• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn more from work that follows or that breaks with accepted conventions?

Extracts from this document...


In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn more from work that follows or that breaks with accepted conventions? The arts and sciences are two very different areas of knowledge but it is possible to learn from both of them. Just as science is renowned for its rules and formulas the arts are known for breaking them and taking peoples concepts and beliefs to whole new levels. In this essay I will discuss if we learn more from work that follows or that breaks with accepted conventions and how each subject area does this and try to discover which gives us greater knowledge; work which breaks conventions or that which goes with it. Science is a very exact and almost predictable subject area, for example a scientist knows that if an object is falling the force exerted in the object is its mass multiplied by gravitational pull on the earth's surface. This is a fundamental formula in Newtonian physics. A simpler example would be that in order for a chemical reaction to occur two atoms need to exchange electrons. This is a very simple rule, and although we have no actual physical certain proof that the structure of an atom consists of; electrons and nuclei all chemistry is based around this improvable theory and it is completely conventional. ...read more.


Breckinridge Haggerty, the band's live lighting and video designer, explains that the resulting dark spaces on stage "are ... for Maynard (singer). A lot of the songs are a personal journey for him ... and he feels more comfortable in the shadows." 21 This is extremely odd for a performing artist as conventionally singers tend to take the stage and be the center of the show. The big screens are used to play back "looped clips that aren't tracked to a song like a music video. The band has never used any sort of time code. They've always made sure the video can change on-the-fly, in a way that can be improvised. ... The show is never the same twice." Which again is original in live entertainment as usually producers and directors tend to keep things the same to avoid technical mishaps? We don't necessarily learn anything from this but it can spur thought and inspire other artists to do the same with their shows. Commonly in music conventions are broken for example jazz music is well known for this. But if musicians just blindly broke convention without paying attention to key signatures and timing then we would end up with an un-listenable mess hence we have to learn rules before we can break them. ...read more.


Although having said this there is a slight contradiction in what I am saying because like I was saying earlier because science is logical in nature the very fact that it is based on theories that cannot actually be proven, is completely illogical. But the other way of looking at this argument would be that science may not necessarily be about learning but is indeed about developing, in order to expand as there is no proof in science only evidence. In conclusion I believe that in order to answer the question: "In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn more from work that follows or that breaks with accepted conventions?" we must first ask ourselves if we believe in breaking conventions because although I personally believe that we learn more from the unconventional as it is more often than not completely new and original, which gives us more to learn about compared to conventional ways as they tend to have already been explored leaving less "fresh" or "untouched" knowledge to be had. However I also believe that without conventions we cannot gain "new" or original knowledge because as I said earlier on this essay the unconventional spawns from the conventional. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK - Accepted Conventions

    By conforming to these conventions, it is figuratively recognized that these results are dependable, as it contends with the societal norms. In addition, without these conventions, problems that game theorists commonly refer to as "co-ordination problems" would come into existence.

  2. "In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn ...

    Without this fundamental theory, humanity would not reach the same scientific explanation and conclusions of current day. In the artistic world, Vincent Van Gogh was the first artist to use "Expressionism", which is the distortion of reality to create an enhanced dramatic effect.

  1. What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make ...

    It is evident from the above example that theories in the human sciences do not necessarily rely on the same criteria as the natural sciences do to make it convincing. Nonetheless, this happens only in exceptional cases. Comparable to the natural sciences, theories in the human sciences also go through a vigorous process of replication and reproduction of results.

  2. TOK Essay on Natural Sciences

    to say "hi" to an older Korean and would have to say "hello" unless they know that the older Korean would not mind. This is established as morally correct to be respectful to any older Korean as it is known as a respect and a belief that must be followed.

  1. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    Society has aimed to create inventions that add convenience into human lifestyle thus the birth of technology equates to progression. As a consequence, thinking becomes too much of a hassle, limiting effort; if substance in art is not an immediate given, it is nonsense.

  2. "That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    In there eyes we are the children of anthropomorphic god! We human beings have such a mindset that we are reluctant more often than not to accept knowledge that is new and more appealing. Despite the new knowledge derived scientifically, we tend to live in myths, illusions, and are influenced by old wives? tales.

  1. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    as they know of nothing of the news in China; they are living in ignorance and confusion. Many people in China still don?t know what happened during the 6-4 event, which caused huge international fury and calling to Chinese government to stop political oppression.

  2. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    Natural sciences, through reason, can see the benefits of this new found knowledge countering and questioning various different types of ethics whereas arts through the use of perception can be debatable. Do our emotions come in the way of setting the boundaries of ethical judgments that change our perception of art?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work