• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

Extracts from this document...


Essay Question: How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge? Essay Topic 2. It is obvious that we all have opinions, and most of us agree that we are all entitled the right to have one and express it proudly, but are those opinions considered as sufficient evidence to consider them as guidance to knowledge or even knowledge itself? Alas, no. Knowledge -although cannot be limited by a definition since everyone will have his/her own interpretation of the word- is the sum of justified pieces of information that make up an undisputed fact for all to hold as true knowledge. To further discuss this question, I will evaluate the opinion of experts in the search for knowledge, as well as evaluating the case of the opinions of experts in three of the areas knowledge. Have we ever asked ourselves who is an expert? An expert is someone who has gained an enormous amount of experience and advanced knowledge on a given topic or issue. Thus, one might consider that this "expert" is a very reliable source of knowledge as he/she is qualified enough to give an experienced opinion on the knowledge issue. ...read more.


Simply because history is a narration of the past, thus opinions of experts are simply irrelevant, as they are not needed. But again, it is very interesting to note that history might not be the piece of 'Knowledge' itself, it is not the historical facts alone, but it is also the processing of such facts that forces us to create a fully immersive, coherent and meaningful interpretation of the past. This might call for the opinions of experts who are -most of the time- better than us in the process at hand. Nevertheless, as mentioned before, this so called 'expert' if he/she could not find anything to interpret from the given historical object or fact, evidences and background stories might be fabricated as mentioned above. War history is one place where we can express an example of such a case. For example, consider the Algerian war (1 November 1954 - 19 March 1962). In that war, casualties from the Algerian side were in an estimation of 1,500,000 deaths by the government's statistics, while estimations from historians were 960,000 deaths1. Clearly, something is wrong here, the difference between the two estimations is 540,000 deaths, which means that one of the two estimations is based on a false fact or alas, fabricated. ...read more.


-a strong supporter of supply-side policies- and Gunnar Myrdal (6 December 1898 - 17 May 1987) -a strong supporter of demand-side polices- shared a Nobel Prize for saying completely opposite theories!2 This is a clear indication that this area where the opinions of experts are needed. However, we must consider that not all opinions are 'true' and good enough to use, those opinions need to be justified and proved efficient. Unfortunately, for the case at hand, neither did supply side polices nor demand slide policies proved efficient as they both have pros and cons. To conclude, I 'believe' that the opinions of experts must be built on logical, coherent evidences, and since the evidence exists, opinions of experts in a given knowledge problem are not needed. However if no evidence existed, the fact might be simply fabricated or just 'believed' to be true with no evidence backing up its validity, or it simply might not have yet been proven. Until then, an unproven piece of information should not be considered true 'Knowledge'. Word count: 1552 words. 1 As found on Wikipedia: Algerian War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War 2 As found on "Economics - In terms of the good, the bad and the economist", IBID Press: Chapter 3.4: Demand side and supply side policies, page 374. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Name: Zeyad Samir Khayyat Class: IB-2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How can we know when we have made progress in the search of knowledge?

    History and ethics go hand in hand. They both involve people acting on their morals and values and there are different views on it all around the world. Unlike ethics, we know when we have made progress in history by looking back at past events.

  2. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    propter hoc The fact that two things follow after each other doesn't necessarily mean that one is the cause of the other. (e.g. Day is not the cause of night) Ad hominem fallacy ("against the man") Not arguing - attacking/supporting the person.

  1. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    The best way is to name different types of experts such as Scientists, they use their knowledge of their profession in order to expand our knowledge of today, for example the famous Albert Einstein who we look up to, discovered E=MC2.

  2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Another thing that I noticed was that expert opinion can also be a kind of hindrance when it comes to the natural sciences. We do experiments daily in our labs and our hypothesises are based on previously gained knowledge from experts.

  1. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    Science, most often doesn?t recognize the line separating theoretical language from observational language; the distinction is relative to the situation and depends on the context. A close parallel between the interaction of metaphorical language and literal language can be made, there is a lack of division line between the two.

  2. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    Reed died. Jane has internal conflicts and feelings towards the Reeds and being placed in solitary confinement causes her emotions and rationale to run wild. Jane is still young at this point of life and has been exposed to living with the Reeds for her entire life.

  1. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Discuss.

    the act or power of forming mental images of what is not actually present; the act or power of creating mental images of what has never been actually experienced, or of creating new images or ideas by combining previous experiences; creative power 1.

  2. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now ...

    We can then take this information and combine it in such a way that a person walking can be imagined as a person flying without observing such a condition in nature. Likewise, I can never experience a bird flying but can have another person explain such a condition and my

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work