reason and the biased emotions! People started taking the local concoctions to overcome this disease.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work