• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does reason and emotion play a part in anything resembling a balanced person?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Personally, I think that both reason and emotion are crucial ingredients for being anything remotely resembling a balanced person. In my opinion, reason is defined as the justification of a rational ground or motive with respect to what one thinks is right. Emotions on the other hand, are the feelings and thoughts that one goes through when facing different situations. Both elements, reason and emotion, are equally and intensely necessary for making moral decisions. First, I would like to break down how I see and define a "moral decision". A decision, of course, is making the best choice based on the information you have about the situation. That's logic. Morals are unwritten social guidelines followed by those who want to do good things and be good people. Here you find the emotion. Therefore, a moral decision is making a choice that makes sense in light of the data while not violating any social guidelines. A person who makes all their decisions emotionally, will be flighty, wishy-washy, and prone to not following through on anything. Not only that, but their decisions would have no real rationale behind them, so they would be at best the random result of whatever moods the person was in that ...read more.

Middle

If they used an ounce of emotion in their business though, then they would stop getting ahead on other peoples' misfortune. So, we have to strike a balance there. When you throw morality into the mix, every decision is coloured by a little bit of intuition. Does the decision seem right? And I think that to make those sorts of decisions, there's a mix of reason and emotion, too. You have to be able to feel good about the decision, and at the same time, you have to be convinced that the decision was the right one. In my experience, emotion is the beginning, the end and the motive for morality. The human brain likes to rationalize its impulses and emotions to the point that, after the moral decision is made, it can categorize its moral decision as one of those clever rational stunts it normally uses to solve problems. Morality is based on what is beneficial or pleasurable to the individual, but benefit and pleasure are products and inputs of emotional states, so reason, logic and rational process is merely the means for the mind to get from one emotional state to the next. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the imagination, just because a cat scratches us for getting too close today has no bearing on whether the cat will scratch us tomorrow. The rational mind quickly makes up for this deficiency. It recognizes patterns much faster than the imagination will. For example, I once was questioned by my mother if I was gay just because I told her I liked the colour pink a lot. This can be seen as a form of reason, as the usual pattern is that girls were the ones who could and were supposed to like pink, not guys. And as such, this pattern is clearly portrayed single-mindedly by my mother, who portrayed these reasons onto me. The interaction of the rational and imaginative functions of the mind is in sensation. The imagination absorbs all sensation and processes it into what we can consider coherent. For instance, when I see a brownish, flat surface with 4 legs, my imagination immediately groups those experiences together into one whole. My rational brain takes that information and says "table" to me. Thus in conclusion, I am proud to state that reason is the psychological component which governs emotion, while emotion is the component that gives impetus. However alone, they both share the same severe consequences and are unable to resolve any issues thrown to them. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Evaluate the relative importance of emotion and reason in your response to art.`

    peple have been not supportive and hostile towards to new developed artistic movements.For example: Picasso`s Les Demoiselles d`Avignon which now it is considered great and unique piece of art.So, we can say that another criteria of art, is how people perceive art in that specific period of time.

  2. are reason and emotion equally necessary in the justifying a moral decision

    Each culture has different belief systems and what may be morally right in one society may not be in another. 'Honour killings' in the Middle East and South Asian countries can be taken as an example. According the beliefs of these societies women should be hanged if they are seen

  1. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Necessary in Justifying Moral Decisions?

    understanding of virtue. Finally, utilitarianism is based on the idea of "the greatest happiness of the greatest number"8. A moral decision can only be justified as ethically right if it is for the greater good. The problem with utilitarianism is that we do not always know the consequences of our actions.

  2. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Neccessary in Justifying Moral Decisions?

    However, without the intervention of emotion, a greater population would agree that the child should be isolated in order to preserve the health of other lives. This would seem more logical as it would be putting down an individual and protecting many others as opposed to sparing a life and harming many.

  1. Emotion Vs Reason

    As in mathematics there is however ample room for emotion, which in this case takes form as the hypothesis. The hypothesis is based on an emotion derived off previous experiences to lead us in a heightened level of emotion. In effect this then leads the scientist to dare the testing

  2. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    If however, one examines the case of child labour, the right to education becomes a moral dilemma. A family in a developing nation has too many mouths to feed and not enough financial support so; they pull their oldest children out of school and send them off to work in horrendous conditions with negligible pay.

  1. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Necessary

    The owner as an individual runs a business to feed his own family and therefore reason justifies his decision to install security around his store to prevent such theft. The owner may already give large amounts of food to the local food bank or make donations to local charities that benefit the low income families in the neighborhood.

  2. Can Emotion be rational?

    When we react to an emotion, according to its intensity, we do not always use objective reasoning. For example, we all know that wearing a helmet when driving a motor-cycle could save your life in the case of an accident, however, the helmet will ruin my new hairstyle and as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work