• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Human sciences - the language of questionnaires

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Theory of Knowledge - 11th Grade 29 March 2012 How might the language used in polls, questionnaires and other information-gathering devices of this sort influence the conclusions reached? If there is an influence, does it, or a similar one, occur in natural science research? Does the extent of the influence relate to the degree of certainty attributed to the natural sciences and the human sciences respectively, or to the social status or value associated with each? First of all it is necessary to understand what human sciences are: a human science is the study and interpretation of the experiences, activities, constructs, and artifacts associated with human beings. Human sciences, as psychology and economics, often have experiments through polls and questionnaires. I believe there is a strong correlation between the language used in information-gathering devices and the conclusion that is reached because of them. I also believe the conclusion changes because of the degree of certainty attributed to human sciences caused by the fact that human beings can be easily affected by external factors. ...read more.


After one week the participants were asked to return and they were asked a series of questions regarding the video they saw the previous week. The critical question in this case was "Did you see any broken glass?" The responses were different based on the previous week's results. response smashed hit control Yes 16 7 6 No 34 43 44 These results shows that what people remembered was affected by the verb used, so by the language used. The experiments made in the natural sciences usually do not comprehend people's response to something or polls and questionnaires. This is why in the natural sciences, the language used won't affected the conclusion. How could language affect a blood test, a pendulum or the formation of a certain compound in chemistry? Even though I researched several websites and asked to many people, apparently, I only found one person believing the language used in polls and questionnaires does not affect the results. ...read more.


A person could answer differently to polls or questionnaires because of a different emotion felt caused by a different language. Sensory perception is instead defined as: the process, act, or faculty of perceiving with the senses. In the present issue, sensory perception can be implied because of the fact that one can see or listen to a certain type of language in polls. If someone is deaf he or she will see someone's gestures and body language to understand what it is being asked, in other cases people will listen to certain words used. That will affect that person's response to the question. People who are part of experiments in the human sciences are often asked to answer to some questions. These questions are formulated so to have a certain language used instead of another one. I believe the participants in the experiments affect their answers (with or without knowing) because of the language used in the questionnaires or polls. This would never happen in the natural sciences since these sciences have a higher degree of certainty because there is not the human variable in the experiment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    In economics, the theory states that the price of a specific product in a market is expected to rise in a tight supply situation. Under such situations, consumers will find cheaper viable alternatives. For example, with a tightening supply of COE quotas, car dealers believe that the bid prices of

  2. The Human Sciences

    In short, the beliefs of human scientists greatly influence their conclusions. The confirmation bias is the most frequently criticized aspect of human scientists' conclusions. People are inclined to believe that the human sciences are more prone to bias (due to being less scientific than their natural science counterparts).

  1. To what extent can the human sciences achieve success by imitating the methods of ...

    brain interpretates the observations for us.Observation need use of equipments which sometimes may complicate all the process. * Hypothesis follows a deductive to inductive logical process which means general to specific.Th weaknesses of this process is what stands between truth and validity.Hypothesis may be untrue but valid in the same time: Cactuces need lots of water to survive and grow.

  2. Whats going on in Gaza?

    * 35-60% of the agriculture industry was damaged, electricity is still only intermittently available to most in Gaza, and the water network sustained major damage as well. * After ignoring calls for a ceasefire for 3 weeks, Israel finally declared what it called a "unilateral ceasefire" on January 18th.

  1. Are the WOKS controlled by language?

    Therefore, whatever concept we arrive at in thinking in whatever area of knowledge, we would we able to use language to express it. The same goes for the grammatical structure of language. Concepts that can be expressed with nouns are similar to logical concepts.

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    Virtually all of this knowledge is studied and accepted without ever witnessing atoms or electrons with the naked eye. We accept the knowledge because the scientists publishing these studies have noble degrees from distinguished universities, yet we never find the validity of these statements for ourselves.

  1. What is it about theories in human sciences and natural sciences that make them ...

    point saying ?Based on my observations I could say that it is probably true that water always boils at 100 degrees Celsius, but I could never say that such a conclusion is must always be true, because I have not tried boiling all the water in the world to verify

  2. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes ...

    Yet, Thomas Kuhn counterclaims science ?from its objective, value-free status? (Alchin, 2006, 22) and sees the natural sciences as a flawed human activity (this will be discussed later in the essay).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work