• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

IB ToK - The Language of Chemistry - Does it direct or limit our thoughts?

Extracts from this document...


?The language of chemistry is very precise and powerful as it can be used to solve numerical problems, how do you feel this directs or limits our thinking?? To answer the question whether the language of Chemistry directs or limits our thinking, we have to first understand what the intention of the language is. The language of Chemistry allows us to describe matter, what exactly happens during chemical reactions and the interaction of atoms down to a molecular level in a numerical form, so that we are able to carry out and solve numerical calculations. Without this, the modern world would not have been feasible, without the advancements made in modern chemistry. Chemistry is essentials for new discoveries and the way in which it helps us to simplify our perception of matter and our world itself. The language of Chemistry bears an abundant amount of meaning. Chemistry is the language of the molecular level, which has been deduced from experimental science, so how we observe and perceive the world is crucial to understanding the subject. However, while it may help us better understand our world; it may also be constraining our minds and thoughts, as the language may influence the thoughts we think or even determine them by caging our minds in the sense of linguistic determinism. ...read more.


This may be why Ludwig Wittenstein, one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century, once said: ?The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.?[1] While he was not specifically commenting on the language of chemistry, this quote fits well with the common problems seen in any language. Our thinking may be narrowed by chemical equations, which may influence or even determine our thoughts, as we?re taught in school from a relatively young age to believe that what we are taught is true. On the other hand, the language of Chemistry allows us to transcend the barriers of culture and language. Chemistry is the universal language of matter and it allows for the scientific community to communicate and understand the workings of matter. It can precisely describe the structure of isomers, for example, and the use of oxidation numbers has also allowed us to develop a systematic nomenclature for naming inorganic substances. In addition, we cannot ignore the fact that while we do not know whether the language of Chemistry is correct, it has led to countless technological advancement, and it is undeniable that there must be a reason that it has been working so well so far, that our empirical knowledge deduced from experiments fits perfectly well conceptually. ...read more.


Chemistry is rather a guide for our minds, as it simplifies the complex nature of matter, allowing us to decipher the secrets of Chemistry. It is not the language of Chemistry which would confine us, but it would be the mind of the observer which limits thinking. We can therefore come to the conclusion that the language of Chemistry does not limit our own personal thoughts, while it may be true that it influences our thinking in such a way that we can conceptualise complex concepts of matter in a simpler manner. It is not the language of Chemistry our thinking, but rather the mindset of the subject and the creativity and reasoning of it. The language itself has evolved to its current state, precise and universal, as a result of the discoveries in science. It rather stands out that the limits of the language of Chemistry simply exists for us to expand it Consequently, we should not picture the language of Chemistry as a cage preventing us from letting our mind work freely, but rather as a tool, to aid us in the everlasting search for the ultimate truth by simplifying the complex laws of nature. ________________ [1] Wittgenstein, Ludwig [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy], [Online], Available: http://www.iep.utm.edu/wittgens/ [25 Sept 2012] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Problems With Interpreting Meaning. What do the problems with interpreting meaning discussed by ...

    because when dealing with abstract words, one cannot completely comprehend their meaning based on the dictionary definition. The denotation theory can be considered invalid with reference to proper names, and if the theory were taken literally, then people would not be able to speak of others when they die (Van de Lagemaat 53).

  2. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    On the other hand, these can also apply to verbal language, if the person spoke without emotion. However, verbal language can include a variety of different tones, volume, pitch, and pauses, which all affect the way it is understood. Even silence can be considered as a language, to display anger

  1. "We see and understand things not as they are but as we are" IB ...

    Perception is how we view an image; a telescope built up of prior experiences and, aside other factors, stereotypes. It sets various criteria, basic tolerance boundaries and our attitudes and, though it affects our acknowledgment and rationality less than strong emotion, it remains a leading factor of the understanding of a problem.

  2. Are the WOKS controlled by language?

    Let's go back to the information as data example. In the creation of standards, perfect and complete information of the form of information the data is supposed to represent is required but definitely acquirable. In an image file for example, the image is represented by many pixels arranged in a grid, each of which is given a color value.

  1. Does language determine or limit thought?

    I noticed that she had a difficulty in remembering the English words so I wrote the Arabic equivalent next to each of the words then explained to her the relationships between the Arabic and English words. After doing so she was soon able to understand and remember the English words.

  2. As an IB student, how has your learning of literature and science contributed to ...

    Literature has the power to influence an individual and even change him. Even today we find the same element of hatred and animosity between the German and the Jewish societies that existed 60 years ago. Thus a society is nothing but a reflection of its individuals.

  1. Free Will and Determinism

    nature or nurture because it isn?t decided by them in the first place. 1. In one of the articles the scenario regarding men as being more violent that women arose. It was said that a chemical imbalance in the brain with the lack of serotonin caused aggression.

  2. Is it possible to think without language? How does language facilitate, extend, direct or ...

    When thinking of descriptions language may be limiting, that is why often people say ?I cannot find the words?; when instead telling a story, language will extend the possibilities of how to tell it because if thoughts were only in images and sounds no one could explain concepts properly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work