• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How certain can we be in the natural sciences?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Ashley Kabugo How certain can we be in the Natural Sciences? We use science everyday to explain certain things about the world that surrounds us. These experiments however depend on us as humans as we are the ones that must observe and gather the results from our own observations. The collection of results does depend on human perception and as humans we are bound to make mistakes, or interpret the results in an incorrect way. So if this is the case it is hard to say we can really trust the natural sciences. To begin with, most of our scientific knowledge in the past was based on theory. People used to believe that earth was flat, or that the sun revolved around the earth. ...read more.


To get results, we depend on our senses. Even if we do record the right things and the right results, we can?t be sure that what our senses tell us are accurate. You may need to use a variety of senses to determine something, but your senses also depend on our perception. For example if you were conducting an experiment whereby you had to time something, your reaction time is going to be slower. There is little chance that you will start the timer at the exact time that you need. The reaction time would affect the accuracy of the experiment, so how can we be certain of it? While conducting such experiments we mostly depend on our sight. While our eyes are accurate for day to day things such as seeing where we are going, what we are doing and so on, we do not have microscopic vision. ...read more.


The earth really is round, there are pictures that can prove it. So this is a reason why we trust the natural sciences. Also, it is the only way we have that can really explain the way the earth is. Sciences have helped as discover so much as human beings, and with this discovery come the ability to adapt and grow in order to survive. Life has been greatly improved by science, even lengthened as scientist find cures for diseases. This is also evidence of how on more than one occasion theories were proven right. In conclusion, while there are several things that may still be based on theory that we cannot prove entirely, sciences have helped us in so many ways and everything did start out as a theory, so it really shows how far we have come. I think we can trust natural sciences, not for everything, but most of the time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    The individual behavior is unique to our experiences and personality - not all humans act the same way when put under the same circumstances. It is therefore not possible to generalize a theory that applies to all individuals, as it is in the case for the natural sciences where the theory could be applied to different occurring natural phenomenon.

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    up the sky and notice how the Sun, Moon, Planets and Stars move across the sky, it's obvious that everything is moving around. Still, many years had to pass to completely convince people about things that now look basic, e.g.

  1. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    Yet it is impossible to perfectly imitate one's thinking. Therefore logically passionate conviction itself can never be sufficient to justify knowledge. This can be further explained with the use of an example. Passionate conviction can come from a scientist (passionate in succeed in his field), and conviction is more likely

  2. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    Annie is a Cactus. So,Annie needs lots of water. In this case we know that Cactuses don`t need lots of water,but the argument at the end is valid. * Science method states that no matter how many particular instances of a phenomenon correspond to the general rule,we can never be

  1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and ...

    This is an attempt to disagree with their own findings, in an effort to find any issues that they could fix to make their findings more accurate. Once they have done this, they must release their findings to the rest of the scientific community.

  2. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in natural and ...

    Everyone considers his or her language superior. I am no authority against the Nobel laureate but given my experience, observation and reason I think, ?By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth.? Nor do I agree with the words of the business magnate and the founder of the British department store Selfridges, ?that the

  1. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    Results should produce evidence that can be repeated. The test to see if distilled water boils at 100° at sea level should be able to be repeated numerous times and produce the desired results. This theory that ‘Distilled water boils at 100 degrees Celsius’ can be proved factually correct irrespective of location of test, nationality of scientist, brand of measuring instrument etc.

  2. How certain can we be in the Natural Sciences?

    As humans study about the Natural Sciences, there are numerous limitations to their studies, which they eventually sum up as one major fact. For instance, the findings done by humans are limited by their senses in a way that if a particular thing is being measured, one?s sense of sight might interfere with the judgment of the issue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work