• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How certain can we be in the Natural Sciences?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Sabah TasnimIB22/9/12 How certain can we be in the Natural Sciences? Natural Sciences are ideally defined as branches of science that seek to expose the rules and laws that govern the natural world by using scientific methods. In addition, Natural sciences can also be referred to as the knowledge of processes that occur and are observable in nature, as distinguishable from abstract or human sciences. They are mainly used to understand how the world and universe around us works. There are five main branches, which include: Chemistry, Biology, Astronomy, Earth Science and Physics. Within each of these branches, are numerous further specializations, namely: agrobiology, biochemistry, biometry, electrobiology, microbiology, radiobiology and so on. Since Natural Sciences are defined as the study of different aspects in the world, in terms of how they work and how they are related, there are various issues that create doubts in people?s minds and others that are left unanswered because the way they are is the way they will be. ...read more.


These instruments can change the meaning of a particular scientific theory by anything as small as 0.1%, for example if a particular molecule is being measured in Chemistry, by its molecular mass or weight, the properties of the molecule can be affected of the tools used to measure it are inaccurate and in the same way, it is not reasonable to be entirely dependable on technology as they have their own form of errors associated, henceforth, people tend to use their senses, especially vision. In most cases, scientists use both their senses and other tools for research and this can cause further errors if not treated properly because there are multiple sources of errors that are unknowingly dealt with. Furthermore, there are various scientific methods that affect the reliability of Natural Sciences and these again are influenced by humans. There is a certain scientific method known as ?falsificationism,? which is associated by the name ?Karl Popper?, whereby he suggests that scientists do not begin by making scientific observations, but they begin with an informed theory based on previous ones which enables them to formulate a hypothesis. ...read more.


Therefore, as Natural Sciences are ?natural,? there is a lot of hope that doubts cannot easily occur as science is always around us. In the same way, Natural Sciences can be hypothesized; being proven by further evidence and the result is expected which is acquired by the use of formulae, experiments and data to be proved. On the whole, the certainty in natural sciences depends on numerous factors and aspects. However, as this is the twenty first century, it is a lot easier for one to be certain in the Natural sciences as the technological advancement has drastically eased research and finding in the Natural Sciences, which makes it reliable for the world. On the other hand, there might be some cases whereby it is not entirely possible for us, humans, to be certain in Natural sciences because most of the aspects in science are taken one step further by us and therefore there might be a lot of chances for errors which leads to various issues of whether Natural sciences are reliable or not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

    So can this be considered as morally correct or incorrect? This would depend on the moral values that every individual holds since a common moral value cannot be put forward and agreed on. Is there any area of scientific knowledge the pursuit of which is morally unacceptable or morally required?

  2. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    Yet it is impossible to perfectly imitate one's thinking. Therefore logically passionate conviction itself can never be sufficient to justify knowledge. This can be further explained with the use of an example. Passionate conviction can come from a scientist (passionate in succeed in his field), and conviction is more likely

  1. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    Data and trying ti find a relationship between them,scientist try to form a hypothesis(a theory) which after will lead to a prediction(effects).To prove the hypothesis is true,it is tested.After is being tested,despite the result it will always be and endless circle as new observations takle place.This is how science developed

  2. Evidence. One of the main differences between I am certain and it is certain ...

    Proof is evidence that makes something an apparent fact - for example results from a photosynthesis experiment showing that light is needed for photosynthesis to occur. Despite the presumption that 'I am certain' can exist in every way of knowing - the individual is always able to have their own

  1. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    Natural sciences, through reason, can see the benefits of this new found knowledge countering and questioning various different types of ethics whereas arts through the use of perception can be debatable. Do our emotions come in the way of setting the boundaries of ethical judgments that change our perception of art?

  2. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    When referring to natural science it relies heavily on inductive reasoning. This occurs when generalisations are made by expecting future events to occur in the same way that past events have occurred. There are numerous books written such as Science and Creationism by the National Academy of Sciences supporting Darwin?s theory of natural selection and evolution using inductive reasoning.

  1. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    In this case what method do these bodies make in their respective fields of study to objectify ethical procedure; do they make sure that production of knowledge is not affected by their rules or are these rules meant for public appeasement?

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    In chemistry, one of the first theories I learnt is the collision theory; this is fundamental to my understanding of all chemical reactions and rates of reactions. For example, my chemistry classmates have all arrived at the same results in proving that the rate of reaction increases as the concentration

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work