• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How certain can we be in the Natural Sciences?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Sabah TasnimIB22/9/12 How certain can we be in the Natural Sciences? Natural Sciences are ideally defined as branches of science that seek to expose the rules and laws that govern the natural world by using scientific methods. In addition, Natural sciences can also be referred to as the knowledge of processes that occur and are observable in nature, as distinguishable from abstract or human sciences. They are mainly used to understand how the world and universe around us works. There are five main branches, which include: Chemistry, Biology, Astronomy, Earth Science and Physics. Within each of these branches, are numerous further specializations, namely: agrobiology, biochemistry, biometry, electrobiology, microbiology, radiobiology and so on. Since Natural Sciences are defined as the study of different aspects in the world, in terms of how they work and how they are related, there are various issues that create doubts in people?s minds and others that are left unanswered because the way they are is the way they will be. ...read more.

Middle

These instruments can change the meaning of a particular scientific theory by anything as small as 0.1%, for example if a particular molecule is being measured in Chemistry, by its molecular mass or weight, the properties of the molecule can be affected of the tools used to measure it are inaccurate and in the same way, it is not reasonable to be entirely dependable on technology as they have their own form of errors associated, henceforth, people tend to use their senses, especially vision. In most cases, scientists use both their senses and other tools for research and this can cause further errors if not treated properly because there are multiple sources of errors that are unknowingly dealt with. Furthermore, there are various scientific methods that affect the reliability of Natural Sciences and these again are influenced by humans. There is a certain scientific method known as ?falsificationism,? which is associated by the name ?Karl Popper?, whereby he suggests that scientists do not begin by making scientific observations, but they begin with an informed theory based on previous ones which enables them to formulate a hypothesis. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, as Natural Sciences are ?natural,? there is a lot of hope that doubts cannot easily occur as science is always around us. In the same way, Natural Sciences can be hypothesized; being proven by further evidence and the result is expected which is acquired by the use of formulae, experiments and data to be proved. On the whole, the certainty in natural sciences depends on numerous factors and aspects. However, as this is the twenty first century, it is a lot easier for one to be certain in the Natural sciences as the technological advancement has drastically eased research and finding in the Natural Sciences, which makes it reliable for the world. On the other hand, there might be some cases whereby it is not entirely possible for us, humans, to be certain in Natural sciences because most of the aspects in science are taken one step further by us and therefore there might be a lot of chances for errors which leads to various issues of whether Natural sciences are reliable or not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    Thus, these theories can be convincing on a certain level. Despite idiosyncratic differences in human behavior, human scientists can make and obtain seemingly accurate predictions and evidence about the human phenomenon, thus making theories convincing. This is possible because of the law of large numbers, which says that "the larger

  2. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    brain interpretates the observations for us.Observation need use of equipments which sometimes may complicate all the process. * Hypothesis follows a deductive to inductive logical process which means general to specific.Th weaknesses of this process is what stands between truth and validity.Hypothesis may be untrue but valid in the same time: Cactuces need lots of water to survive and grow.

  1. TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

    For example, Koreans have to be polite to any other Koreans that are older than them despite it is only one year. So the way younger Koreans talk to older Koreans are significantly different as it is in a much politer way for example younger Koreans would not be able

  2. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural science that makes them ...

    This proves that anyone who speaks professionally and are blessed with the skill of good oratory can influence people with or without any evidence. But at times even emotion can affect our sense of perception about the truth. As we may not believe some information for the first time but

  1. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    1960[2], who took the traditional art of textiles of India used it to his advantage by promoting it and selling it to the people through aesthetics and marketing. According to the company?s official website[3] the Fabindia philosophy is: ?Fabindia was founded with the strong belief that there was a need

  2. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    The establishment of these ?rules? can easily restrict the production of knowledge. As of the 21st century many ethical issues persistently face Natural Science, by placing ethical impositions on this field of natural science aren?t we indirectly placing ethical impositions on the natural world itself?

  1. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    The book states that ?Scientists have unearthed thousands of fossil specimens representing members of the human family?(4). In the world we live in, people are becoming more open minded and accepting of different views including the concept of evolution. Research showing strong evidence in favour of evolution has resulted in popular belief.

  2. How certain can we be in the natural sciences?

    This is a prediction of what we believe the results of the experiment will prove. If we are the people carrying out the experiment, and we know what we expect the results to be, we can manipulate it so that the results we receive are the ones that we get.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work